|
Post by sigurdur on Jan 7, 2019 19:07:47 GMT
|
|
|
Post by walnut on Jan 31, 2019 15:38:45 GMT
Candidate Trump floated the idea of simply defaulting on the bonds. He casually mentioned that as an option. Easy to believe, I think that he more or less built his wealth by successfully absconding on real estate deals. That is his main move.
So, maybe there really is no one at the wheel. I think that the Hapsburgs and Rothchilds conspiracies are more comforting.
|
|
|
Post by walnut on Feb 1, 2019 4:31:09 GMT
Those 3 are absolute kooks. I can remember when everyone knew that Sanders was a carnival sideshow. Schultz actually looks attractive at this point.
|
|
|
Post by sigurdur on Feb 1, 2019 18:03:05 GMT
|
|
|
Post by sigurdur on Feb 14, 2019 9:06:27 GMT
We went over the cliff with President Obama. Trump hasn't opened a parachute to enable a soft landing.
|
|
|
Post by sigurdur on Feb 21, 2019 15:14:12 GMT
Not a good sign!
|
|
|
Post by sigurdur on Feb 27, 2019 2:25:50 GMT
|
|
|
Post by sigurdur on Mar 2, 2019 21:34:43 GMT
There is a bit more history here that needs to be remembered. The IPCC/global warming idea originated in Britain during the Thatcher administration. She didn't like the coal miners union, and wanted to break it. At the time, coal was in demand for house heating as well as industrial scale electrical generation. By starting the process of "coal is bad", it would have decreased demand, and broke the unions. It actually WAS a factor in that happening. I don't believe for a second that Thatcher understood the ramifications of what her administration started. She was endorsed in her actions by President Reagan.
Today, we have a booming climate change industry based on a false premise.
|
|
|
Post by sigurdur on Mar 11, 2019 15:23:51 GMT
Really is the crap isn't it?   ??
|
|
|
Post by sigurdur on Jun 15, 2019 14:48:26 GMT
Adding fuel to the fire it seems?
|
|
|
Post by sigurdur on Aug 11, 2019 15:29:08 GMT
How much did China pay for that op-ed?
|
|
|
Post by sigurdur on Sept 14, 2019 17:03:43 GMT
I have realized for some time that the fiscal cliff is in the rear view mirror. What will the outcome be? I don't see any outcome that will be positive.
Today, during Democrat debates, the talk is about guns, and how much more money they can spend. Not a thing about reducing Govt expenditures and raising taxes to prevent the outcome ahead. Damn sad!!!
|
|
|
Post by sigurdur on Sept 15, 2019 13:45:09 GMT
I have realized for some time that the fiscal cliff is in the rear view mirror. What will the outcome be? I don't see any outcome that will be positive. Today, during Democrat debates, the talk is about guns, and how much more money they can spend. Not a thing about reducing Govt expenditures and raising taxes to prevent the outcome ahead. Damn sad!!! If the D's win the election and the economy tanks guess who they will blame? It will never be themselves.
|
|
|
Post by sigurdur on Nov 2, 2019 1:44:41 GMT
|
|
|
Post by sigurdur on Dec 9, 2019 14:38:57 GMT
A recession doesn't appear to be in the cards any time soon. This will assure President Trump's re-election.
|
|