*GLOBAL COOLING FORECAST: Basics of Astrometeorology*
Mar 30, 2015 21:09:31 GMT
billlee49, Ratty, and 3 more like this
Post by AstroMet on Mar 30, 2015 21:09:31 GMT
*GLOBAL COOLING FORECAST: Basics of Astrometeorology*
by Theodore White, astrometeorologist.sci
California is experiencing a historic drought, with many regions already in early-spring warm spells. The cold weather for the second half of the nation is really about the transitioning to global cooling, which continues.
Most people will be ignorant of the climate change to cooling, that is, until it finally sets in, as forecasted.
The fact of the matter is that we are nearing the end of our current, and waning interglacial era.
And the 'extremes of weather' I was forecasting on back in the last decade; what we've been witnessing in the extension of droughts, along with the colder and snowier winters and cooler spring seasons.
These cold events have also taken place in regions like the Middle East and regions south that have experienced chillier temperatures and have seen snowfall.
Since early in the last decade of the 2000s, we have been in a transition state between climates - that is, from solar-forced global warming to solar-forced global cooling. The Sun and the planets of our solar system are involved as well. So is the barycenter.
The geomagnetic weakening accounts for cooler climates on all the planets of our solar system, and with the Sun nearing its Grand Minimum in solar cycle #25, I have long forecasted a pause in our current Interglacial period which will usher in global cooling beginning in late 2017 and lasting approximately 36 years.
It will have very significant effects for the entire planet and for all inhabitants.
Now, all the objects in our solar system propagate in vortical motions which resolves a cognitive paradox that conventional scientists have when they try to forecast climate changes.
The problem is that their climate models are set to treat the Earth as an isolated body when that is far from the case in reality.
They treat effects as causes, which is why they cannot forecast and it is also the reason why they deny the laws of physics in stating something as silly as 'man-made global warming.' Truly, those who believe and push out propaganda on that do not have all 52 cards in their decks.
As for the weakening of geomagnetic fields, for instance, our Sun is undulated by its stellar vortex of the Solar System, which is vortically impelled by its spheroidal unisonal vortex. I calculate planetary transits, gravity time dilation, frequency, electrical output and magnetic resonance in my astrometeorological work.
Now, this will go over the heads of those not familiar with solar and planetary celestial mechanics as they govern climate changes, but know that the vortical motion of aether is the first principle for thermodynamics of the universe.
However, the center of our Solar System is NOT the Sun.
It is the dual core barycenter that is the center. It is located outside the Sun, when the southern magnetic pole of the Sun points through its north pole as is considered normal.
Our Sun vortically revolves around the Barycenter of the solar system.
It is the cause of the Sun exchanging angular momentum with Jupiter, but also Saturn, and then also to that of the two other gas planetary giants, Uranus and Neptune.
The invariable plane represents the angular momentum of the solar system, and it is approximately the orbital plane of Jupiter, which acts as a kind of 'helm' to all the other planets in our solar system.
When the barycenter starts to move into the Sun, then the Sun's magnetic pole begins to flip, and becomes fully flipped when the barycenter has entered into the Sun.
That is the cause of the magnetic reversals of the Sun.
This is essential to understand how the entire solar system functions along with the Sun and the planets on the Earth's climate and weather.
And after barycenter has stayed inside, or near the Sun for half the integral solar cycle (solar magnetic activity cycle) for 11 years with it magnetic pole reversed, it then gradually slips outside or further away from the center of the Sun.
So what happens is that the magnetic pole of the Sun begins to flip again and gradually reverts back to its normal polarity when the barycenter has moved outside of the Sun.
Our Sun is impelled by its own spheroidal unisonal vortex that precesses in a two-axis spin.
The consolidating vortical motion on the Sun will then cause the Sun to isotropically radiate charged particles by the reactive centrifugal forces of its manifested vortices.
Isotropic vortical spin fusion of the aetheric vortex weaves as matter and it is the causality for vortical spin radiation in harmonics of various wavelengths.
Based on this unisonal vortex mechanism, the reactive centrifugal force from vortical motion of photosphere as a result of precession effects vortical spins and charges solar particles.
So, with the pushing of angular momentum, the charged particles of protons and electrons are ejected with reactive centrifugal force that is the solar wind.
Vortical motion is the first principle for the mechanisms of how our Sun and solar system operates, but heat is merely an effect.
