|
Post by justsomeguy on Apr 20, 2012 8:18:37 GMT
We keep trending....interesting times to come
Dr svalgaard - could WUWT take over this board?
|
|
|
Post by lsvalgaard on Apr 20, 2012 10:06:43 GMT
We keep trending....interesting times to come Dr svalgaard - could WUWT take over this board? Ask Anthony Watts directly "Anthony Watts - ItWorks" <awatts@itworks.com>
|
|
|
Post by justsomeguy on Apr 20, 2012 22:24:50 GMT
Is there any "tipping point" in the data? When we get below 1500 gauss is clearly one, but is there one above that? Namely, if we get below "x" gauss do we start to miss even more spots or is it a linear relationship?
|
|
|
Post by lsvalgaard on Apr 21, 2012 3:53:54 GMT
Is there any "tipping point" in the data? When we get below 1500 gauss is clearly one, but is there one above that? Namely, if we get below "x" gauss do we start to miss even more spots or is it a linear relationship? Hard to say, but I imagine that the 'band' just extends down to the right and that we won't see the bottom part.
|
|
|
Post by solarlux on May 21, 2012 13:23:08 GMT
Hard to say, but I imagine that the 'band' just extends down to the right and that we won't see the bottom part. And if we "won't see the bottom part", then these spots can't be counted in the magnetic intensity mean calculation, correct? Thus, do you expect the prior nearly-linear trend now to begin to curve asymptotically towards the dashed blue line?
|
|
|
Post by lsvalgaard on May 22, 2012 4:58:48 GMT
Hard to say, but I imagine that the 'band' just extends down to the right and that we won't see the bottom part. And if we "won't see the bottom part", then these spots can't be counted in the magnetic intensity mean calculation, correct? Thus, do you expect the prior nearly-linear trend now to begin to curve asymptotically towards the dashed blue line? correct on both
|
|
|
Post by lsvalgaard on Jun 26, 2012 4:16:00 GMT
updated with June data (no data for May)
|
|
|
Post by solarlux on Jun 26, 2012 16:52:32 GMT
Thanks for continuing to provide updates. Have these developments been published recently? This seems like an unique opportunity for advancements in solar science.
|
|
|
Post by lsvalgaard on Jun 26, 2012 22:00:58 GMT
Thanks for continuing to provide updates. Have these developments been published recently? This seems like an unique opportunity for advancements in solar science. publication is underway: under peer-review at this time.
|
|
|
Post by justsomeguy on Jun 29, 2012 7:30:10 GMT
Interesting times. Any plans for more studies on solar irradiance and the changes thereto with the L&P effect. Will the Glory satellite be replaced?
|
|
|
Post by lsvalgaard on Jun 29, 2012 9:01:37 GMT
Interesting times. Any plans for more studies on solar irradiance and the changes thereto with the L&P effect. Will the Glory satellite be replaced? If the L&P turns out to be real it will have profound effect on solar physics and all aspects will change. I don't know [but think so] if a Glory-type satellite will be launched.
|
|
|
Post by justsomeguy on Jun 30, 2012 13:20:29 GMT
I have recommended Dr Svalgaard for an interview on the omega tau podcast, an interesting science based podcast out of Europe. Hopefully they call. www.omegataupodcast.net
|
|
|
Post by cybertiger on Jul 14, 2012 3:38:46 GMT
I've been following the L&P effect for some time. I've spent quite a bit of time tonight hacking with some very old L&P data (2011 January) to create heat maps. The long version can be found here.Here's the short version for those not interested in the code. I think the graphs show the effect quite clearly and it's nice not to show means and what looks like an arbitrary best fit line. Unfortunately there's not enough data before 2001 to build a heat map which doesn't look like lots of splodges unless you increase the radius of the density function to the point where you cannot make anything out. -CyberTiger.
|
|
|
Post by lsvalgaard on Jul 14, 2012 4:31:15 GMT
I've been following the L&P effect for some time. I've spent quite a bit of time tonight hacking with some very old L&P data (2011 January) to create heat maps. I think the graphs show the effect quite clearly and it's nice not to show means and what looks like an arbitrary best fit line. Unfortunately there's not enough data before 2001 to build a heat map which doesn't look like lots of splodges unless you increase the radius of the density function to the point where you cannot make anything out. -CyberTiger. Yes, they look very nice. Here is the data for 2010-2011-2012 so you can update the plots [please]: www.leif.org/research/Livingston-2010-2012.txt
|
|
|
Post by cybertiger on Jul 14, 2012 8:26:44 GMT
Thanks! Updated the graphs for the new data (thanks, this literally doubled the number of data points I have). There's also a couple of new graphs showing just 2010-present, they don't show much of any interest though: cyberiantiger.org/lpdataJust updated the existing images, so just refreshing the page here should work for the graphs I posted already.
|
|