|
Post by sigurdur on Nov 20, 2017 1:23:36 GMT
There are two ways of killing a strategy, straight opposition, or, adding over the top stupidity to it - GOP anti-Trump are taking the second strategy. I have a feeling that these are not RINOs they are AINOs - Americans In Name Only - they actually put making trouble for President Trump ahead of the good of the country. They will happily cause problems for the country and everyone in it if it causes problems for Trump. The UK saw the same toward the end of Margaret Thatcher's time as Prime Minister when she had a small majority and MPs that held the 'balance' of control started doing all they could to screw up the UK to get at Margaret Thatcher. Never trust politicians they have less ethics than climate 'scientists'. Naut: The current tax proposals will result in the demise of the Republican Party. The legislation is akin to the ACA. I have not read legislation this bad since I read the ACA before it was passed.
|
|
|
Post by sigurdur on Nov 20, 2017 1:25:32 GMT
My CPA, who is a died in the wool Republican said she has never seen such a "cluster ****". At this time she is 100% correct.
|
|
|
Post by Ratty on Nov 20, 2017 2:07:09 GMT
Saying soyanara to beef? Sorry .....
|
|
|
Post by Ratty on Nov 20, 2017 5:33:39 GMT
Not wadded. The Tesla truck couldn't haul what my tri-axle trucks haul because it weighs so much. Only fools would buy something so inefficient, yet Tesla will get subsidies to manufacture. And Elon Musk's forte is subsidy farming, his products only survive due to subsidies
|
|
|
Post by Ratty on Nov 21, 2017 6:47:33 GMT
Sent to me by a friend: Hillary: Just a "poor" working girl ? Very Interesting ! These figures are from an official copy of the Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton Foundation for the tax year 2014. The copy of the tax return is from the National Center for Charitable Statistics website! You can get the latest tax return on any charitable organization! Total revenue (line 12) $177,804,612.00 (177.8 MILLION DOLLARS) Total grants to charity (line 13) $5,160,385.00 (that's less than 3%) Total expenses of $91,281,145.00 Expenses include: Salaries (line 15) $34,838,106.00 Fund raising fees (line 16a) $850,803.00 Other expenses (line 17) $50,431,851.00 Travel $8,000,000.00 Meetings $12,000,000.00 They list 486 employees (line 5)! It took 486 people who are paid $34.8 million and $91.3 million in fees and expenses to give away $5.1 MILLION. Line 22 shows ending year net assets/fund balances of $332,471,349.00 which is up $85,171,891 from last year's tax return! And they call this a CHARITY? Don't think the Clinton Foundation will soon be getting a good Charity Navigator rating! The real heart of the Clintons can be seen here. Staggering, but not surprising. I KNEW THEY HAD A LOT OF MONEY DONATED TO THIS "RACKET" - BUT NOT THIS MUCH..................... Could this be part of the reason why she lost the election? Feel free to pass this on to your friends so they can also be informed. The full tax return is here.
|
|
|
Post by blustnmtn on Nov 21, 2017 12:53:57 GMT
The US tax code has been engineered by pigs to allow the pigs (my apologies to quadruped pigs) to do this legally. The tide is turning on the Clinton Crime Family. Maybe some of this money was used for things that are no longer being tolerated.🧐
|
|
|
Post by Ratty on Nov 21, 2017 12:58:39 GMT
The US tax code has been engineered by pigs to allow the pigs (my apologies to quadruped pigs) to do this legally. The tide is turning on the Clinton Crime Family. Maybe some of this money was used for things that are no longer being tolerated.🧐 Will they have to reimburse the Saudis?
|
|
|
Post by blustnmtn on Nov 21, 2017 13:30:46 GMT
The US tax code has been engineered by pigs to allow the pigs (my apologies to quadruped pigs) to do this legally. The tide is turning on the Clinton Crime Family. Maybe some of this money was used for things that are no longer being tolerated.🧐 Will they have to reimburse the Saudis? Not likely Ratty. But “donations” seem to be plummeting for the “charity” now that the lying b***h has not taken her pre-ordained throne. I think the Italians would have hung them in the middle of a piazza by now.
|
|
|
Post by nautonnier on Nov 21, 2017 14:23:10 GMT
I think that there is nothing wrong with public displays of affection in the family. But affection like trust can only be earned not demanded. Children learn more effectively from example than from edicts. The 'Girl Scouts' are demonstrating that they have no trust even within families, yet will allow a 16 year old 'boy' who claims to be a 'girl' sleep with the girls in their tent - these inconsistent positions being forced by their political 'correctness'.
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Nov 21, 2017 14:36:23 GMT
Will they have to reimburse the Saudis? Not likely Ratty. But “donations” seem to be plummeting for the “charity” now that the lying b***h has not taken her pre-ordained throne. I think the Italians would have hung them in the middle of a piazza by now. Il Duce could have told her how it felt to take a very wrong turn in the middle of the night. But the Italians keep this one around.
|
|
|
Post by sigurdur on Nov 23, 2017 8:17:05 GMT
|
|
|
Post by nautonnier on Nov 24, 2017 17:27:54 GMT
"Washington Post reporter Janelle Ross sat on a panel at a secret gathering of Democrats where she offered strategic advice, according to a report by the Washington Free Beacon. Left-wing billionaire George Soros was also in attendance. Ross presents herself and is presented by the Post as an objective journalist. She primarily covers politics and race, and much of her focus is on the Trump administration. Nevertheless, Ross’s Twitter feed is that of a left-wing activist, and back in 2015, with no evidence, Ross smeared then-presidential candidate Jeb Bush in such a sleazy way, even MSNBC felt the need to push back."www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/11/24/wapo-reporter-janell-ross-gives-strategy-briefing-secret-dem-gathering/It is a close run thing whether 'journalists' or climate 'scientists' have the least ethics.
|
|
|
Post by sigurdur on Nov 24, 2017 22:40:36 GMT
|
|
|
Post by sigurdur on Nov 24, 2017 22:41:27 GMT
IF I wanted America to fail, I would vote down net neutrality. I understand the push to do so,I also know the consequences of doing so. This is NOT a good outcome Regulation. www.latimes.com/opinion/op- longed/la-oe-rosenworcel-fcc-net-neutrality-repeal-20171122-story,amp.html Sig, the link is dead That didn't take long!
|
|
|
Post by Ratty on Nov 24, 2017 22:45:45 GMT
|
|