|
|
Post by hunterson on Jul 14, 2010 13:46:56 GMT
magnetic field and ocean current are related, strength of one affects strenght of the other. You cant think for yourself hunter, you are waiting for a political pedophile to tell you its CO2 who is moving the Sun Goner Now you spout gibberish. Stay gone. |
|
|
|
Post by excalibur on Jul 14, 2010 14:14:13 GMT
Instead of trowing insult like a typical AWG believer is only able to do, just go ahead and post a rebuttal. Like any intelligent people should do when confronted with junkscience.
That what im doing exposing your CO2 junkscience.
Now you should do the same and prove to the Inuits people that their sunburns are actually an figment of their imagination.
Please stop the insult last warning, not the first time you have been warned. Hunter/hunterson
|
|
|
|
Post by greenarrow on Jul 14, 2010 17:08:40 GMT
Hi Ya'all.
I do Astro Images and I can tell you if the earth tilted that much to allow the Sun to be above the Horizon, which would be about a degree in movement, my computerized automated self guiding telescope would not work. My system is on a permanent steal pier attached to a 18" diameter 6 foot deep concrete pillar. The Earth perturbation is right on schedule.
|
|
|
|
Post by excalibur on Jul 14, 2010 18:10:43 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by hunterson on Jul 14, 2010 18:55:01 GMT
Hi Ya'all. I do Astro Images and I can tell you if the earth tilted that much to allow the Sun to be above the Horizon, which would be about a degree in movement, my computerized automated self guiding telescope would not work. My system is on a permanent steal pier attached to a 18" diameter 6 foot deep concrete pillar. The Earth perturbation is right on schedule. greenarrow, Thank you for confirming that the Earth is not secretly moving off axis. Too bad that information is wasted on our new child, excalibur.  |
|
|
|
Post by hunterson on Jul 14, 2010 19:02:32 GMT
excalibur, have you read even one of your links? Or is this like that article you posted on sea current and magentism that said the exact opposite of what you claimed? Not one of your links shows anything that is credible about the Earth going off axis. Most of those links are years old. Now who do I believe? that astronomers who make their livings finding specific stars are saying everything is OK, or do I believe derivative stories that do not address astronomical issues? And since we already know you are a twit who has no idea of what he saying, should that make any difference/ Well I did check each of your links and not one of them offers anything that rises above urban legend or derivative crap. So you have said you are not a skeptic, and now we know you think like a true believer. I am still shaking in my boots about your threats, dufuss. ;D |
|
|
|
Post by excalibur on Jul 14, 2010 23:47:13 GMT
Please name the astronomers that said everything is ok.
You believe in them so you must know who they are and what they wrote about it.
Inuits Elders and everybody who actually mesured the Sun intensity and position came to the same conclusion.
Real people who said that the axis changed, or the astronomers in your head
Who you gonna believe?
Funny how in a year you never use this clone but now 70% of your total posts are trolling my post.
Might be on something good....No wait its maybe because I dont promote CO2 like your other clones are doing...
|
|
|
|
Post by hunterson on Jul 15, 2010 0:03:36 GMT
Please name the astronomers that said everything is ok. You believe in them so you must know who they are and what they wrote about it. Inuits Elders and everybody who actually mesured the Sun intensity and position came to the same conclusion. Real people who said that the axis changed, or the astronomers in your head Who you gonna believe? Funny how in a year you never use this clone but now 70% of your total posts are trolling my post. Might be on something good....No wait its maybe because I dont promote CO2 like your other clones are doing... Real people say they are abducted and molested by aliens, too. So what? Find me one astronomer who claims he or she had to recalibrate their telescopes due to axial shift. I have no idea what clones you are talking about. But then not much of what you say touches reality except by accident or coincidence. Playing whack-a-troll is fun. Since you are a troll who pretends to bot believe in AGW, whacking you is sort of lazy summer fun. |
|
|
|
Post by excalibur on Jul 15, 2010 2:37:44 GMT
Hi Ya'all. I do Astro Images and I can tell you if the earth tilted that much to allow the Sun to be above the Horizon, which would be about a degree in movement, my computerized automated self guiding telescope would not work. My system is on a permanent steal pier attached to a 18" diameter 6 foot deep concrete pillar. The Earth perturbation is right on schedule. Tilt would show right away, indeed. So to explain the Higher/Stronger Sun in the Arctic we need to look at the Kozai effect : www.orbitsimulator.com/gravity/articles/kozai.htmlThe path of the Earth around the Sun is not linear and did go on an angle creating Higher equinoxes bu the Earth tilt remain the same. The Sun Equinoxes show Sun Higher and Brighter in the Arctic and in Texas as per documented evidences. Moving Equinoxes are a prelude to Major Earth Tilt based on Mithraic beliefs. So Im just a little early thats all |
|
|
|
Post by hunterson on Jul 15, 2010 2:40:34 GMT
mithra. >sigh<
cya,
|
|
|
|
Post by scpg02 on Jul 16, 2010 6:55:37 GMT
scpg02 what is your take on all the testimonies of the Inuit Elders and some folks who took picture of the Sun rising higher in the Canadian Arctic and the Sun Disc been more intense and in the wrong direction? Do you think that CO2 is moving the Sun? I think I was done talking to you back when you were Goldbuster. |
|
andor
Level 2 Rank
Posts: 60
|
Post by andor on Jul 16, 2010 10:41:40 GMT
I have to agree to excaliber because here in South Africa it is official now that the most southerly point of Africa which was Cape Agulhas, is now Gericke Point close to the town Hermanus! This was declared after the earth quake in Chilli.
|
|
|
|
Post by hunterson on Jul 16, 2010 10:59:09 GMT
I have to agree to excaliber because here in South Africa it is official now that the most southerly point of Africa which was Cape Agulhas, is now Gericke Point close to the town Hermanus! This was declared after the earth quake in Chilli. What does an earthquake have to do with the axis tilting and moving the sun in part of the world, but is not visibly changing anything else, including highly sensitive astronomical measurements, GPS, etc.? |
|
|
|
Post by excalibur on Jul 17, 2010 12:40:20 GMT
I have to agree to excaliber because here in South Africa it is official now that the most southerly point of Africa which was Cape Agulhas, is now Gericke Point close to the town Hermanus! This was declared after the earth quake in Chilli. Thanks, now the Sun is higher in Canadian Arctic and thats the reason why it is melting. Not CO2 |
|
|
|
Post by hunterson on Jul 18, 2010 20:30:19 GMT
I have to agree to excaliber because here in South Africa it is official now that the most southerly point of Africa which was Cape Agulhas, is now Gericke Point close to the town Hermanus! This was declared after the earth quake in Chilli. Thanks, now the Sun is higher in Canadian Arctic and thats the reason why it is melting. Not CO2 What does a land change in S. Africa have to do with a change in the axis of the Earth that is only visible in northern Canada? And how does the Earth's axis change so that it only visible in part of the Earth? |
|
