|
|
Post by hankslincoln on Nov 18, 2011 18:36:46 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by hankslincoln on Nov 19, 2011 14:11:37 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by trbixler on Nov 19, 2011 17:45:30 GMT
Puzzling how it is Ok for this guy to take money for the green agenda while working for NASA and no one questions anything. Kind of Chicago politics at work. |
|
|
|
Post by hankslincoln on Nov 19, 2011 20:01:28 GMT
Ya, I live pretty far out in the country and have never been broken into, but I make a point to lock my doors at night.
|
|
|
|
Post by hankslincoln on Nov 28, 2011 18:19:43 GMT
The corruption of science is profound. "People with bona fide scientific background should not review articles, as they might actually accept them for publication." "… is it not partially the responsibility of climate science to make sure only satisfactorily [agreeing with their views] peer-reviewed science appears in scientific publications?" wattsupwiththat.com/2011/11/27/the-tribalistic-corruption-of-peer-review-the-chris-de-freitas-incident/#more-52065 |
|
|
|
Post by hankslincoln on Dec 2, 2011 23:26:55 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by hankslincoln on Dec 8, 2011 23:24:10 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by hankslincoln on Jan 13, 2012 0:19:22 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by throttleup on Jan 13, 2012 12:19:12 GMT
I took a bath last night and the water was hot. Coincidence? I think not...
|
|
ant42
Level 3 Rank
Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 129
|
Post by ant42 on Jan 14, 2012 7:07:19 GMT
That 5 minute video on the WUWT link is just downright from the loony asylum.
There is no way he could believe any of that. Whilst he is talking along those lines sceptics need not do anything, he is doing untoild damage himself.
Like the Pinatubo particles, that somehow allowed a 1998 super el nino then has caused the flat line since.
|
|
|
|
Post by trbixler on Jan 14, 2012 13:29:09 GMT
As a reminder he is still being paid by the U.S. government as the head of the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies in New York City. He has the support of Obama and Lisa Jackson.
|
|
|
|
Post by hankslincoln on Jan 16, 2012 19:13:16 GMT
This from an email (climate gate #2 bunch) from Phil Jones.
"I’m not trying to make any sort of point here, just to state that repeating an analysis with exactly the same data is normally very difficult."
Is it easier with different data??
Some how I think I could find a somewhat different objective from Richard Feynman. But then he didn't despise a different scientific conclusion just becasuse it might threaten his grant money.
|
|
|
|
Post by hankslincoln on Jan 30, 2012 20:27:56 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by hankslincoln on Feb 20, 2012 18:49:06 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by hankslincoln on Mar 9, 2012 17:37:55 GMT
|
|
