Post by Acolyte on Nov 24, 2008 11:04:51 GMT
So we have a solar system where charged particles sweep outwards from a plasma dominated Sun.
We have vast EM effects on & within the Sun generating plasma & magnetic storms that can on occasion generate life-threatening flares of electrical and magnetic energy that can literally swamp the magnetosphere of Earth.
We have the magnetospheres of earth and jupiter as they orbit the Sun - near as I can tell these are the 2 most important ones, Jupiter because of size & earth because of disproportionate strength combined with proximity.
We have the recent discovery of regular magnetic reconnection between Earth and Solar magnetospheres.
Somehwere along here, someone should be stopping me to explain how I am not seeing a large (solar system-wide) electrical system.
Now I have no particular problem understanding how mainstream people have a problem with the EU hypothesis as stated on thunderbolts.com, but all the descriptive language, the major effects and the significant causes for events within the solar system seem to be directly related to EM causes and effects.
Given graivty is so much less significant than EM fields, why is so much of what we try to understand about our system being relegated to gravitic effects?
We now know low-level clouds reflect significant amounts of radiation back out into space, providing a cooling mechanism for the atmossphere - those clouds form because of GCR's, Galactic Cosmic Rays, which are allowed access to our atmosphere because of reduce EM effects.
How many times do we have to use electrical terminology or magnetic effects before we begin to realise that we might be missing a bet when we try to understand the mechanisms behind what drives our planetary biopsphere?
We have vast EM effects on & within the Sun generating plasma & magnetic storms that can on occasion generate life-threatening flares of electrical and magnetic energy that can literally swamp the magnetosphere of Earth.
We have the magnetospheres of earth and jupiter as they orbit the Sun - near as I can tell these are the 2 most important ones, Jupiter because of size & earth because of disproportionate strength combined with proximity.
We have the recent discovery of regular magnetic reconnection between Earth and Solar magnetospheres.
Somehwere along here, someone should be stopping me to explain how I am not seeing a large (solar system-wide) electrical system.
Now I have no particular problem understanding how mainstream people have a problem with the EU hypothesis as stated on thunderbolts.com, but all the descriptive language, the major effects and the significant causes for events within the solar system seem to be directly related to EM causes and effects.
Given graivty is so much less significant than EM fields, why is so much of what we try to understand about our system being relegated to gravitic effects?
We now know low-level clouds reflect significant amounts of radiation back out into space, providing a cooling mechanism for the atmossphere - those clouds form because of GCR's, Galactic Cosmic Rays, which are allowed access to our atmosphere because of reduce EM effects.
How many times do we have to use electrical terminology or magnetic effects before we begin to realise that we might be missing a bet when we try to understand the mechanisms behind what drives our planetary biopsphere?