|
Post by sigurdur on Feb 11, 2014 4:57:05 GMT
Sorry Andrew. I don't understand your point. Can someone help me here?
|
|
|
Post by Andrew on Feb 11, 2014 5:00:32 GMT
Sorry Andrew. I don't understand your point. Can someone help me here? Somebody might have a brain they can spare
|
|
|
Post by sigurdur on Feb 11, 2014 5:02:58 GMT
Sorry Andrew. I don't understand your point. Can someone help me here? Somebody might have a brain they can spare That would be good Andrew. But you don't need a diff brain, just lay off the sauce for a day or two. Yours will come around.
|
|
|
Post by Andrew on Feb 11, 2014 5:26:59 GMT
Somebody might have a brain they can spare That would be good Andrew. But you don't need a diff brain, just lay off the sauce for a day or two. Yours will come around. Its probably Alzheimers if you cannot remember asking for help.
|
|
|
Post by karlox on Feb 11, 2014 8:09:01 GMT
Disgusting
|
|
|
Post by karlox on Mar 15, 2014 8:00:46 GMT
This is NOT serious (among other ´perls´ in article): "The most dangerous of these is slowing of the jet stream, which draws its energy from the temperature difference between arctic and mid-latitude air masses. If this difference continues to decrease, the jet stream might stop altogether. This would cause almost immediate catastrophic failure of air circulation, with disastrous consequence for countries that have failed to control pollution, chief among them China.
|
|
|
Post by glennkoks on Mar 15, 2014 12:10:59 GMT
I don't think the horrible weather is the herald of a new ice age. It is quite possible with the lull in solar activity that this is the herald of another "little ice age". A period of more extremes caused by a meridonal jet.
|
|
|
Post by sigurdur on Mar 15, 2014 19:22:05 GMT
Glenn: Yep, that is what happens when the sun is low on spots.
|
|
|
Post by nautonnier on Aug 8, 2014 16:38:50 GMT
To answer the question on this thread - and contrary to popular claims, an ice age could start very abruptly. "What’s more worrisome, Schlüchter’s findings show that cold periods can strike very rapidly. Near the edge of Mont Miné Glacier his team found huge tree trunks and discovered that they all had died in just a single year. The scientists were stunned.
The year of death could be determined to be exactly 8195 years before present. The oxygen isotopes in the Greenland ice show there was a marked cooling around 8200.”"From WUWT quoting Notrickszone I had read a report from South America expedition that had found flowers under many layers of ice. Showing that they had been covered and frozen while in flower - very abrupt weather changes. The sudden onset of cold would challenge current civilization - there would be no time to adapt. Imagine in 2015 ten or less growing degree days North of Arkansas, permanent snow cover down to Illinois, great lakes stay frozen all year (they were not far off this year).
|
|
|
Post by sigurdur on Aug 8, 2014 23:27:57 GMT
Nautonnier: The only one happy in the above scenario is the guy who sold his farm the year before this happened. The buyer, he wouldn't be very happy but that is life isn't it?
|
|
|
Post by flearider on Aug 9, 2014 10:54:23 GMT
well that matches what I was thinking .. but we wont know until the next Antarctic melt ..as I've said that's where it will come from all that cold water being pushed into the n/h causing the oceans currants to change stopping the movement of heat .. and bringing on the next big freeze ..
|
|
|
Post by flearider on Aug 9, 2014 21:28:29 GMT
well yes it does if you think about it .. the bigger it get's the more cold will be pushed into the n/h .. every year it melts so the bigger the ice cube the more surface area it has so the more cooling it does .. and with weaker equator heat it can easily push thru just like it did last year .. where else has that cold spot just down from japan come from and stayed all yr .. it's an cold water upwelling point ..
there just has to be enough cold water to disrupt the warm water currants and you have a major change in n/h temps ..
|
|