|
Post by missouriboy on Mar 28, 2021 1:35:46 GMT
Well ... if that materializes, someone is going to have to update the limits. And then someone is going to have to 'splain it. I am really looking forward to the attempts to explain massive changes in pressure patterns based on very small changes in CO2. Somebody really ought to fund that carnival. And require all publically funded airwaves and other media to carry it. In the interest of science of course. The Woke of course would fall asleep. But those who have been sucking off the public trough all these years, whilst publishing pablum, and speaking as God's chosen angels, should be required to make their best case (all of them). And if they can, then so be it. If not, might Robespierre request their company?
|
|
|
Post by sigurdur on Mar 28, 2021 4:57:47 GMT
So strange things afoot?? The pressure over Greenland broke the model GFS on a recent run....it only recognises up to 1070mb. There's a large area in the high pressure un designated....the 1070 line stops and the pool within contains no readings 😲 I am not liking this.
|
|
|
Post by acidohm on Mar 28, 2021 7:00:33 GMT
Well ... if that materializes, someone is going to have to update the limits. And then someone is going to have to 'splain it. I am really looking forward to the attempts to explain massive changes in pressure patterns based on very small changes in CO2. Somebody really ought to fund that carnival. And require all publically funded airwaves and other media to carry it. In the interest of science of course. The Woke of course would fall asleep. But those who have been sucking off the public trough all these years, whilst publishing pablum, and speaking as God's chosen angels, should be required to make their best case (all of them). And if they can, then so be it. If not, might Robespierre request their company? Arctic ice isn't that low, arctic air isn't really warm. The amplification thing will probably be raised but based on evidence it's looking like a weak explanation.
|
|
|
Post by acidohm on Mar 28, 2021 7:15:50 GMT
High pressure values over 1070 still breaking gfs, that's a jaw dropping block over Greenland, literally it's not been anticipated that the model output would be required to resolve values at that level!
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Mar 28, 2021 13:41:07 GMT
Logical explanations based on current phenomena?
|
|
|
Post by acidohm on Mar 28, 2021 17:40:40 GMT
Logical explanations based on current phenomena? Low solar drives high level blocking. Don't know the mechanism 🤷🏼♂️
|
|
|
Post by Ratty on Mar 28, 2021 21:45:19 GMT
Logical explanations based on current phenomena? Low solar drives high level blocking. Don't know the mechanism 🤷🏼♂️ Here you go ....
|
|
|
Post by nonentropic on Mar 28, 2021 22:52:35 GMT
Don Easterbrook has a solid explanation.
|
|
|
Post by acidohm on Mar 29, 2021 5:14:17 GMT
Don Easterbrook has a solid explanation. Gotta link Non??
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Mar 29, 2021 13:19:06 GMT
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Mar 29, 2021 13:21:16 GMT
And THUS ... the term BLOCKHEAD? Low solar drives high level blocking. Don't know the mechanism 🤷🏼♂️ Here you go ....
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Mar 29, 2021 16:03:39 GMT
Just drove through central Tennessee on 3/24-3/25 at the very start of this flood cycle. Decided not to stop and drove all night to stay ahead of this. Seems to be persisting. www.youtube.com/watch?v=1qVhggSL9as
|
|
|
Post by acidohm on Mar 31, 2021 9:07:07 GMT
Atmosphere is looking highly irregular next week.....
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Apr 4, 2021 6:08:29 GMT
Just driving back from Florida. The last couple of days seem abnormally chilly ... 40s lows and 60s highs. Locals were putting on coats. Me too.
|
|
|
Post by Ratty on Apr 4, 2021 7:37:23 GMT
Just driving back from Florida. The last couple of days seem abnormally chilly ... 40s lows and 60s highs. Locals were putting on coats. Me too. In the words of a famous man, "Don't sell your coats."
|
|