|
Post by gridley on Aug 23, 2020 14:23:21 GMT
Don't think Biden is going to win. He is barely functioning now, and Trump is probably at the top of his game. Don't believe those manufactured polls, they are static-y nonsense. The purpose of the polls is, like Hillary's failed attempt, to show Democrats winning handily before the actual poll. Then if the polls collapse into a grovelling heap due to late mail shot voting etc etc. The democrats will say "obviously we won the polls have been showing us winning for the last 3 months so Trump was beaten. Any complaints from Republicans will be met with "see we told you he wouldn't accept the result" I would really like Trump to win - or, perhaps more accurately, I really want Biden/Harris to get crushed. But I'll try again - other than optimism, what basis do you have for your prediction that Trump will win? www.270towin.com/2020-election-forecast-predictions/ As of today, EVERY SINGLE ONE of the election forecasts cited at 270 to Win shows Biden with a significant electoral lead. In only a few does he need *any* of the "tossup" states to win. These aren't just estimates based on poll data - some of these people use historical election results, and in some cases I think they read entrails. The polling map is far worse than most of the forecast maps; as of right now it is Biden 291, Trump 119, tossup 128. So per the polling map Trump would not only have to win EVERY tossup state, he'd also have to flip Florida or at least *two* other states that are currently leaning Biden. www.270towin.com/maps/biden-trump-polling-mapHope is not a plan. Edit to add: I'm not trying to crush anyone's hopes; rather the opposite - I'm looking for a *reason* to be hopeful myself. I would be very happy if someone could show me one.
|
|
|
Post by nautonnier on Aug 23, 2020 14:50:12 GMT
The purpose of the polls is, like Hillary's failed attempt, to show Democrats winning handily before the actual poll. Then if the polls collapse into a grovelling heap due to late mail shot voting etc etc. The democrats will say "obviously we won the polls have been showing us winning for the last 3 months so Trump was beaten. Any complaints from Republicans will be met with "see we told you he wouldn't accept the result" I would really like Trump to win - or, perhaps more accurately, I really want Biden/Harris to get crushed. But I'll try again - other than optimism, what basis do you have for your prediction that Trump will win? www.270towin.com/2020-election-forecast-predictions/ As of today, EVERY SINGLE ONE of the election forecasts cited at 270 to Win shows Biden with a significant electoral lead. In only a few does he need *any* of the "tossup" states to win. These aren't just estimates based on poll data - some of these people use historical election results, and in some cases I think they read entrails. The polling map is far worse than most of the forecast maps; as of right now it is Biden 291, Trump 119, tossup 128. So per the polling map Trump would not only have to win EVERY tossup state, he'd also have to flip Florida or at least *two* other states that are currently leaning Biden. www.270towin.com/maps/biden-trump-polling-mapHope is not a plan. Edit to add: I'm not trying to crush anyone's hopes; rather the opposite - I'm looking for a *reason* to be hopeful myself. I would be very happy if someone could show me one. The so called 'cancel culture' with the neue sturmabteilung aka antifa have meant that nobody feels free to disagree. There is a hesitancy to put bumper stickers on cars as they may get damaged in parking lots ... So nobody admits to being republican. Although when feeling safe they may say the other way. I have a strong union man neighbor who in a quiet chat admitted that where before he always voted democrat - he will be voting for Trump. The so called Democrat Convention was very short on detail of what they will do except in broad brush but very high in touchy feely dislike of Trump. Usually starting with unproven invective. I have had several extremely effective bosses who were relatively unpleasant personalities especially if things were not being achieved. The democrats are trying to project a warm cuddly caring image while everyone can see the complete intolerance at local level. The result of the election must not be close as there are already democrat lawyers warming up and probably have their arguments already planned out if the election is as close say as the hanging chad Bush/Gore.
|
|
|
Post by walnut on Aug 23, 2020 16:11:25 GMT
The purpose of the polls is, like Hillary's failed attempt, to show Democrats winning handily before the actual poll. Then if the polls collapse into a grovelling heap due to late mail shot voting etc etc. The democrats will say "obviously we won the polls have been showing us winning for the last 3 months so Trump was beaten. Any complaints from Republicans will be met with "see we told you he wouldn't accept the result" I would really like Trump to win - or, perhaps more accurately, I really want Biden/Harris to get crushed. But I'll try again - other than optimism, what basis do you have for your prediction that Trump will win? www.270towin.com/2020-election-forecast-predictions/ As of today, EVERY SINGLE ONE of the election forecasts cited at 270 to Win shows Biden with a significant electoral lead. In only a few does he need *any* of the "tossup" states to win. These aren't just estimates based on poll data - some of these people use historical election results, and in some cases I think they read entrails. The polling map is far worse than most of the forecast maps; as of right now it is Biden 291, Trump 119, tossup 128. So per the polling map Trump would not only have to win EVERY tossup state, he'd also have to flip Florida or at least *two* other states that are currently leaning Biden. www.270towin.com/maps/biden-trump-polling-mapHope is not a plan. Edit to add: I'm not trying to crush anyone's hopes; rather the opposite - I'm looking for a *reason* to be hopeful myself. I would be very happy if someone could show me one. Oh, I have no plan, or special information. Information is all tainted and suspect. All I gave you was an opinion. But the polls 4 years ago proved to be improperly sampled at best, and intentionally rigged at worst. I doubt that anything has changed since then. The situation is dangerous going forward, the demographic tide is moving left. But this election, it seems that the democrats screwed it up and advanced another flawed ticket. I think they lose again.
