|
|
Post by scpg02 on Jan 12, 2010 6:29:46 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by slh1234 on Jan 12, 2010 15:45:31 GMT
My first impression was that this must be some kind of tabloid story. Even the main stream media doesn't normally go THAT far in making spectacular claims.
Of course, we would have to ignore "warnings" from last year's winter in China, and this would not just be a continuation of a trend (short or long term) there, and of course, it wouldn't be a convenient excuse by some to not blame themselves for not being prepared, etc. ...
|
|
|
|
Post by curiousgeorge on Jan 12, 2010 16:25:54 GMT
Jesse Ventura will love this.  ;D  |
|
|
|
Post by scpg02 on Jan 12, 2010 16:40:21 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by scpg02 on Jan 12, 2010 16:44:05 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by hairball on Jan 12, 2010 17:21:09 GMT
I interpreted that strange cloud over Russia as spellation from a high-energy Uranium nucleus that got through the weakened heliosphere. I have an overactive imagination.
|
|
|
|
Post by magellan on Jan 12, 2010 23:15:02 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by thingychambers69 on Jan 13, 2010 0:07:33 GMT
I have come across this HAARP conspiracy theory before.
This was just a f**ked up Russian missile. There are plenty of conspiracy blogsites elsewhere that can deal with this. Let this thread end quickly
|
|
|
|
Post by scpg02 on Jan 13, 2010 0:44:18 GMT
I have come across this HAARP conspiracy theory before. This was just a f**ked up Russian missile. There are plenty of conspiracy blogsites elsewhere that can deal with this. Let this thread end quickly Spoil sport. |
|
|
|
Post by stranger on Jan 13, 2010 1:59:38 GMT
Well - a missile spinning wildly around its axis might produce a spiral trail like the ones in the YouTube clips. However, other considerations make that explanation highly unlikely. Not the least of those is the statement that "this thing stayed in the skies for like - two minutes" and the implications of that statement combined with a physical characteristics of a rocket in a flat spin during a low angle ascension.
Look at the lovely "black hole" at around 47 seconds into the first video. If that was a missile, that would be the point it disintegrated, scattering parts hell to breakfast. Disintegrated because an explosion would surely provide much more in the way of a light show. And either way, raining pieces on people.
I don't know what it is - and between wild guesses the guys who get paid to know tell me they do not know either. But it's not HAARP, which lacks the power to "invert the exosphere" and in any event operates in a frequency range that would provide little thermal effect on any layer of the atmosphere. And whose massive transmitter banks radio frequency power goes to antennas aimed toward Arcturus, not Cobenhaven.
My other observation is that almost all of the portion of the Pakistan Daily item quoted here amounts to poorly written nonsense. While there may be a grain of fact somewhere in there, I do not find it.
Stranger
|
|
|
|
Post by boxman on Jan 13, 2010 2:10:02 GMT
Well - a missile spinning wildly around its axis might produce a spiral trail like the ones in the YouTube clips. However, other considerations make that explanation highly unlikely. Not the least of those is the statement that "this thing stayed in the skies for like - two minutes" and the implications of that statement combined with a physical characteristics of a rocket in a flat spin during a low angle ascension. Look at the lovely "black hole" at around 47 seconds into the first video. If that was a missile, that would be the point it disintegrated, scattering parts hell to breakfast. Disintegrated because an explosion would surely provide much more in the way of a light show. And either way, raining pieces on people. I don't know what it is - and between wild guesses the guys who get paid to know tell me they do not know either. But it's not HAARP, which lacks the power to "invert the exosphere" and in any event operates in a frequency range that would provide little thermal effect on any layer of the atmosphere. And whose massive transmitter banks radio frequency power goes to antennas aimed toward Arcturus, not Cobenhaven. My other observation is that almost all of the portion of the Pakistan Daily item quoted here amounts to poorly written nonsense. While there may be a grain of fact somewhere in there, I do not find it. Stranger The spiral/rocket took place very high up in the atmosphere, so i doubt the pieces would come raining down on the people. The light show was seen all the way from west coast to northern most parts of Norway. This would not have been possible if it took place in lower parts of atmosphere. The debris could have fallen down in arctic ocean for what we know. |
|
|
|
Post by scpg02 on Jan 13, 2010 2:13:31 GMT
My other observation is that almost all of the portion of the Pakistan Daily item quoted here amounts to poorly written nonsense. While there may be a grain of fact somewhere in there, I do not find it. Stranger LOL even the National Inquirer gets a blue dress right once in a while. |
|
|
|
Post by stranger on Jan 13, 2010 2:39:36 GMT
SCPG. I knew about the little blue dress long before the Enquirer. And I knew about not-so-slick Willies appetites before he ever left Hempstead County. But when I say I cannot find a grain of fact in a story, you can bet I cast a very wide net.
Stranger
|
|
|
|
Post by scpg02 on Jan 13, 2010 6:14:55 GMT
SCPG. I knew about the little blue dress long before the Enquirer. And I knew about not-so-slick Willies appetites before he ever left Hempstead County. But when I say I cannot find a grain of fact in a story, you can bet I cast a very wide net. Stranger I don't doubt you in the least. Just having a bit of fun really. Maggie |
|
|
|
Post by graywolf on Jan 14, 2010 1:07:28 GMT
If we can form such weather disruption from 'the inside out' then why didn't such events as Tunguska do it from the outside in?
|
|
;D 
