|
Post by sigurdur on Apr 6, 2014 13:51:57 GMT
The guy is no quack, and he is soooooooo correct!!!
|
|
|
Post by icefisher on Apr 6, 2014 18:22:10 GMT
What is odd is this information has been in front of climate science for quite a few years. Its been a small core group that have attacked the traditional data and science. Post normal science is where science is twisted in favor of belief.
The CET shows as much warming occurring from the late 17th century to late 18th century as occurred from the late 19th to late 20th centuries. In between was about a 100 years of on average flat temperatures.
Until we understand how these changes have occurred its going to be impossible to detect any emerging anthropogenic signal. Even if warming reemerges how can we attribute it to anthropogenic causes?
Some things we can understand. For instance, what if the natural mechanism is ultraviolet impacts on our stratosphere, possibly even accounting for ozone fluctuation? Of course no right minded, non-retired, scientist in this single payer world is going to take a shot at running two sacred cows through with one spear.
|
|
|
Post by cuttydyer on Jun 1, 2014 6:59:26 GMT
New paper finds the 17th century had more extreme weather than the 20th century A new paper published in Climate Dynamics reconstructs Fennoscandian floods and droughts over the past 1,000 years and finds the 17th century [during the Little Ice Age] was the most extreme "period of frequent severe and widespread hydroclimatic anomalies" over the past millennium. However, droughts, floods, and extreme weather in the 20th century were not found to be unusual or extreme in comparison to the past 1,000 years. "The twentieth century is not anomalous in terms of the number of severe and spatially extensive hydro climatic extremes in the context of the last millennium." The paper adds to hundreds of other peer-reviewed publications finding there is nothing unusual, unprecedented or unnatural with respect to extreme weather, droughts, and floods during the past century in comparison to the past millennium. In addition to this paper, many other studies find that droughts and floods were more extreme during cold periods such as the Little Ice Age in comparison to warm periods. Paper link: link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00382-014-2191-8Schtick link: hockeyschtick.blogspot.co.uk/2014/05/new-paper-finds-17th-century-had-more.html
|
|
|
Post by cuttydyer on Jul 20, 2014 6:20:47 GMT
The Schtick reports: New paper finds Medieval Warm Period was global & significantly warmer than the present, rejects Mann's hockey stick A new paper examines 258 worldwide temperature proxy datasets and finds "the Medieval Warm Period was a global phenomenon significantly warmer than the recent warm period." The paper also corroborates other papers including by McIntyre, McKitrick, Soon, Baliunas, et al, refuting Michael Mann's erroneous statistical methods which generate hockey sticks from random numbers, among other atrocities. Excerpt from the conclusion: "temperature breaks and peaks are centered within the Middle Ages so that, given the large geographical scope covered by the available data, we may conclude that the Medieval Warm Period was a global phenomenon significantly warmer than the recent warm period" Link: pattern-recognition-in-physics.com/pub/prp-2-36-2014.pdf
|
|
|
Post by Andrew on Aug 21, 2014 11:38:46 GMT
Was watching TV and the show was talking about the Varna culture being dispalced in 4200 because of massive global warming and rising sea levels. Wiki says: "The discontinuity of the Varna, Karanovo, Vin?a and Lengyel cultures in their main territories and the large scale population shifts to the north and northwest are indirect evidence of a catastrophe of such proportions that cannot be explained by possible climatic change, land exhaustion, or epidemics (for which there is no evidence in the second half of the 5th millennium B.C.). " Just curious the TV show said there was evidence of climiate change and rising sea levels. Wiki says according to M. Gimbutas (1991) "cannot be explained" Wiki climate pages are policed by a gang of thugs who prevent other editors from making changes that do not further the greens agenda. Chief thug is William Connelly who is associated with British Antarctic Survey.
|
|
|
Post by sigurdur on Aug 21, 2014 16:42:23 GMT
Code: On anything related to climate, Wiki is a very poor source of information. I took the time to become a contributor years ago, and someone higher on the food chain would always remove my references etc that didn't agree with the politics.
I finally gave up, and learned that Wiki is much like Real Climate, SS, etc.