In precession cycles, the Sun in barycenter motion exchanges angular momentum in the spheroidal unisonal vortex, which vortically moves in and out of the stellar vortex center while at the same time revolving around it.
The dual core barycenter of our solar system includes the Sun, Jupiter and Saturn.
Now, for years I have been saying this on various climate and weather boards, with some derision and laughter from the ignorant who presume by their derision that the Earth is flat, that the Sun is insignificant to climate change and that there are no forces from other planetary bodies (all the time dismissing the effects of the Earth's moon, which they grumpily acknowledge.)
It is impossible for them to think outside their own tiny box, which is why they whine and rant on about CO2 and anthropogenic global warming, which is a myth from start to finish. It violates all the laws of physics and thermodynamics.
Anyway, our Sun revolves around the barycenter with a full integral cycle of approximately 20 years and is manifested by all planets in our solar system, but primarily is dominated by the activity of the Sun itself.
The trouble with conventional climatologists and those spouting the impossibility of 'man-made global warming' is that they are far behind in applying the rule: astrophysical causes = geophysical effects.
That is why they cannot forecast.
They do not follow the principle that local physical laws are determined by the large-scale structure of the universe in general and the physical laws of our solar system and own planet in particular.
Now, conventional knowledge says, quite incorrectly, that the effects of tidal force acting on what they see as a *static Sun* caused by the gravity of Jupiter are "minuscule," and that it apparently has no significant effect on the Sun to be of any concern at all. That's a fixed position that does not support the facts.
They say that about Saturn, Uranus and Neptune as well and I say that they are 100% wrong and need to get themselves educated about the solar system that they inhabit, and which the Earth is a sure member of as well.
That is why they cannot forecast climate changes; for all their playing with over-expensive computer models with false algorithms as they pick their noses and conjecture endless on fantasy climate scenarios like immature college students producing absolutely useless *perverted-peer-reviewed papers* along with propagandized-directed mainstream media articles screaming 'man-made global warming,' at the top of their lungs.
All of it is nothing more than their assertion that pink-elephants-can-fly.
The conventional false belief of their version of celestial mechanics with their static Sun predicts that tidal forces of a planet has "miniscule" effect on Sun and the Earth needs to be fully re-evaluated, because our spiraling Sun wobbles around the duel-centered Barycenter, which also happens to vortically revolve around the Galactic Center.
Anyhow, I'm trying to not get too technical for any laymen reading this, but the problem is that conventional climatologists are far, far behind Astrometeorology and astrophysics for that matter; when it comes to clearly understanding the forces that govern and act on the Earth's climate.
At present, in the early 21st century, it is a fact that the Newtonian model for the solar system does not factor in the precessional effect on the mass of charged particles encapsulated in the Heliosphere that wobbles and is approximately 18 trillion times the volume of the Sun.
This proves that the actual barycenter of our solar system is not a conventional barycentric coordinate, which was calculated without considering the mass of those revolving charged particles that propagate in spiral motion at an average velocity of 400-500 km per second away from the Sun that fills the entire heliosphere.
For instance, the volume of the Sun is ~1.412×10^18 cubic km, and the mass of the Sun is ~1.9891×10^30 kg.
The Sun's heliosphere has an approximate radius of 122 astronomical units and the density of the Solar Wind is 4.0 atoms per cubic centimeter with the mass of a proton at ~1.6726×10^-27 kg.
So, it's a very tenuous calculation with omission errors to ascertain the total mass of supersonic protons in the heliosphere which is roughly 1.70x10^20 kg.
However, that could have a significant precessional effect on our Solar System as the overall angular momentum of ~7.67x10^28 kg m s^-1 with its 450 km average velocity is not as "miniscule" an effect as the deniers claim.
If one considers an upper limit for the density of the solar wind, say, at 7.0 atoms per cubic centimeter as shown by solar wind research; then the potential mass effect of protons in the heliosphere is approximately 6.75% of the Sun's mass.
Moreover, knowing the dragging effect by all other objects in our solar system besides that of the Sun, Jupiter and Saturn, then that is the catalyst of the drag that alters the 20-year cycle of Sun-Jupiter-Saturn to a 22-year solar cycle for the Barycenter and Sun.
If the Sun intercepts the barycenter at higher latitude, farther away from its invariable plane, then that shows up as asymmetrical magnetic reversal.
