|
Post by AstroMet on Apr 1, 2015 17:46:07 GMT
Pretty much what I expected Sigurdur.
|
|
|
Post by AstroMet on Apr 5, 2015 22:26:11 GMT
|
|
|
Post by sigurdur on Apr 6, 2015 16:52:01 GMT
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Apr 7, 2015 1:28:33 GMT
Yes ... interesting. I think they need another order in their equation. They're missing the start of that 3rd bend. Don't know how many stations they're using ... but they may also be affected by some, shall we say, spurious stations ... to put it politely. 2014 seems to be skewing the current end of their scale, Where did that come from? 2012 was our recent hot summer!!!!!
|
|
|
Post by sigurdur on Apr 7, 2015 1:54:18 GMT
Yes ... interesting. I think they need another order in their equation. They're missing the start of that 3rd bend. Don't know how many stations they're using ... but they may also be affected by some, shall we say, spurious stations ... to put it politely. 2014 seems to be skewing the current end of their scale, Where did that come from? 2012 was our recent hot summer!!!!! I haven't dug into the site Missouriboy. I figured it would be of interest to some who read the board. Information is always important.
|
|
|
Post by sigurdur on Apr 7, 2015 1:56:04 GMT
Tomorrow is the last day to change base acres, yield and selection of ARC-CO, PLC or ARC-IC.
ARC-CO looks like the way to go for Corn/Soybeans/Wheat
PLC for barley.
|
|
|
Post by AstroMet on Apr 15, 2015 23:03:30 GMT
Thanks Codewhacker, as I am sure it will be helpful for farmers in these changing times.
|
|
|
Post by AstroMet on Apr 16, 2015 17:43:50 GMT
California has at least until 2018 before it sees significant precipitation enough to counter the drought Code, so this multi-year drought has a way to go.
|
|
|
Post by sigurdur on Apr 24, 2015 15:34:25 GMT
|
|
|
Post by nonentropic on Apr 24, 2015 17:21:00 GMT
You don't need a CAGW event to see most of the proposals as good and interesting land practice.
But how do you make those aspirations mainstream. A concept that has worked for years is making them economic, that is not subsidized but actually interesting to people like Sig. In all places on planet earth.
Taking working peoples money in the form of tax to give to subsidy snatchers is a recipe for failure.
The old formulae of hard work, innovation, stable rewarding profitable business environment is a little less popular but I suggest the only proven way to get this stuff done.
|
|
|
Post by sigurdur on Apr 24, 2015 22:35:58 GMT
You don't need a CAGW event to see most of the proposals as good and interesting land practice. But how do you make those aspirations mainstream. A concept that has worked for years is making them economic, that is not subsidized but actually interesting to people like Sig. In all places on planet earth. Taking working peoples money in the form of tax to give to subsidy snatchers is a recipe for failure. The old formulae of hard work, innovation, stable rewarding profitable business environment is a little less popular but I suggest the only proven way to get this stuff done. Good question. Funny thing is, farmers already do the things mentioned. I wish the HUB thing was defunded. Another waste of money we don't have.
|
|
|
Post by nautonnier on Apr 25, 2015 10:26:36 GMT
You don't need a CAGW event to see most of the proposals as good and interesting land practice. But how do you make those aspirations mainstream. A concept that has worked for years is making them economic, that is not subsidized but actually interesting to people like Sig. In all places on planet earth. Taking working peoples money in the form of tax to give to subsidy snatchers is a recipe for failure. The old formulae of hard work, innovation, stable rewarding profitable business environment is a little less popular but I suggest the only proven way to get this stuff done. Good question. Funny thing is, farmers already do the things mentioned. I wish the HUB thing was defunded. Another waste of money we don't have. The next thing is a 'questionnaire' asking if you agree that these land practices make sense. That will be followed by a report saying 97% of farmers agree that these actions are sensible and need to be taken due to global warming/climate change.
|
|
|
Post by sigurdur on Apr 28, 2015 0:17:40 GMT
|
|
|
Post by sigurdur on May 1, 2015 13:00:35 GMT
|
|