|
Post by Andrew on Feb 3, 2016 16:11:21 GMT
So following on from Icefishers law >>>the only thing demonstrated has been the surface warms to the same temperature as the hot radiating object The cold steel and hot air are inside the Sun inside the sphere of influence of the sun. Or maybe inside the sphere of influence of the son of God. But if we are stuck with human knowledge to date, then given Icefishers law >>>>>the only thing demonstrated has been the surface warms to the same temperature as the hot radiating object The cold steel and hot air are inside the Sun
|
|
|
Post by icefisher on Feb 3, 2016 17:02:46 GMT
inside the sphere of influence of the sun. Or maybe inside the sphere of influence of the son of God. But if we are stuck with human knowledge to date, then given Icefishers law >>>>>the only thing demonstrated has been the surface warms to the same temperature as the hot radiating object The cold steel and hot air are inside the Sun so you belierve we are inside of the sun? or is this another andrew strawmen where he takes ones position modifies it at his pleasure then remarkets it as some body elses brand? Do you also do that with premium brand products? Do you have a sideline selling fake rolex watches?
|
|
|
Post by Andrew on Feb 3, 2016 17:18:06 GMT
Or maybe inside the sphere of influence of the son of God. But if we are stuck with human knowledge to date, then given Icefishers law >>>>>the only thing demonstrated has been the surface warms to the same temperature as the hot radiating object The cold steel and hot air are inside the Sun so you belierve we are inside of the sun? or is this another andrew strawmen where he takes ones position modifies it at his pleasure then remarkets it as some body elses brand? Do you also do that with premium brand products? Do you have a sideline selling fake rolex watches? >>>>>>>>the only thing demonstrated has been the surface warms to the same temperature as the hot radiating object I asked you before what that was supposed to mean and you showed me your arse that time too. I dont do strawmen lie or cheat. Given your text to date the metal and hot air are inside the surface of the Sun or the laws of physics are wrong.
|
|
|
Post by icefisher on Feb 3, 2016 18:26:09 GMT
so you belierve we are inside of the sun? or is this another andrew strawmen where he takes ones position modifies it at his pleasure then remarkets it as some body elses brand? Do you also do that with premium brand products? Do you have a sideline selling fake rolex watches? >>>>>>>>the only thing demonstrated has been the surface warms to the same temperature as the hot radiating object I asked you before what that was supposed to mean and you showed me your arse that time too. I dont do strawmen lie or cheat. Given your text to date the metal and hot air are inside the surface of the Sun or the laws of physics are wrong. You know very well that what I mean by "the surface" warming to the same temperature as the hot radiating object is that is adjustable downwards by field of view and distance from the object. So point are you trying to make?
|
|
|
Post by Andrew on Feb 3, 2016 18:53:33 GMT
>>>>>>>>the only thing demonstrated has been the surface warms to the same temperature as the hot radiating object I asked you before what that was supposed to mean and you showed me your arse that time too. I dont do strawmen lie or cheat. Given your text to date the metal and hot air are inside the surface of the Sun or the laws of physics are wrong. You know very well that what I mean by "the surface" warming to the same temperature as the hot radiating object is that is adjustable downwards by field of view and distance from the object. So point are you trying to make? Sigh. I am 60 years old. I do not lie cheat change goal posts or do straw men >>>"the surface" warming to the same temperature as the hot radiating object is that is adjustable downwards by field of view and distance from the object. How can it ever get to the temperature of the hot radiating object unless it can be inside the hot radiating object? ?
|
|
|
Post by icefisher on Feb 3, 2016 19:12:38 GMT
You know very well that what I mean by "the surface" warming to the same temperature as the hot radiating object is that is adjustable downwards by field of view and distance from the object. So point are you trying to make? Sigh. I am 60 years old. I do not lie cheat change goal posts or do straw men >>>"the surface" warming to the same temperature as the hot radiating object is that is adjustable downwards by field of view and distance from the object. How can it ever get to the temperature of the hot radiating object unless it can be inside the hot radiating object? ? Well I am willing to listen to your theory. The temperature of a blackbody the same average distance to the sun as earth is calculated to be 278.5K, the temperature of the surface of the sun as modified by field of view (estimated at one fourth due to rotation and average orientation of the surface) and as modified by the distance from the sun. Are you claiming thats BS?
|
|
|
Post by Andrew on Feb 3, 2016 19:20:41 GMT
Sigh. I am 60 years old. I do not lie cheat change goal posts or do straw men >>>"the surface" warming to the same temperature as the hot radiating object is that is adjustable downwards by field of view and distance from the object. How can it ever get to the temperature of the hot radiating object unless it can be inside the hot radiating object? ? Well I am willing to listen to your theory. The temperature of a blackbody the same average distance to the sun as earth is calculated to be 278.5K, the temperature of the surface of the sun as modified by field of view (estimated at one fourth due to rotation and average orientation of the surface) and as modified by the distance from the sun. Are you claiming thats BS? If we measure a surface on the sun to be 5500 degrees according to black body law, then the only way the Earth can be that temperature is when the whole earth is at or inside that surface. Anyway, I now finally understand what you were talking about.
|
|