|
Post by nautonnier on Mar 26, 2018 15:57:33 GMT
Parkland shooting - local law enforcement and FBI - failure Now Pulse Night Club Orlando - local law enforcement and FBI failure Mueller and Comey have a lot to answer for - which is why they are still trying to get Hillary back
|
|
|
Post by nautonnier on Mar 26, 2018 15:59:58 GMT
If you want to be noticed at the negotiating table with little rocket man, you do not take a poodle that rolls over waiting for someone to rub it stomach, you take a slavering pit bull straining at the leash. In all things military you want to put as much uncertainty in the other side's understanding of your position and plans as you can with a good dose of it could be a lot worse than they thought. Go back to the time when Trump was with Xi at Maralago and Assad carried out that chemical attack - Trump launched a hail of several dozen missiles onto the airbase that the attack was launched from. That almost certainly was as much to flag to the Chinese that Trump will launch retribution between the entre and the sweet course without change in his urbane manner. I am sure that had the requisite effect. It will make negotiation with rocket man simpler as the Chinese will have sent a 'careful don't mess with Trump' message. John Bolton is such an idiot that he is worthless. The problem is, he believes his own lies. I have done a LOT of negotiations in my life. I would LOVE to negotiate with John Bolton. He would loose and not even know it, he is that damn stupid. He "may" figure it out after, but during the process he would be played like a Fiddle in the Devil Went Down to Georgia. www.youtube.com/watch?v=tnepPZChA5ULuckily they are not negotiating with Bolton
|
|
|
Post by nautonnier on Mar 26, 2018 20:27:59 GMT
"It’s a familiar narrative for the FBI — from the Boston Marathon bombers to the Orlando nightclub shooter to the Fort Lauderdale airport jihadist to the San Bernardino terrorists. Family members, teachers, neighbors and co-workers saw something and said something. Investigators investigated. But nobody did nuttin’ till it was too bloody late."michellemalkin.com/2018/03/21/document-drop-another-fatal-fbi-fumble-in-florida/
|
|
|
Post by sigurdur on Mar 26, 2018 21:36:53 GMT
|
|
|
Post by nautonnier on Mar 27, 2018 9:55:48 GMT
|
|
|
Post by nautonnier on Mar 28, 2018 16:59:12 GMT
|
|
|
Post by nautonnier on Mar 28, 2018 17:39:07 GMT
|
|
|
Post by sigurdur on Mar 29, 2018 3:05:00 GMT
|
|
|
Post by nautonnier on Mar 29, 2018 8:54:54 GMT
It is apparent that the Russian attempts to de-legitamize the US elections succeeded beyond their wildest dreams thanks to a Democrat party of useful idiots and their useful idiot political appointees in the politicized security services. All with a useful idiot chorus from the 'legacy media'. The biggest useful idiot of all being Mueller who may now be in a very difficult position. When Rosenstein explicitly set Mueller on Trump - without any known crime to investigate - Mueller was no doubt convinced that he would be able to find skeletons in Trumps cupboard -nothing to do with Russia of course - but enough for the baying crowd of idiots to call for impeachment. He hasn't. Now he may be the patsy when he goes to 'interview Trump'. Indeed, I think he may find that in fact he is being interviewed as a member of a conspiracy against a sitting President. We are watching history in the making.
|
|
|
Post by nautonnier on Mar 29, 2018 19:43:45 GMT
|
|
|
Post by nautonnier on Mar 31, 2018 7:08:43 GMT
"CNN’s focus is not on news, but on distracting itself and the nation’s news consumers with peripheral and sensation gibberish that fails to enhance the national dialogue. In the run-up and aftermath to the recently passed government spending bill, CNN mentioned McDougal and Daniels more than three times as often as the spending bill. The spending bill, of course, isn’t photogenic, but it impacts citizens way more than a playmate model."thehill.com/opinion/campaign/380867-cnn-lost-its-way-in-struggle-to-find-an-audience
|
|
|
Post by Ratty on Mar 31, 2018 10:38:26 GMT
Re-inventing the law? Judge sets aside charges in pipeline protestA Boston judge has cleared a group of climate protesters who were facing criminal charges stemming from a 2016 protest over a pipeline in West Roxbury, citing the necessity of their actions in a potentially landmark ruling.
“It may well be the first of its kind in a case involving climate change, in that it’s a judicial recognition of the measures that we need to take to address climate change,” said Andrew Fischer, an attorney for some of the defendants. “In that sense, it is a revolutionary step.”
The protesters, including Karenna Gore, the daughter of former Vice President Al Gore, were facing charges of trespassing and disturbing the peace after climbing into a construction trench. On Tuesday, prosecutors asked a judge to convert the criminal charges into civil infractions, saying in the event of a conviction they were unlikely to ask for any further punishment. After allowing the motion, Judge Mary Ann Driscoll found the defendants not responsible, saying she agreed with their argument that their actions were necessary to combat climate change.
“Based on the very heartfelt expressions of the defendants who believe, and I don’t question their beliefs in any respect, who believe in their cause because they believe they were entitled to invoke the necessity defense, I’ll accept what they said,” Driscoll said.
Defendants argued they were left with no choice because the pipeline was going forward despite near universal opposition from politicians from the City Council all the way up to Congress.
The protest was “an act of civil disobedience to say it is necessary that we pay attention,” Gore told the judge. “Now is the time to pay attention and to change course is what is needed because it’s a moral and ethical issue.”
|
|
|
Post by nautonnier on Mar 31, 2018 13:05:36 GMT
Re-inventing the law? Judge sets aside charges in pipeline protestA Boston judge has cleared a group of climate protesters who were facing criminal charges stemming from a 2016 protest over a pipeline in West Roxbury, citing the necessity of their actions in a potentially landmark ruling.
“It may well be the first of its kind in a case involving climate change, in that it’s a judicial recognition of the measures that we need to take to address climate change,” said Andrew Fischer, an attorney for some of the defendants. “In that sense, it is a revolutionary step.”
The protesters, including Karenna Gore, the daughter of former Vice President Al Gore, were facing charges of trespassing and disturbing the peace after climbing into a construction trench. On Tuesday, prosecutors asked a judge to convert the criminal charges into civil infractions, saying in the event of a conviction they were unlikely to ask for any further punishment. After allowing the motion, Judge Mary Ann Driscoll found the defendants not responsible, saying she agreed with their argument that their actions were necessary to combat climate change.
“Based on the very heartfelt expressions of the defendants who believe, and I don’t question their beliefs in any respect, who believe in their cause because they believe they were entitled to invoke the necessity defense, I’ll accept what they said,” Driscoll said.
Defendants argued they were left with no choice because the pipeline was going forward despite near universal opposition from politicians from the City Council all the way up to Congress.
The protest was “an act of civil disobedience to say it is necessary that we pay attention,” Gore told the judge. “Now is the time to pay attention and to change course is what is needed because it’s a moral and ethical issue.”Not reinventing the law 'inventing' the law otherwise known as legislation from the bench. This must go to appeal or it will be used for justification for all sorts of 'political' crimes. The assumption was that judges would have a level of ethics that would not lead to such judgements; as that is not the case and there is no accountability, it would be really good if the Supreme Court could with some of these egregious cases remove the judge(s) from the bench and disbar them for life. With that level of sanction it might be more difficult to get 'inventive' judgements that make a mockery of 'The Law'.
|
|
|
Post by nautonnier on Mar 31, 2018 13:16:11 GMT
|
|
|
Post by blustnmtn on Mar 31, 2018 14:05:39 GMT
WARNING: Life leads to death!!!
|
|