|
Post by AstroMet on Sept 13, 2013 2:26:33 GMT
Theodore, from the link you provided: "Last week, 39 percent of both Iowa corn and soybeans were rated good to excellent." One would think that number would be much, much lower if your forecast of blistering heat and drought was even remotely close. And I find it a little odd that you are taking credit for forecasting a cold and wet start to the summer because I can't find one mention of it in your original post. Since you are taking credit for forecasting it can you point out exactly where? Or was it a "revised" forecast when the original did not come to pass? For starters Glenn, you're on the wrong thread. And two, you seem to not only have problems with grammar but with reading in general. I spoke of the cold temperatures and wet climate cold spring on the appropriate thread, along with drought, where I also mentioned the troubles that wildfires would have this year: "The cold is the worst. For this year, the multi-year drought I've forecasted will continue into 2013.
Going into 2013, even look at events at Yellowstone National Park which could experience wildfires this year.
This drought has the capacity to be catastrophic for a host of reason in that it crosses the Corn Belt - the Upper Midwest States and North Plains States with suffering farmers and their crops and ranchers and their livestock.
Drought conditions will spread along with heatwaves in 2013 and half of 2014 as normal precipitation will come back for some regions of North America.
Dry conditions, according to my calculations will continue to seriously affect Iowa, SW Minnesota, Missouri, eastern Nebraska, Kansas and certain portions of Colorado. Further north of the American Plains, even Canadian farmland is affected like last year.
One particular reason other than the over-tilling and corn-on-corn planting that makes things worse for soil conditions in a drought, I have warned farmers to avoid farming on land that's only marginally arable. Another problem is pumping groundwater near depletion marks.
We are going to see another year of drought and heat waves so it is not over yet. It would be wise of farmers to prepare their operations well going into the 2013 growing season."Suggest you learn to read and get on the correct thread. I also suggest you take your own advice and learn to 'ignore my nonsense' as your behavior is that of a troll and at age 45 you don't have my respect coming off like you do. We all have better things to do. And don't you have a job Glenn? Exactly what work do you do for a living? You can find the appropriate thread here -> solarcycle24com.proboards.com/thread/2065/astromets-advice-farmers-2013-2016?page=8
|
|
|
Post by numerouno on Sept 13, 2013 2:58:50 GMT
I wonder Astromet what you do for living? These predictions of yours clearly don't pay.
|
|
|
Post by AstroMet on Sept 13, 2013 3:04:06 GMT
I wonder Astromet what you do for living? These predictions of yours clearly don't pay. Oh you're so funny Numerouno with all your assumptions. I work as a forecaster, that's what I do as a professional forecaster, for that is the total end of all science: the ability to predict and it pays for those who know what they are doing. What do you do for a living might I ask?
|
|
|
Post by numerouno on Sept 13, 2013 3:23:38 GMT
AstroMet, as I've said, you're not very good at your work!
If you were, you would not be here out of all places, but in a tropical paradise with hot babes and a lot of bling, enjoying the mighty power and accuracy of your forecasting.
You're probably a college dropout who ekes a living out of the gullibility of others.
|
|
|
Post by AstroMet on Sept 13, 2013 3:44:46 GMT
AstroMet, as I've said, you're not very good at your work! If you were, you would not be here out of all places, but in a tropical paradise with hot babes and a lot of bling, enjoying the mighty power and accuracy of your forecasting. You're probably a college dropout who ekes a living out of the gullibility of others. No, wrong on all accounts there Numerouno. That's quite an imagination you've got there, and not very scientific of you.
|
|
|
Post by numerouno on Sept 13, 2013 3:47:46 GMT
AstroMet, as I've said, you're not very good at your work! If you were, you would not be here out of all places, but in a tropical paradise with hot babes and a lot of bling, enjoying the mighty power and accuracy of your forecasting. You're probably a college dropout who ekes a living out of the gullibility of others. No, wrong on all accounts there Numerouno. That's quite an imagination you've got there, and not very scientific of you. Ok, why don't you scientifically share with us some pics of your mansion and the babes at the pool. I hear it's quite ok in the U.S. to show off with one's wealth?
|
|
|
Post by glennkoks on Sept 13, 2013 3:52:35 GMT
numerouno,
Theodore does not just do this out of the kindness of his heart. He sells his "forecasts" to the weak minded. This from his website, my favorite is "prophecy".