Conventional climatologists have been miffed by the asymmetrical magnetic reversals of the Sun.
But I am not, that is because it happens when the Sun intercepts the barycenter of the solar system at the higher latitude of the Sun.
In the rare instances when our Earth enters a barycenter, it would then cause the Earth's magnetic field to be twisted and flipped, then twisted again, then the magnetic field gradually reverts back to normal when Earth has moved out of the barycenter.
The Solar System with all its objects by stellar vortex spins (movement) is primarily precessing in its two-axis spin. The precession effect intensity of the stellar vortex interacting with the Sun, would cyclically strengthen, or weaken depending on the arrangement of the objects in our solar system, planetary bodies, moons, etc.
From an astronomic forecasting perspective, our Sun's solar maximums are caused by the combined precessional effects and especially the strengthened tidal forces of the alignments of Jupiter, Saturn and Sun with the barycenter at their inferior conjunctions.
It is similar to the Earth's spring tides that cause higher sea levels by combined forces of an aligned Earth, the Moon and the Sun in luni/solar configurations, or the neap tides featuring lower sea levels on Earth when the position of Moon at quarter phases is approximately perpendicular to the alignment of Earth and Sun.
So the solar maximums of the Sun's cycle is caused by the maximum combined precession effect of Jupiter, the Sun and the barycenter.
Also, this phenomenon happens when the position of Saturn is perpendicular to the alignment of the Jupiter, Sun and the barycenter with weakened tidal forces.
A strong precessional cycle that affects the barycenter motion of the solar system is caused by the near ratio orbital resonance of Jupiter and Saturn.
It takes about 59.3 years for both planets and the Sun to complete one longer cycle. Other significant precession cycles with longer orbital periods involve two other large planets - Uranus and Neptune.
The climate periods of the Sun's lowered output, like the Sporer Minimum, the Maunder Minimum and Dalton Minimum, coincided with extremely cold climates on Earth.
Findings from isotope carbon-14 on Earth showed a lag with the Earth's temperature that correlated with solar activities.
The Little Ice Age had low solar output that resulted in cold climate minimas in 1650, 1770 and 1850.
They all took place during superior conjunctions of Jupiter-Sun-Saturn alignments with all the other planets edging the Sun to positions that were nearest to their significant barycenters.
I did this work years ago, in the late 1980s and early 1990s. Now, this was just as the 'man-made global warming' hype was gearing up after Al Gore & Company used the federal government for the United Nations scheme to make humanity the bad guy when it came to global warming.
It is the Sun stupid, was my answer. And, the planets and barycenter. Nothing has changed except we are now much closer to another era of global cooling.
Anyway, the thing is this. All that valuable time since then has been wasted in not preparing for global cooling - which many are going to come to know as true CLIMATE CHANGE.
By the time, say, between 2029-2031, we will have reached a deep solar minimum and it will have become very obvious to all that we are in a deep state of the climate change to global cooling.
You all had better be ready too. It's going to become mighty cold, much wetter and powerfully stormier in many regions throughout the Earth soon enough; so enjoy these last remaining years of solar-forced global warming (which is good for the Earth) but know that solar-forced global warming is coming to an end.
We will have entered the dangerous climate of global cooling in 2017. It will be followed by the Sun's Grand Minimum soon after; just as the year 2020 nears and it will be a strong and deep solar minimum.
Understand this clearly so you can be prepared for what is about to happen to your climate and weather:
And that is a strong quiescent Sun causing irregular seasons; increased worldwide cloud coverage that reduces sunlight and lowers temperatures along with a cooled and very active troposphere delivering ungodly amounts of precipitation from the atmosphere to the surface in the form of record torrential rain and heavy snowfall causing dangerous urban flash flooding and great rural floods.
You will experience unusual and sometimes very rapid drops in temperature (especially from average to extreme low temperatures) and powerful storms - all of this is on tap for the 2020s, 2030s, 2040s into the 2050s and will become the norm rather than the exception in the years and decades ahead.
That has long been my climate forecast and it is based on the activity of the Sun and barycenter as modulated by the planets in our solar system relative to our Earth.
There is no such thing as 'man-made climate change,' as that fiction is literally impossible according to the laws of physics and thermodynamics.
Our Earth *lives* in space - and it is from space where all our climate and weather is forced. Remember that.
