|
Post by sigurdur on Mar 14, 2017 21:11:40 GMT
To further refine the argument. How much energy is retained in the 15 Gauss band of CO2 based on an increase of 100ppmv? From 300 to 400 ppmv.
|
|
|
Post by Ratty on Mar 14, 2017 22:52:30 GMT
To further refine the argument. How much energy is retained in the 15 Gauss band of CO2 based on an increase of 100ppmv? From 300 to 400 ppmv. Is that a well-mixed 100ppmv increase?
|
|
|
Post by sigurdur on Mar 15, 2017 1:13:15 GMT
Yep, well mixed, unless you live in Australia. Then it seems most of the 100 resides there. The politicians all indicate heat related cognitive stress.
|
|
|
Post by sigurdur on Mar 17, 2017 17:00:29 GMT
|
|
|
Post by sigurdur on Mar 17, 2017 17:18:34 GMT
The ozone abundance in the Earth's atmosphere is in- fluenced strongly by the level of solar UV radiation (e.g., Haigh 1994). Knowledge of the evolution of the solar spec- tral irradiance is therefore important for obtaining an idea of long-term changes in stratospheric chemistry and possible associated climate changes.
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Mar 17, 2017 18:37:23 GMT
You're on a roll today Sig. Safe to say that many of these did not get much air time when published.
|
|
|
Post by sigurdur on Mar 17, 2017 20:25:51 GMT
You're on a roll today Sig. Safe to say that many of these did not get much air time when published. Look at the # of citations tho! Ya see, climate science ignores the Solar folks. At their own peril I might add.
|
|
|
Post by sigurdur on Mar 17, 2017 20:38:51 GMT
You're on a roll today Sig. Safe to say that many of these did not get much air time when published. Katharine Hayhoe told me last week that my "myths" won't be tolerated on her facebook page. Funny thing is, I don't follow myths. I love reading the actual literature. Her math skills are so bad that she stated the current warming is caused 110% by humans. You can't have more than 110%. Sure, you can make it up, but math is still math and an area that I now fully understand climate folks just can't absorb. Ever observed a sale where the price is reduced 110%? Or the idea that increasing a price from $10,000 to $20,000 is a 100% increase in price. No, it isn't. It is a 50% increase in price. 50% (x) = $10,000. The x is the increased price.
|
|
|
Post by graywolf on Mar 18, 2017 11:49:42 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Ratty on Mar 18, 2017 12:39:13 GMT
The comments are always the most interesting part:
|
|
|
Post by sigurdur on Mar 18, 2017 13:14:30 GMT
I agree. He is somewhat mad. He did establish that 90%+ of Greenland's mass melts away during interglacials.
|
|