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Aug 23, 2020 17:07:09 GMT
The purpose of the polls is, like Hillary's failed attempt, to show Democrats winning handily before the actual poll. Then if the polls collapse into a grovelling heap due to late mail shot voting etc etc. The democrats will say "obviously we won the polls have been showing us winning for the last 3 months so Trump was beaten. Any complaints from Republicans will be met with "see we told you he wouldn't accept the result" I would really like Trump to win - or, perhaps more accurately, I really want Biden/Harris to get crushed. But I'll try again - other than optimism, what basis do you have for your prediction that Trump will win? www.270towin.com/2020-election-forecast-predictions/ As of today, EVERY SINGLE ONE of the election forecasts cited at 270 to Win shows Biden with a significant electoral lead. In only a few does he need *any* of the "tossup" states to win. These aren't just estimates based on poll data - some of these people use historical election results, and in some cases I think they read entrails. The polling map is far worse than most of the forecast maps; as of right now it is Biden 291, Trump 119, tossup 128. So per the polling map Trump would not only have to win EVERY tossup state, he'd also have to flip Florida or at least *two* other states that are currently leaning Biden. www.270towin.com/maps/biden-trump-polling-mapHope is not a plan. Edit to add: I'm not trying to crush anyone's hopes; rather the opposite - I'm looking for a *reason* to be hopeful myself. I would be very happy if someone could show me one. They may indeed read entrails ... sometimes their own (or their employers, kind of like in climate science). An old rule of modeling suggests that you cannot forecast that for which you have no measures (i.e. you do not know what you do not know). They failed in 2016 for the same reasons. Trumpers declined to be measured. Somewhere those old results exist and could be compared to what is currently being prophesized. And they do fall in the realm of prophecy (not saying they are wrong, just betting that way based on past performance). When a national pollster calls, guess what I say. You are right ... hope is not a plan. I plan to join the deplorables either in victory OR as a member of the disloyal resistance. I cannot support Communists and I remember very well what they have done for the last 4 years. Travis said it very well at the Alamo ... and our odds are better than his. There are a lot more of us.
|
|
|
Post by nautonnier on Aug 23, 2020 19:24:38 GMT
With apologies to Monty Python....
VOTER: Never mind that, my lad. I wish to complain about this president what I voted for not half an hour ago from this very boutique.
DNC: Oh yes, the, uh, the Democrat Blue...What's,uh...What's wrong with it?
VOTER: I'll tell you what's wrong with it, my lad. 'E's dead, that's what's wrong with it!
DNC: No, no, 'e's uh,...he's resting.
VOTER: Look, my lad, I know a dead president when I see one, and I'm looking at one right now.
DNC: No no he's not dead, he's, he's restin'! Remarkable politician, the President Blue, idn'it, ay? Beautiful plumage!
VOTER: The plumage don't enter into it. It's stone dead.
DNC: Nononono, no, no! 'E's resting!
|
|
|
Post by nautonnier on Aug 24, 2020 2:29:59 GMT
I am considering voting for neither of the two. Easier to do than "all of the above"
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Aug 24, 2020 22:00:32 GMT
The 2nd of the two Mark Levin videos at this site www.foxnews.com/shows/life-liberty-levin# discusses the election day crisis (and beyond) that will develop. In fact, appears planned to develop. They intend to take it all the way to war.
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Aug 26, 2020 21:30:19 GMT
|
|
|
Post by nautonnier on Aug 27, 2020 0:36:18 GMT
A more adult university would say to those complaining - that they had seen the video and they considered it a joke. Do the students still wish to continue complaining? Any student(s) saying they wanted to continue their complaints should be sent down from the university no second chance no retention or carry over courses all marks zeroed. No refunding of course fees. Nothing like cancelling back.
|
|
|
Post by nautonnier on Aug 28, 2020 15:28:20 GMT
Interesting I had not heard of ID2020 Strange that the date was chosen before the pandemic for which they say a global ID will be required. But see this summary of true information - no tinfoil hats required. You really do wonder what these billionaires are doing with all the time on their hands. "Microsoft who funds ID2020 files patent for the buying and selling of Bitcoin cryptocurrency that works by a device attached to the human body that interacts with a computer network system."humansarefree.com/2020/04/microsoft-funds-id2020-and-filed-patent-for-a-device-connected-to-the-human-body-rfid-microchip-for-buying-and-selling-bitcoin.htmlWhat is not made clear is that the 'sensing body activity' part of the 606060 patent is actually a complex identification system using body activity and AI. So when the system interacts with the implant the output authenticates with the system's stored body activity for that individual. This is an extension of possession of token and knowledge (pass word / check question) this is has microchip that authenticates the body of a live individual. Just right for the ID2020 and the luckily released Pandemic right on time for its implementation.
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Sept 1, 2020 1:12:44 GMT
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Sept 1, 2020 5:06:12 GMT
|
|
|
Post by nautonnier on Sept 1, 2020 11:50:12 GMT
This is why King James first and Cromwell protestants effectively depopulated much of Ireland the papists were hated 'left footers'. "No Irish Need Apply" was common in the USA. Catholics in Britain were second class citizens at best. Then the 'Papists Act' was passed removing legal limits on employment of Catholics in Britain; mainly due to the inability to recruit sufficient numbers for the Royal Navy and Army to fight the war in the American colonies. This led to 'The Gordon Riots' in 1780 that made London look like Portland and for almost as long. Lord George Gordon fomented the riots as the 'papists' were hated. Religion was very much one Anglican protestant religion in UK at the time. One of the reasons for escaping to the colonies was to avoid continual harassment and discrimination due to flavors of protestant or catholicism. It is unsurprising that Freedom of Religion made it into The First Amendment only 9 years after the rioting in Britain.
|
|
|
Post by blustnmtn on Sept 1, 2020 12:25:29 GMT
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Sept 1, 2020 13:39:28 GMT
|
|