Knowing what I know, I truly respect the saying, 'Don't Mess With Mother Nature." And so should all of you. She gives her signs by means of variable mathematics and celestial mechanics, in the motions of the planets and the activity of the Sun.
by Theodore White, astrometeorologist.sci
California is experiencing a historic drought, with many regions already in early-spring warm spells. The cold weather for the second half of the nation is really about the transitioning to global cooling, which continues.
Most people will be ignorant of the climate change to cooling, that is, until it finally sets in, as forecasted.
The fact of the matter is that we are nearing the end of our current, and waning interglacial era.
And the 'extremes of weather' I was forecasting on back in the last decade; what we've been witnessing in the extension of droughts, along with the colder and snowier winters and cooler spring seasons.
These cold events have also taken place in regions like the Middle East and regions south that have experienced chillier temperatures and have seen snowfall.
Since early in the last decade of the 2000s, we have been in a transition state between climates - that is, from solar-forced global warming to solar-forced global cooling. The Sun and the planets of our solar system are involved as well. So is the barycenter.
The geomagnetic weakening accounts for cooler climates on all the planets of our solar system, and with the Sun nearing its Grand Minimum in solar cycle #25, I have long forecasted a pause in our current Interglacial period which will usher in global cooling beginning in late 2017 and lasting approximately 36 years.
It will have very significant effects for the entire planet and for all inhabitants.
Now, all the objects in our solar system propagate in vortical motions which resolves a cognitive paradox that conventional scientists have when they try to forecast climate changes.
The problem is that their climate models are set to treat the Earth as an isolated body when that is far from the case in reality.
They treat effects as causes, which is why they cannot forecast and it is also the reason why they deny the laws of physics in stating something as silly as 'man-made global warming.' Truly, those who believe and push out propaganda on that do not have all 52 cards in their decks.
As for the weakening of geomagnetic fields, for instance, our Sun is undulated by its stellar vortex of the Solar System, which is vortically impelled by its spheroidal unisonal vortex. I calculate planetary transits, gravity time dilation, frequency, electrical output and magnetic resonance in my astrometeorological work.
Now, this will go over the heads of those not familiar with solar and planetary celestial mechanics as they govern climate changes, but know that the vortical motion of aether is the first principle for thermodynamics of the universe.
However, the center of our Solar System is NOT the Sun.
It is the dual core barycenter that is the center. It is located outside the Sun, when the southern magnetic pole of the Sun points through its north pole as is considered normal.
Our Sun vortically revolves around the Barycenter of the solar system.
It is the cause of the Sun exchanging angular momentum with Jupiter, but also Saturn, and then also to that of the two other gas planetary giants, Uranus and Neptune.
The invariable plane represents the angular momentum of the solar system, and it is approximately the orbital plane of Jupiter, which acts as a kind of 'helm' to all the other planets in our solar system.
When the barycenter starts to move into the Sun, then the Sun's magnetic pole begins to flip, and becomes fully flipped when the barycenter has entered into the Sun.
That is the cause of the magnetic reversals of the Sun.
This is essential to understand how the entire solar system functions along with the Sun and the planets on the Earth's climate and weather.
And after barycenter has stayed inside, or near the Sun for half the integral solar cycle (solar magnetic activity cycle) for 11 years with it magnetic pole reversed, it then gradually slips outside or further away from the center of the Sun.
So what happens is that the magnetic pole of the Sun begins to flip again and gradually reverts back to its normal polarity when the barycenter has moved outside of the Sun.
Our Sun is impelled by its own spheroidal unisonal vortex that precesses in a two-axis spin.
The consolidating vortical motion on the Sun will then cause the Sun to isotropically radiate charged particles by the reactive centrifugal forces of its manifested vortices.
Isotropic vortical spin fusion of the aetheric vortex weaves as matter and it is the causality for vortical spin radiation in harmonics of various wavelengths.
Based on this unisonal vortex mechanism, the reactive centrifugal force from vortical motion of photosphere as a result of precession effects vortical spins and charges solar particles.
So, with the pushing of angular momentum, the charged particles of protons and electrons are ejected with reactive centrifugal force that is the solar wind.
Vortical motion is the first principle for the mechanisms of how our Sun and solar system operates, but heat is merely an effect.
In precession cycles, the Sun in barycenter motion exchanges angular momentum in the spheroidal unisonal vortex, which vortically moves in and out of the stellar vortex center while at the same time revolving around it.
