|
|
Post by fredzl4dh on Jun 4, 2016 11:34:47 GMT
But they reckon sea levels started to rise 150 years ago after 4000+ of being stable.....surely by that logic human involvement is discounted? Doesn't appear to be the case Acidohm. One just can't help stupid at times....just sayin. You missed two fraudulent science and incompetent science these days it's hard to tell the difference . |
|
|
|
Post by fredzl4dh on Jun 4, 2016 11:40:08 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Ratty on Jun 4, 2016 11:56:12 GMT
Fred, if you can't see any dugout canoes or palm trees, it might not be the Solomons. Just sayin' ..... |
|
|
|
Post by nautonnier on Jun 4, 2016 17:14:44 GMT
Fred, if you can't see any dugout canoes or palm trees, it might not be the Solomons. Just sayin' ..... It's from the other side of the earth so the palm trees and dugout canoes are underneath  |
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Jun 4, 2016 17:16:41 GMT
Fred, if you can't see any dugout canoes or palm trees, it might not be the Solomons. Just sayin' ..... Whatever ... but you better plant a flag on it quick. There's a Chinese fishing boat on the horizon. |
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Jun 15, 2016 13:03:49 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by nautonnier on Jun 15, 2016 15:12:41 GMT
Now work out the rather significant amount of energy required to melt that amount of ice. And justify why it is thought that the poles will be permanently above freezing.
|
|
|
|
Post by phydeaux2363 on Jun 15, 2016 15:37:40 GMT
At least L.A. won't be destroyed in an earthquake! |
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Jun 15, 2016 15:59:09 GMT
At least L.A. won't be destroyed in an earthquake! Nope. It'll be more like watching a blender! Shake, slosh and roll. |
|
|
|
Post by acidohm on Jun 15, 2016 19:59:49 GMT
So Kevin costners water world wasn't very accurate then :/ |
|
|
|
Post by sigurdur on Aug 10, 2016 4:30:08 GMT
|
|
van
Level 2 Rank
Posts: 59
|
Post by van on Aug 10, 2016 12:42:29 GMT
So is Hansen back-stepping on his anthropogenic global warming narrative?
|
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Aug 10, 2016 13:01:02 GMT
So is Hansen back-stepping on his anthropogenic global warming narrative? Perhaps cashing out his capital gains in preparation for the inevitable CO2 market crash ... 2017 to 2022??? Reputation laundering for those golden sunset years. |
|
|
|
Post by sigurdur on Aug 10, 2016 13:10:02 GMT
So is Hansen back-stepping on his anthropogenic global warming narrative? Seems that he is. |
|
|
|
Post by walnut on Aug 10, 2016 14:34:17 GMT
The AGW crowd won't even consider admitting that the science is not settled, so they are a long way from conceding that they were actually WRONG. But that article is encouraging
|
|