MUNDANE ASTROLOGER THEODORE WHITE FORECASTS ON WORLD EVENTS* 21ST CENTURY ASTROLOGY * FORECASTS ON WEATHER THAT'S OUTER & INNER PLANE... NEWS * ASTROPHYSICAL * GEOPHYSICAL * TRANSITS * CURRENT EVENTS * SIGNS * THE FUTURE * MUNDANE FORECASTS * ASTRONOMY * ASTROJOURNALISM * ECONOMICS * MYSTERIES * PROPHECY * NATAL ASTROLOGY * ASTROTHEOLOGY * GNOSIS * SCIENCE * WISDOM * AND PRACTICAL COMMONSENSE AS GLOBAL EVENTS APPLY TO THE WHOLE AND NOT SIMPLY TO THE SUM OF ITS OWN PARTS.
|
|
|
Post by AstroMet on Sept 13, 2013 3:54:00 GMT
No, wrong on all accounts there Numerouno. That's quite an imagination you've got there, and not very scientific of you. Ok, why don't you scientifically share with us some pics of your mansion and the babes at the pool. I hear it's quite ok in the U.S. to show off with one's wealth? No, I don't 'show off' my wealth Numerouno, I'm much too busy working, which is what I prefer. Nor do I spend time with people like you who claim to define what 'science' is but who does not show the ability to actually apply it to predict, which is what the object of science is by the way. What we do notice on this board is people like Glenn and yourself spend more time bullshitting than in actually showing anyone here what it is that you both actually can do for a living. You both spend loads of time opining and being critical of others, along with your BS belief in man-made global warming, which proves without a doubt that both of you have not a clue as to the laws of physics that state that that is impossible to ever occur on Earth. Everyone has an 'opinion' like everyone has an behind, but that does not mean that you both have to be jerks in all your posts. You both continually put people down and I don't see where you both come off, as you certainly are in no position whatsoever, to even claim the right to do that. The rudeness, the stupidity, the belief that because YOU BOTH cannot do something that others can, is the height of arrogance and ego. And that's what you bring to this board and it's a total waste of time to have to continually have to scroll past your bullshit on threads that interest people. And, to presume to get personal with people you do not know, to make things up which are clearly untrue, to ignore facts as if they do not exist, to act like snotty girls, and all the other troll-like behavior that comes from both of you; which is, by the way, the reason why you're not respected on this board because you both don't have even the most basic facts at hand to be able to hold your own with others who do. You both have had YEARS to prove your cases with 'man-made global warming' and the 'Earth forever warming,' and you both have failed miserably. You have not one - not a single forecast based on AGW that you can show as truth, as a fact, yet you return here time and again to be critical of others who do? That's a special kind of BS you know. And, rather than to say that you are wrong about 'man-made global warming' (which is what a real man would do) you behave like spoiled little boys without a clue and you wonder why you continue to be unable to hold your own with others here? That's not 'science.' It's BS and you're both full of it. Go play elsewhere and quit wasting your time (since you both are so superior to all of us) with people whom you obviously do not respect. If we are so 'wrong' all the time, and fools as you claim, then why do both of you return here time and time again? Isn't saying so once enough? We heard both you and Glenn. Can we go now?
|
|
|
Post by numerouno on Sept 13, 2013 4:08:17 GMT
numerouno, Theodore does not just do this out of the kindness of his heart. He sells his "forecasts" to the weak minded. This from his website, my favorite is "prophecy". MUNDANE ASTROLOGER THEODORE WHITE FORECASTS ON WORLD EVENTS* 21ST CENTURY ASTROLOGY * FORECASTS ON WEATHER THAT'S OUTER & INNER PLANE... NEWS * ASTROPHYSICAL * GEOPHYSICAL * TRANSITS * CURRENT EVENTS * SIGNS * THE FUTURE * MUNDANE FORECASTS * ASTRONOMY * ASTROJOURNALISM * ECONOMICS * MYSTERIES * PROPHECY * NATAL ASTROLOGY * ASTROTHEOLOGY * GNOSIS * SCIENCE * WISDOM * AND PRACTICAL COMMONSENSE AS GLOBAL EVENTS APPLY TO THE WHOLE AND NOT SIMPLY TO THE SUM OF ITS OWN PARTS. Thanks, it is quite an array of skills this person has! *ASTROTHEOLOGY* is a new one to me. *WISDOM* must have taken years to completely master! I propose for the next forecast season: *KLINGON SPOKEN* *FORCE WITHIN PLS ENQUIRE*
|
|
|
Post by glennkoks on Sept 13, 2013 4:11:09 GMT
Theodore, As magellan pointed out in an earlier post you do not get to revise your forecasts after the fact. I find it odd that in your advice to farmers post from January of this year you did not once mention the cold, wet early summer pattern that hampered farmers in the corn belt and kept them from planting until much later in the season. I have wasted a lot of time reading your nonsense and I can't think of one single "forecast" accurate or detailed enough to to be of any benefit, not to mention actually make anyone any money in the market.