The dual core barycenter of our solar system includes the Sun, Jupiter and Saturn.
Now, for years I have been saying this on various climate and weather boards, with some derision and laughter from the ignorant who presume by their derision that the Earth is flat, that the Sun is insignificant to climate change and that there are no forces from other planetary bodies (all the time dismissing the effects of the Earth's moon, which they grumpily acknowledge.)
It is impossible for them to think outside their own tiny box, which is why they whine and rant on about CO2 and anthropogenic global warming, which is a myth from start to finish. It violates all the laws of physics and thermodynamics.
Anyway, our Sun revolves around the barycenter with a full integral cycle of approximately 20 years and is manifested by all planets in our solar system, but primarily is dominated by the activity of the Sun itself.
The trouble with conventional climatologists and those spouting the impossibility of 'man-made global warming' is that they are far behind in applying the rule: astrophysical causes = geophysical effects.
That is why they cannot forecast.
They do not follow the principle that local physical laws are determined by the large-scale structure of the universe in general and the physical laws of our solar system and own planet in particular.
Now, conventional knowledge says, quite incorrectly, that the effects of tidal force acting on what they see as a *static Sun* caused by the gravity of Jupiter are "minuscule," and that it apparently has no significant effect on the Sun to be of any concern at all. That's a fixed position that does not support the facts.
They say that about Saturn, Uranus and Neptune as well and I say that they are 100% wrong and need to get themselves educated about the solar system that they inhabit, and which the Earth is a sure member of as well.
That is why they cannot forecast climate changes; for all their playing with over-expensive computer models with false algorithms as they pick their noses and conjecture endless on fantasy climate scenarios like immature college students producing absolutely useless *perverted-peer-reviewed papers* along with propagandized-directed mainstream media articles screaming 'man-made global warming,' at the top of their lungs.
All of it is nothing more than their assertion that pink-elephants-can-fly.
The conventional false belief of their version of celestial mechanics with their static Sun predicts that tidal forces of a planet has "miniscule" effect on Sun and the Earth needs to be fully re-evaluated, because our spiraling Sun wobbles around the duel-centered Barycenter, which also happens to vortically revolve around the Galactic Center.
Anyhow, I'm trying to not get too technical for any laymen reading this, but the problem is that conventional climatologists are far, far behind Astrometeorology and astrophysics for that matter; when it comes to clearly understanding the forces that govern and act on the Earth's climate.
At present, in the early 21st century, it is a fact that the Newtonian model for the solar system does not factor in the precessional effect on the mass of charged particles encapsulated in the Heliosphere that wobbles and is approximately 18 trillion times the volume of the Sun.
This proves that the actual barycenter of our solar system is not a conventional barycentric coordinate, which was calculated without considering the mass of those revolving charged particles that propagate in spiral motion at an average velocity of 400-500 km per second away from the Sun that fills the entire heliosphere.
For instance, the volume of the Sun is ~1.412×10^18 cubic km, and the mass of the Sun is ~1.9891×10^30 kg.
The Sun's heliosphere has an approximate radius of 122 astronomical units and the density of the Solar Wind is 4.0 atoms per cubic centimeter with the mass of a proton at ~1.6726×10^-27 kg.
So, it's a very tenuous calculation with omission errors to ascertain the total mass of supersonic protons in the heliosphere which is roughly 1.70x10^20 kg.
However, that could have a significant precessional effect on our Solar System as the overall angular momentum of ~7.67x10^28 kg m s^-1 with its 450 km average velocity is not as "miniscule" an effect as the deniers claim.
If one considers an upper limit for the density of the solar wind, say, at 7.0 atoms per cubic centimeter as shown by solar wind research; then the potential mass effect of protons in the heliosphere is approximately 6.75% of the Sun's mass.
Moreover, knowing the dragging effect by all other objects in our solar system besides that of the Sun, Jupiter and Saturn, then that is the catalyst of the drag that alters the 20-year cycle of Sun-Jupiter-Saturn to a 22-year solar cycle for the Barycenter and Sun.
If the Sun intercepts the barycenter at higher latitude, farther away from its invariable plane, then that shows up as asymmetrical magnetic reversal.
Conventional climatologists have been miffed by the asymmetrical magnetic reversals of the Sun.
But I am not, that is because it happens when the Sun intercepts the barycenter of the solar system at the higher latitude of the Sun.
