|
Post by sigurdur on Nov 14, 2020 20:28:26 GMT
/photo/1
twitter.com/RitaPanahi/status/1327691853982883840/photo/1
|
|
|
Post by Ratty on Nov 16, 2020 8:30:52 GMT
|
|
|
Post by nautonnier on Dec 23, 2020 22:18:17 GMT
|
|
|
Post by nautonnier on Dec 24, 2020 15:53:57 GMT
|
|
|
Post by nautonnier on Dec 31, 2020 21:58:45 GMT
|
|
|
Post by nautonnier on Jan 1, 2021 20:29:58 GMT
"Why Is President Trump So Calm? Sometimes The Simplest Explanation Is The Right One…
This is something I’ve touched on many times in recent articles and in my Newsletter.
It’s something I can’t quite get over.
There is a lot happening right now that doesn’t make sense.
I think there are a lot of dots out there not yet connected and the fog of war is making things hard to see.
But one thing we can see and to me it’s been one of the most glaring clues of anything….
It’s how absolutely calm (and quiet) President Trump has been since the election.
Have you noticed it?
Almost to the point of seeming disengaged.
Yes, he’s given a couple big press conferences.
Yes, he still goes on some Tweet storms.
But overall he seems fairly calm and complacent.
And that means one of two things:
Either (1) he’s lost and he’s basically admitted defeat and he’s just riding out the time until January 20.
Or (2) he has it ALL and he’s just letting them continue to hang themselves and he’s he will play the “Trump” card when he’s damn well good and ready.
Given his Tweet storms and continuing legal challenges, #1 just doesn’t ring true to me.
So that means it must be #2….and can you even imagine?
I’ve actually been saying it all along.
President Trump looks to me like a man who already holds all the cards and he knows it.
Remember all the things we’re not hearing about anymore.
Remember the raid on the Scytl server in Frankfurt, Germany?
Did that give him all the real election results, undeniable proof of Trump’s win?
Remember how he watched the election results live in that SCIFF and then Tweeted out that he watched the fraud happen live in realtime on election night?
Will it be the watermarked ballots?
Don’t forget about all these gems!
Well, enough of me rambling.
My friend Daniel Lee read an article from someone who pieced this all together much better than I just did.
It’s absolutely incredible and you have to hear it."Video and Complete text - here: welovetrump.com/2020/12/29/why-is-president-trump-so-calm-sometimes-the-simplest-explanation-is-the-right-one/
|
|
|
Post by nautonnier on Jan 5, 2021 22:48:24 GMT
This might be interesting to watch - set your DVRs and alarms
|
|
|
Post by nautonnier on Jan 6, 2021 12:47:37 GMT
|
|
|
Post by glennkoks on Jan 7, 2021 3:06:50 GMT
Well to answer the thread question. Can Trump survive.
No
|
|
|
Post by nautonnier on Jan 9, 2021 15:31:31 GMT
|
|
|
Post by nautonnier on Jan 9, 2021 15:42:47 GMT
Well to answer the thread question. Can Trump survive. No Perhaps but Social Media is in a frenzy of shutdowns of anyone connected with Trump and any site/platform that they often use. That would seem to indicate that they are really scared of something
|
|
|
Post by glennkoks on Jan 9, 2021 16:13:36 GMT
I hate any restriction of free speech. I have been banned by more than one site for my views.
With that being said Twitter, Facebook and Instagram are not public and can enforce their rules and terms of service as they see fit.
As consumers we do not have to visit these sites either...
|
|
|
Post by nautonnier on Jan 9, 2021 16:36:12 GMT
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Jan 9, 2021 17:42:23 GMT
I hate any restriction of free speech. I have been banned by more than one site for my views. With that being said Twitter, Facebook and Instagram are not public and can enforce their rules and terms of service as they see fit. As consumers we do not have to visit these sites either... I agree with your first seven words... but with modifications. Regardless of what SCOTUS says, companies are not individuals. The rise of huge tech, concentrated in a small number of companies, is seemingly doing everything it can to control the vehicles by which REAL people can speak. A big setback in the viability of free speech, was the total defeat of the concept of net neutrality ... which gave the tech lords the power to "parcel out" control to those whom they wished. In the 18th and 19th centuries, the vehicle for the rise of an American Middle Class was the either free or low cost aquisition of land west of the Appalachians. This was possible because title was vested in the Federal Government, which by policy set very lucrative terms for parceling it out individual citizens. If the Government had "given" the land to a small group of oligarchs, how different this might have been. I argue that the NEW digital frontier is, or could have been, the 21st century frontier, to be settled by a new generation of small digital "entrepreneurs" as the airwaves (if that is still a proper term) should belong to the Government in the interest of the public. The rights of individual to access these frontiers should be just as protected as speach ... and the new oligarchs of the airwaves should be as heavily regulated as, let's say, an electric utility. Businesses / Corporate enties are NOT individuals, and have NO rights an individual is bound to respect. Business or corporate owners, as individuals, have rights which are bound to be respected ... and are subject to restrictions similar to every other citizen. When these non-human entities exceed certain thresholds, they should be broken up to discourage the suppression of competition due to size, versud competence.
|
|
|
Post by youngjasper on Jan 9, 2021 17:55:46 GMT
I hate any restriction of free speech. I have been banned by more than one site for my views. With that being said Twitter, Facebook and Instagram are not public and can enforce their rules and terms of service as they see fit. As consumers we do not have to visit these sites either... Glenn, I agree with you on restriction of free speech. I also agree that twitter et al are private companies and can enforce their rules as they see fit. BUT if they elect restrict speech, essentially becoming publishers. Since they are now publishers they should immediately lose the protection from Section 230, which protects them from being sued by the content put on their platform by others. That is what Trump wanted to accomplish with twitter et al, removal of the Section 230 protections.
|
|