Only non specific vague generalizations that occur just about every year in one part of the country or another.
|
|
|
Post by AstroMet on Sept 13, 2013 4:16:00 GMT
Theodore, As magellan pointed out in an earlier post you do not get to revise your forecasts after the fact. I find it odd that in your advice to farmers post from January of this year you did not once mention the cold, wet early summer pattern that hampered farmers in the corn belt and kept them from planting until much later in the season. I have wasted a lot of time reading your nonsense and I can't think of one single "forecast" accurate or detailed enough to to be of any benefit, not to mention actually make anyone any money in the market. Only non specific vague generalizations that occur just about every year in one part of the country or another. Again, you're still not reading what I wrote. And if it is not a 'benefit' then go right ahead and do better yourself. I would like to see you actually do that. If you don't like what you read, then don't read it troll.
|
|
|
Post by glennkoks on Sept 13, 2013 4:18:23 GMT
Before I call it a night, I would also like to point out that your reading comprehension is worse than and your forecasts and my grammar.
You also continue with the BS on 'man-made global warming'
Could you kindly point out where I have "continued" with that? Good luck I will be waiting on that...
|
|
|
Post by glennkoks on Sept 13, 2013 4:33:31 GMT
Theodore, As magellan pointed out in an earlier post you do not get to revise your forecasts after the fact. I find it odd that in your advice to farmers post from January of this year you did not once mention the cold, wet early summer pattern that hampered farmers in the corn belt and kept them from planting until much later in the season. I have wasted a lot of time reading your nonsense and I can't think of one single "forecast" accurate or detailed enough to to be of any benefit, not to mention actually make anyone any money in the market. Only non specific vague generalizations that occur just about every year in one part of the country or another. Again, you're still not reading what I wrote. And if it is not a 'benefit' then go right ahead and do better yourself. I would like to see you actually do that. If you don't like what you read, then don't read it troll. Theodore, I have never made any claims that I can correctly "forecast" the weather. Nor do I take peoples money for doing so. The only reason why I don't completely ignore you is there may be someone who's livelihood is at stake and may buy into your snake oil. Farmer's have a tough enough time trying to scrape out a living without some charlatan trying to milk them out of their hard earned money. I have no problem with someone putting out a forecast based on anything from wooly worms, spider webs or a magic eight ball. I do have a problem with someone trying to sell that forecast as accurate for a profit. Go play with your astrolabe.
|
|
|
Post by AstroMet on Sept 13, 2013 4:42:12 GMT
Again, you're still not reading what I wrote. And if it is not a 'benefit' then go right ahead and do better yourself. I would like to see you actually do that. If you don't like what you read, then don't read it troll. Theodore, I have never made any claims that I can correctly "forecast" the weather. Nor do I take peoples money for doing so. The only reason why I don't completely ignore you is there may be someone who's livelihood is at stake and may buy into your snake oil. Farmer's have a tough enough time trying to scrape out a living without some charlatan trying to milk them out of their hard earned money. I have no problem with someone putting out a forecast based on anything from wooly worms, spider webs or a magic eight ball. I do have a problem with someone trying to sell that forecast as accurate for a profit. Go play with your astrolabe. NOTE - I've removed my Global Cooling climate post due to extreme troll behavior. I'm sorry if I missed any of your comments and apologize for any inconvenience.
|
|
|
Post by numerouno on Sept 13, 2013 10:47:29 GMT
NOTE - I've removed my Global Cooling climate post due to extreme troll behavior. I'm sorry if I missed any of your comments and apologize for any inconvenience
A sad day for the world's climate science.
|
|