|
Post by missouriboy on Jan 18, 2016 20:14:03 GMT
"Last month, almost 200 governments agreed a deal in Paris meant as a turning point from fossil fuels, blamed for causing everything." I just corrected the final paragraph..... Good call Acidohm ... I'm sure that is what the author meant. So what and where is this study??? And where the hell is all this heat?? If they're looking down to 2000 m, then they are shirley (don't call me shirley) looking at Argo??? Am I blind ... am I incompetent ... have i been sucking down to many adult beverages??? Tell me where those huge temperature changes are from the four oceans charted below. Well ... the the upper 2000 meters of water has increased by maybe 0.025 C over the last decade. That's a real scary figure of 0.25 C per century. And yes, most (all) of this appears to be going into the deepest part of the Argo data. Say bye-bye for the forseeable future? Probably. I hate being scared and not knowing what it's all about! Grumble grumble. I know ... it's all hiding in the Indian Ocean ... so there ya have it.
|
|
|
Post by sigurdur on Jan 18, 2016 20:26:45 GMT
Actually, it is hiding where it is dark, on the bottom of the ocean.
Now..........will it ever see the light of day?
(OK OK..........) It might stay dark down under.........
The cow flew over the moon last night too, but it was a dark moon and no one saw the cow do it. But we all known it happened because the tide was .0000000000000000000000001Nanometer higher at Washington DC tidal gauge.
Sooooooooo................there ya have it missouriboy! You denier you!!!!
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Jan 19, 2016 3:38:19 GMT
The report, examining ocean temperatures to depths of more than 2,000 meters (6,500 ft), found that "half of the total global ocean heat uptake since 1865 has accumulated since 1997". The year 1865 is taken as the start of wide use of fossil fuels. Where ya suppose I get these figures that they are so confident of? Yah, Yah ... I looked there but there's no sunlight.
|
|
|
Post by icefisher on Jan 21, 2016 2:01:19 GMT
I agree fundamentally with Dr LaTour. Emmissivity is the most important greenhouse warming factor. Switching CO2 for O2 may indeed cause cooling. . . .but probably so little it can't be measured.
|
|
|
Post by sigurdur on Jan 21, 2016 3:22:38 GMT
Andrew! Read the link above!!!! Remember me telling you about height making a huge difference?
|
|
|
Post by Andrew on Jan 21, 2016 6:05:53 GMT
Andrew! Read the link above!!!! Remember me telling you about height making a huge difference? Sure I remember well that you seem to think the Earth is a very small object so that 5km upwards should get my attention when the Earth is 40,000km in circumferance. I did the calculations for you but evidently you still think the Earth is a very small object.
|
|
|
Post by Andrew on Jan 21, 2016 18:15:45 GMT
I just realised that Latour is the same idiot who thinks he falsified the radiation science of the last 150 years by supposedly demolishing a thought experiment proposed by Roy spencer which simply complied with ordinary engineering heat loss calculations.
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Jan 26, 2016 4:22:20 GMT
"Last month, almost 200 governments agreed a deal in Paris meant as a turning point from fossil fuels, blamed for causing everything." I just corrected the final paragraph..... Good call Acidohm ... I'm sure that is what the author meant. So what and where is this study??? And where the hell is all this heat?? If they're looking down to 2000 m, then they are shirley (don't call me shirley) looking at Argo??? Am I blind ... am I incompetent ... have i been sucking down to many adult beverages??? Tell me where those huge temperature changes are from the four oceans charted below. Well ... the the upper 2000 meters of water has increased by maybe 0.025 C over the last decade. That's a real scary figure of 0.25 C per century. And yes, most (all) of this appears to be going into the deepest part of the Argo data. Say bye-bye for the forseeable future? Probably. I hate being scared and not knowing what it's all about! Grumble grumble. I know ... it's all hiding in the Indian Ocean ... so there ya have it. Updated 1/25/16: Nope ... it's not there.
For anyone interested in wading through an accountant-like analysis of comparing the IPCC's projections of heat going into the worlds ocean with what really happened, then here it is: dhf66.wordpress.com/2016/01/17/ipcc-expected-3-times-as-much-warming-as-observed-the-last-10-years-ipcc-is-wrong/check out the video at the end.
|
|
|
Post by acidohm on Jun 28, 2016 19:26:48 GMT
www.facebook.com/EarthWindMap/The Earth nullschool facebook page has been producing some really nice animations, ive tried using the URL to put video here but failed (booo ) I particularly like the recent CO2 over USA and the sea surface heights a few posts ago showing the tracks and dissipations of pacific storms.....
|
|
|
Post by Ratty on Jun 29, 2016 4:14:21 GMT
|
|
|
Post by acidohm on Jun 29, 2016 5:08:17 GMT
Thanks for your effort ratty...but that doesn't work for me :/
|
|
|
Post by Ratty on Jun 29, 2016 6:06:24 GMT
Thanks for your effort ratty...but that doesn't work for me :/ Doesn't work for me now either ...... ? I ran it earlier and saw the animation, red blobs and all.
|
|
|
Post by icefisher on Jun 29, 2016 13:47:13 GMT
I ran it earlier and saw the animation, red blobs and all. There they go again! Red blobs? Using fake colors to build alarmism! Show me an animation with honest colors! !
|
|
|
Post by Ratty on Jun 29, 2016 22:16:29 GMT
I ran it earlier and saw the animation, red blobs and all. There they go again! Red blobs? Using fake colors to build alarmism! Show me an animation with honest colors! ! But, but ..... CO2 is red, isn't it?
|
|
|
Post by acidohm on Jun 30, 2016 5:18:16 GMT
There they go again! Red blobs? Using fake colors to build alarmism! Show me an animation with honest colors! ! But, but ..... CO2 is red, isn't it? Well it's supposed to affect infra-red??
|
|