*GLOBAL COOLING FORECAST: Basics of Astrometeorology* Jun 6, 2015 0:54:28 GMT Code likes this
Post by AstroMet on Jun 6, 2015 0:54:28 GMT
Why are you falsely claiming astronomers believe the Sun is static and is unaffected by the planets rotating around it?
I note also that quite a bit of your text appears to be inspired by a group called UVS who issue the disclaimer:
As far as the mainstream modern physics is concerned, the above revolutionary discoveries and conjectures based on the unheard-of hypothesis of Universal Vortical Singularity with its paradigm shift are unconventional. Also the evaluation of the uncharted at fundamental stage might not be thoroughly covered, bound to have shortcomings, loose ends and errors, many details and assumptions have yet to be further researched, probed, evaluated, validated, or proven. Many of the implicit explanations are for casual understanding of the topics presented in the UVS worldview
To be fair to your audience if you wish to use their ideas and diagrams you should be issuing a similar disclaimer that your ideas are not based in mainstream modern physics, but instead are based on the unheard of hypothesis of Universal Vortical Singularity and are bound to have shortcomings, loose ends and errors, and many details and assumptions have yet to be further researched, probed, evaluated, validated or proven.
Lets get real here. You are presenting your information to the public as well researched thought out science when you know for a fact you are lying.
Calling people 'liars' is not a way to get along on this forum Andrew and I would also remind you that your comments on this forum to Icefisher per your 'pea' comment shows that your shortcomings stem from a lack of basic understanding of the Earth's climate and how it functions.
And do not tell me (or anyone else for that matter) what our 'ideas' are as you certainly are in no position as an expert in these matters as you pretend to be.
So, yes, let's get 'real' here.
Do not presume to 'tell' me what my work is based on, but ask first before you go around calling others 'liars' based on your assumptions and presumptions, which is stupid to say the least.
Most, if not all of the genesis and origins of what you call 'mainstream modern physics' comes from Applied Astrology and are quite old. You treat this subject with your illogical comment as if it makes sense.
For example, how can you state (since you seem to love to argue but not make sense) can you say:
"...any details and assumptions have yet to be further researched, probed, evaluated, validated, or proven."
And then immediately after stating that, you claim, in the same breath, that these ideas are new? You actually said that universal vortical singularity is an unheard of hypothesis.
I tell you, they are not and have been around for a long time.
You have much to learn kiddo.
My own practice of astronomic climate forecasting, or Astrometeorology, is NOT based on what you call the modern version of vortical singularity (an assumption, among many that you've made which are 100% wrong) but rather on the extensive work of the astrometeorologist Johannes Kepler, primarily on the magnetic aether force field vortex of planetary orbits - known also as Applied Astrology.
And I've been working in this manner forecasting as an applied astrologer for a long time.
Kepler believed and practiced applied astrology. He knew that solar, lunar, planetary and stellar configurations and their aspects physically existed and affected human beings, including Earth's climate and weather.
Among his works (which I am sure that you have not read though you assume much Andrew) included 'On the more certain foundations of Astrology (1601) also 'In The Intervening Third Man'(1610) where Kepler cited a definite relationship between the causes of heavenly phenomena and effects on the events on Earth.
Nearly 1,000 horoscopes cast by Kepler himself still exist. And part of his duties as expert forecaster and mathematician to the city state of Graz, Kepler put out a forecast for 1595 where he predicted a peasant uprising, a Turkish invasion and a climate of bitter cold - all which took place as forecasted.
Kepler is known to have compiled numerous forecasts for 1595 to 1606, and from 1617 to 1624. As court mathematician, he explained to Rudolf II the horoscopes of the Emperor Augustus and Mohammed, and gave astrological forecasts for the outcome of a war between the Republic of Venice and Paul V.
In another work called 'On the New Star (1606) he explained the meaning of a new star of 1604 as being 'the conversion of America and downfall of Islam. In his 'De Cometis Libelli Tres (1619) he continues with many astrological forecasts of note.
In the instruction video below, you will learn this:
"Kepler was convinced that God had created the Universe in accordance with some perfect geometrical principle! But when he observed the motion of the planets he found that they move in elliptical orbits with speeds that vary relative to their distance from the Sun.
As the planet moves along its path, it sweeps out an equal area segments in an equal time. So there is a form of geometrical symmetry, but the symmetry seems to be broken by the shape of the elliptical orbit.
This video explains an artist theory on the physics of 'time' as a physical process. In this theory if the planets orbits were circular there would be no variation in speed and we would have perfect symmetry in movement space and time.
This is because objects just free-fall towards the greatest energy because it has the greatest time dilation. The time dilation formed by the Sun is spherical therefore a planet in circular orbit will not encounter a gravitational difference that is formed by time dilation."
"My aim is to say that the machinery of the heavens is not like a divine animal but like a clock, and that in it almost all the variety of motions is from one very simple magnetic force acting on bodies - as in the clock all motions are from a very simple weight." ~ Kepler, in his letter to J.G. Herwart von Hohenburg from February 16, 1605.