That is why I started the "Skeptical Science Syndrome" thing. Got tired of published papers being talked about as trash, while a paper that agreed with the agenda was golden.
|
|
|
Post by juancarnuba on Aug 21, 2014 16:48:59 GMT
Icefisher,
The UV-V bandwidth (100 to 200 nm) of UV radiation is what produces the ozone layer in our atmosphere. So, fluctuations in the UV-V output from the Sun will cause fluctuations in the ozone layer.
|
|
|
Post by icefisher on Aug 21, 2014 22:04:02 GMT
Icefisher, The UV-V bandwidth (100 to 200 nm) of UV radiation is what produces the ozone layer in our atmosphere. So, fluctuations in the UV-V output from the Sun will cause fluctuations in the ozone layer. Yes we agree. However, it is not known if the variation from that source is adequate to explain the majority of the variation we have seen in ozone over the past few decades. If it is then we will have seen two instances of the academic kangaroo court against mankind at work. If so that repeat criminal behavior should be sufficient cause to defund the universities for research and put the public educational system back to work doing what it was originally designed for, namely teaching our kids skills that they can use in a real job. Just saying.
|
|
|
Post by sigurdur on Jan 6, 2015 1:08:35 GMT
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Oct 20, 2015 16:25:39 GMT
|
|
|
Post by sigurdur on Jan 21, 2016 3:32:51 GMT
|
|
|
Post by sigurdur on Feb 7, 2016 14:26:33 GMT
www.clim-past-discuss.net/7/3349/2011/cpd-7-3349-2011.pdfCPD 7, 3349–3397, 2011 Northern Hemisphere temperature patterns in the last 12 centuries F. C. Ljungqvist et al. Title Page Abstract Introduction Conclusions References Tables Figures J I J I Back Close Full Screen / Esc Printer-friendly Version Interactive Discussion Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Abstract We analyze the spatio-temporal patterns of temperature variability over Northern Hemi- sphere land areas, on centennial time-scales, for the last 12 centuries using an un- precedentedly large network of temperature-sensitive proxy records. Geographically widespread positive temperature anomalies are observed from the 9th to 11th cen- 5 turies, similar in extent and magnitude to the 20th century mean. A dominance of widespread negative anomalies is observed from the 16th to 18th centuries. Though we find the amplitude and spatial extent of the 20th century warming is within the range of natural variability over the last 12 centuries, we also find that the rate of warming from the 19th to the 20th century is unprecedented. The positive Northern Hemisphere tem- 10 perature change from the 19th to the 20th century is clearly the largest between any two consecutive centuries in the past 12 centuries.
|
|
|
Post by nautonnier on Feb 8, 2016 15:13:19 GMT
www.clim-past-discuss.net/7/3349/2011/cpd-7-3349-2011.pdfCPD 7, 3349–3397, 2011 Northern Hemisphere temperature patterns in the last 12 centuries F. C. Ljungqvist et al. Title Page Abstract We analyze the spatio-temporal patterns of temperature variability over Northern Hemi- sphere land areas, on centennial time-scales, for the last 12 centuries using an un- precedentedly large network of temperature-sensitive proxy records. Geographically widespread positive temperature anomalies are observed from the 9th to 11th cen- 5 turies, similar in extent and magnitude to the 20th century mean. A dominance of widespread negative anomalies is observed from the 16th to 18th centuries. Though we find the amplitude and spatial extent of the 20th century warming is within the range of natural variability over the last 12 centuries, we also find that the rate of warming from the 19th to the 20th century is unprecedented. The positive Northern Hemisphere tem- 10 perature change from the 19th to the 20th century is clearly the largest between any two consecutive centuries in the past 12 centuries. Must be important - unprecedented twice in the abstract. What they do not say - perhaps they do in the paper - was the unprecedentedly large number of temperature sensitive proxy records used throughout their calculations or did they use Mike's nature trick and splice modern temperature records onto the proxies to hide declines?
|
|
|
Post by fredzl4dh on Feb 9, 2016 10:34:24 GMT
|
|
|
Post by sigurdur on Jun 3, 2016 17:38:54 GMT
www.breadandbutterscience.com/Little_Ice_Age_Theory.pdfImpact 2016 1 Little Ice Age Theory James A. Marusek I. Introduction General Discussion The sun is undergoing a state change. It is possible that we may be at the cusp of the next Little Ice Age. For several centuries the relationship between periods of quiet su n and a prolonged brutal cold climate on Earth (referred to as Little Ice Ages) have been recognized. But the exact mechanisms behind this relationship have remained a mystery. We exist in an age of scientific enlightenment, equipped with modern tools to measure subtle changes with great precision. Therefore it is important to try and come to grips with these natural climatic drivers and mold the evolution of theories that describe the mechanisms behind L
|
|