In the rare instances when our Earth enters a barycenter, it would then cause the Earth's magnetic field to be twisted and flipped, then twisted again, then the magnetic field gradually reverts back to normal when Earth has moved out of the barycenter.
The Solar System with all its objects by stellar vortex spins (movement) is primarily precessing in its two-axis spin. The precession effect intensity of the stellar vortex interacting with the Sun, would cyclically strengthen, or weaken depending on the arrangement of the objects in our solar system, planetary bodies, moons, etc.
From an astronomic forecasting perspective, our Sun's solar maximums are caused by the combined precessional effects and especially the strengthened tidal forces of the alignments of Jupiter, Saturn and Sun with the barycenter at their inferior conjunctions.
It is similar to the Earth's spring tides that cause higher sea levels by combined forces of an aligned Earth, the Moon and the Sun in luni/solar configurations, or the neap tides featuring lower sea levels on Earth when the position of Moon at quarter phases is approximately perpendicular to the alignment of Earth and Sun.
So the solar maximums of the Sun's cycle is caused by the maximum combined precession effect of Jupiter, the Sun and the barycenter.
Also, this phenomenon happens when the position of Saturn is perpendicular to the alignment of the Jupiter, Sun and the barycenter with weakened tidal forces.
A strong precessional cycle that affects the barycenter motion of the solar system is caused by the near ratio orbital resonance of Jupiter and Saturn.
It takes about 59.3 years for both planets and the Sun to complete one longer cycle. Other significant precession cycles with longer orbital periods involve two other large planets - Uranus and Neptune.
The climate periods of the Sun's lowered output, like the Sporer Minimum, the Maunder Minimum and Dalton Minimum, coincided with extremely cold climates on Earth.
Findings from isotope carbon-14 on Earth showed a lag with the Earth's temperature that correlated with solar activities.
The Little Ice Age had low solar output that resulted in cold climate minimas in 1650, 1770 and 1850.
They all took place during superior conjunctions of Jupiter-Sun-Saturn alignments with all the other planets edging the Sun to positions that were nearest to their significant barycenters.
I did this work years ago, in the late 1980s and early 1990s. Now, this was just as the 'man-made global warming' hype was gearing up after Al Gore & Company used the federal government for the United Nations scheme to make humanity the bad guy when it came to global warming.
It is the Sun stupid, was my answer. And, the planets and barycenter. Nothing has changed except we are now much closer to another era of global cooling.
Anyway, the thing is this. All that valuable time since then has been wasted in not preparing for global cooling - which many are going to come to know as true CLIMATE CHANGE.
By the time, say, between 2029-2031, we will have reached a deep solar minimum and it will have become very obvious to all that we are in a deep state of the climate change to global cooling.
You all had better be ready too. It's going to become mighty cold, much wetter and powerfully stormier in many regions throughout the Earth soon enough; so enjoy these last remaining years of solar-forced global warming (which is good for the Earth) but know that solar-forced global warming is coming to an end.
We will have entered the dangerous climate of global cooling in 2017. It will be followed by the Sun's Grand Minimum soon after; just as the year 2020 nears and it will be a strong and deep solar minimum.
Understand this clearly so you can be prepared for what is about to happen to your climate and weather:
And that is a strong quiescent Sun causing irregular seasons; increased worldwide cloud coverage that reduces sunlight and lowers temperatures along with a cooled and very active troposphere delivering ungodly amounts of precipitation from the atmosphere to the surface in the form of record torrential rain and heavy snowfall causing dangerous urban flash flooding and great rural floods.
You will experience unusual and sometimes very rapid drops in temperature (especially from average to extreme low temperatures) and powerful storms - all of this is on tap for the 2020s, 2030s, 2040s into the 2050s and will become the norm rather than the exception in the years and decades ahead.
That has long been my climate forecast and it is based on the activity of the Sun and barycenter as modulated by the planets in our solar system relative to our Earth.
There is no such thing as 'man-made climate change,' as that fiction is literally impossible according to the laws of physics and thermodynamics.
Our Earth *lives* in space - and it is from space where all our climate and weather is forced. Remember that.
Knowing what I know, I truly respect the saying, 'Don't Mess With Mother Nature." And so should all of you. She gives her signs by means of variable mathematics and celestial mechanics, in the motions of the planets and the activity of the Sun.