|
Post by icefisher on Jul 9, 2010 19:35:47 GMT
Being sure of that is the responsibility of those who would propose to take freedoms away from other Touko. Oh please stop playing that "victimized Republican" role, and stop being paranoid about your society, it will not do you any good and looks very alarming to an outsider. We don't want any more crashes and political unrest in the U.S. at the moment, please.First this has nothing to do with political parties. I am not a party member of any party and the only party I have ever been registered with back in my more too young too stupid days was the democrat party. Also rest assured Touko I won't be forming any local militias until somebody actually does take my own personal freedom away. Unlike some I can deal with talk its when it becomes manifested in action that it becomes time to take action. Its a basic philosophy of mine that one would wait for a problem to actually manifest itself before you begin efforts to mitigate it or to prevent its recurrence. If one just becomes afraid of the unknown all that leads to is a milque-toasty timid persona. I'd like to know why you want so badly to interfere with my freedom to protect my environment? How much is a livable environment worth in real money? Touko You are certainly entitled to do what you want to do for the environment. My feeling is that AGW is just bleeding off huge amounts of resources from solving real environmental problems in a premature pursuit for a problem when plenty of problems lacking solutions abide everywhere. As a result the AGW movement itself represents perhaps the biggest all time threat to the environment ever.
|
|
|
Post by trbixler on Jul 9, 2010 19:42:16 GMT
Kid and dad get to the bottom of AGW
|
|
|
Post by touko on Jul 9, 2010 19:50:14 GMT
You are certainly entitled to do what you want to do for the environment.
You evaded the question on how I'm supposed to be actually stealing your personal freedom by being environmentally advanced. Mind you, I have no such intent. Or perhaps you did not mean what you said from all that autopilot-guided political rhetorics?
Unlike some I can deal with talk its when it becomes manifested in action that it becomes time to take action.
I don't think there's ever going to be any action from the denialist side. They're the inactives by definition. What they can do well is to lift wacky quotes off someone else's website and that's about the bravest thing there will ever be.
Touko
|
|
|
Post by icefisher on Jul 9, 2010 20:05:11 GMT
You are certainly entitled to do what you want to do for the environment.You evaded the question on how I'm supposed to be actually stealing your personal freedom by being environmentally advanced. Mind you, I have no such intent. Or perhaps you did not mean what you said from all that autopilot-guided political rhetorics? I haven't evaded anything. The quote of mine you are responding to read: Being sure of that is the responsibility of those who would propose to take freedoms away from others Touko.I did not say you were proposing doing that. Perhaps you are unwittingly and naively aiding and abetting somebody who is but your lack of awareness of that would not surprise me in the least. Bottom line is due process is all about establishing a cause for limiting freedoms and due process is by definition, tradition, and law the role of the regulator/prosecutor. Those who would propose reversing the burden of proof are in fact aiding and abetting the limitations of personal freedoms without due process. It is part and parcel of being innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
|
|
|
Post by trbixler on Jul 15, 2010 15:25:01 GMT
"Global Warming Theory: False in Parts, False in Totality" "The degree to which the IPCC and their supporters have fooled the world is amazing. As Jean-Francois Revel said: “How is it possible for a theory, which is false in its component parts, to be true as a whole.” In the case of ‘official’ climate science he could add that many parts of the whole are simply omitted. He explained the mentality that has pervaded the AGW supporters when he wrote, “A human group transforms itself into a crowd when it suddenly responds to a suggestion rather than to reasoning, to an image rather than to an idea, to an affirmation rather than to proof, to the repetition of a phrase rather than to arguments, to prestige rather than to competence” His book titled, The Flight from Truth: The Reign of deceit in the Age of Information” tells it all. " canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/25387
|
|