|
Post by scpg02 on Oct 3, 2014 1:09:20 GMT
|
|
|
Post by nautonnier on Oct 11, 2014 19:48:32 GMT
New paper(s) discussed at WUWT: A Comparison Of The Efficacy Of Greenhouse Gas Forcing And Solar Forcing Would seem to be in support of your reference. The system proposed when modeled even shows 'The Pause'. From the post (my bold): "A crude forcings model has been developed that matches almost perfectly (R2 = 0.89) the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) temperature series from 1880 to 2010. This model is compared to and performs much better over this period than the United Kingdom Met Office’s (HadGEM2) contribution to the CMIP5 (R2 = 0.16). It is concluded, by implication that the efficacy of a GHG forcing is likely to be considerably lower than the efficacy of a similar sized solar forcing.""The physics behind the model is based on the established fact that the oceans are opaque to long wave GHG energy but are very transparent to short wave solar energy. This implies that GHG energy is returned to the atmosphere and space very quickly as latent heat of evaporation while solar energy is effectively absorbed to a depth of many meters with consequent delays in equilibrium at the Top of the Atmosphere (TOA)."
|
|