|
Post by sigurdur on Jun 19, 2021 2:41:07 GMT
|
|
|
Post by sigurdur on Jun 20, 2021 14:15:41 GMT
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Jun 20, 2021 15:58:06 GMT
|
|
|
Post by duwayne on Jun 20, 2021 16:58:38 GMT
There are many positive studies showing Ivermectin works for reducing COVID. Has anyone seen any negative data for Ivermectin?
|
|
|
Post by sigurdur on Jun 20, 2021 18:20:58 GMT
There are many positive studies showing Ivermectin works for reducing COVID. Has anyone seen any negative data for Ivermectin? Ivermectin is similar to Hydrochloroquine. Both are old drugs with minimal side effects. I haven't read of any negative outcomes. There has to be some somewhere. The puzzle is falling into place a bit. IF there are drugs available to treat Covid19, the emergency use would not have been granted. There is a small segment of the population at large, based on demographics etc, that won't be getting the shot. They are the control group. Long term side effects for the jab are unknown. Children seem to express short term side effects. What is troubling is, if they contract Covid19, lingering side effects are very rare. The jab? 30% heart inflammation? I will continue to volunteer to be in the control group.
|
|
|
Post by Ratty on Jun 20, 2021 21:58:26 GMT
Thanks Sig; I sent this to my email list: Ivermectin for Prevention and Treatment of COVID-19 InfectionA Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Trial Sequential Analysis to Inform Clinical GuidelinesResearchers: Bryant, Andrew MSc 1,*; Lawrie, Theresa A. MBBCh, PhD2; Dowswell, Therese PhD 2; Fordham, Edmund J. PhD 2; Mitchell, Scott MBChB, MRCS 3; Hill, Sarah R. PhD 1; Tham, Tony C. MD, FRCP 4Author Information 1 Division of Gastroenterology, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom; 2 Division of Gastroenterology, Evidence-based Medicine Consultancy, Bath, United Kingdom; 3 Emergency Department, Princess Elizabeth Hospital, Guernsey, United Kingdom; and 4 Division of Gastroenterology, Ulster Hospital, Dundonald, Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom. Address for correspondence: Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Baddiley-Clark Building, Richardson Road, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE2 4AX, United Kingdom. E-mail: andy.bryant@ncl.ac.uk The preprint of this review received no funding. This updated version was funded by the crowdfunding initiative www.gofundme.com/f/help-us-get-lifesaving-drug-approved-for-covid19The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. Please watch VIDEO at tinyurl.com/hcvbduxp The search for a treatment for Covid-19 What is ivermectin? Please see the evidence. Visit www.e-bmc.co.uk and www.thebird-group.org and www.covid19criticalcare.com and www.ivmmeta.com
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Jun 21, 2021 3:23:35 GMT
|
|
|
Post by sigurdur on Jun 21, 2021 12:37:13 GMT
|
|
|
Post by nemesis on Jun 21, 2021 15:42:57 GMT
There are many positive studies showing Ivermectin works for reducing COVID. Has anyone seen any negative data for Ivermectin? Ivermectin is similar to Hydrochloroquine. Both are old drugs with minimal side effects. I haven't read of any negative outcomes. There has to be some somewhere. The puzzle is falling into place a bit. IF there are drugs available to treat Covid19, the emergency use would not have been granted. There is a small segment of the population at large, based on demographics etc, that won't be getting the shot. They are the control group. Long term side effects for the jab are unknown. Children seem to express short term side effects. What is troubling is, if they contract Covid19, lingering side effects are very rare. The jab? 30% heart inflammation? I will continue to volunteer to be in the control group. From my perspective (here in UK), they seem to be trying very hard to eliminate any unvaccinated 'control' group by insisting it's safe for all and even now targeting school age children. Hmm, I wonder why.
|
|
|
Post by sigurdur on Jun 21, 2021 16:20:28 GMT
Ivermectin is similar to Hydrochloroquine. Both are old drugs with minimal side effects. I haven't read of any negative outcomes. There has to be some somewhere. The puzzle is falling into place a bit. IF there are drugs available to treat Covid19, the emergency use would not have been granted. There is a small segment of the population at large, based on demographics etc, that won't be getting the shot. They are the control group. Long term side effects for the jab are unknown. Children seem to express short term side effects. What is troubling is, if they contract Covid19, lingering side effects are very rare. The jab? 30% heart inflammation? I will continue to volunteer to be in the control group. From my perspective (here in UK), they seem to be trying very hard to eliminate any unvaccinated 'control' group by insisting it's safe for all and even now targeting school age children. Hmm, I wonder why. I really don't understand the haste to inoculate children.
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Jun 21, 2021 16:25:01 GMT
From my perspective (here in UK), they seem to be trying very hard to eliminate any unvaccinated 'control' group by insisting it's safe for all and even now targeting school age children. Hmm, I wonder why. I really don't understand the haste to inoculate children. It is essential to Authoritarianism that all participate.
|
|
|
Post by sigurdur on Jun 21, 2021 16:30:58 GMT
I really don't understand the haste to inoculate children. It is essential to Authoritarianism that all participate. Truth.
|
|
|
Post by sigurdur on Jun 21, 2021 21:28:34 GMT
|
|
|
Post by nautonnier on Jun 22, 2021 1:11:56 GMT
To sum up that paper - FauXi and other medical bureaucrats who stand to make $millions out of vaccines will lose it all if a therapeutic that works is identified. So they initiate a narrative to be followed by 'big tech' that unless they give the therapeutic their 'nod' the information on it must be memory holed below Hunter's lap top. This 'narrative direction' is then passed to the media-studies grads working in 'Big Tech' who mindlessly apply the filters - leading to the unnecessary painful deaths of millions worldwide. But who cares? FauXi's bank balance is swelling nicely as is Uncle 'The Big Man' Joe's and it is their wealth that they consider of overriding importance. The WEF under Klaus Schwab has a similar view vaccines and associated passports are the way that they expect to manage the proles who will own nothing and like it as they ' build back better' for the WEF billionaires. So therapeutics are not the WEF idea of the way forward either.
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Jun 23, 2021 3:49:13 GMT
Imperial College just can't seem to get anything close to accurate. Covid antibody rates more than 50 per cent higher than roadmap predictions
In February, Imperial College warned that only 44.6 per cent of the population would be protected by the original lockdown release day of June 21. But the latest figures from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) show that eight in 10 people over the age of 16 now have antibodies to Covid. news.yahoo.com/antibody-rates-more-50-per-135908268.html
|
|