Global Cooling over time

[sigurdur]

. The absence of noteworthy secular changes in Milankovitch forcing, and the weakness of the 100 ka eccentricity insolation cycle, indicates internal feedbacks within the Earth system rather than orbital forcing alone were the cause of these two phases2,4. There is currently no consensus on what internal forcing shifts led to the MPT.

www.nature.com/articles/s41467-018-07828-0?fbclid=IwAR3RjXuFvBs08Fgb2Tuja3h-3dP4qWmvOWqMOQ4TbOUm3wWQW3xphjQMOZc

[Ratty]

Dec 21, 2018 18:38:52 GMT sigurdur said:

. The absence of noteworthy secular changes in Milankovitch forcing, and the weakness of the 100 ka eccentricity insolation cycle, indicates internal feedbacks within the Earth system rather than orbital forcing alone were the cause of these two phases2,4. There is currently no consensus on what internal forcing shifts led to the MPT.

www.nature.com/articles/s41467-018-07828-0?fbclid=IwAR3RjXuFvBs08Fgb2Tuja3h-3dP4qWmvOWqMOQ4TbOUm3wWQW3xphjQMOZc

It's good to see CO2 getting star billing ....

Authors: Sev Kender, Ana Christina Ravelo, Savannah Worne, George E. A. Swann, Melanie J. Leng, Hirofumi Asahi, Julia Becker, Henrieka Detlef, Ivano W. Aiello, d**e Andreasen & Ian R. Hall


Obviously, climate research is where the money's at. I read lots of abstracts and it's not often I see the same names.

I suggest an audit to determine how many researchers are out there in the climate fields: John Cook could handle it, I think.