|
Post by icefisher on May 21, 2009 17:30:16 GMT
I'm still twitching - this page doesn't mention Christy at all! I can't help you if you can't read Steve.
|
|
|
Post by steve on May 22, 2009 12:01:03 GMT
I'm still twitching - this page doesn't mention Christy at all! I can't help you if you can't read Steve. Curious. Yesterday, my browser did not display the comment with the letter. But the original article said How can you think that you single link, that claims that Christy is linked to a lobbyist organisation, backs up the specific accusation in the article that there is a widely held opinion that Christy's research is oil-funded?
|
|
|
Post by icefisher on May 22, 2009 12:45:44 GMT
I can't help you if you can't read Steve. Curious. Yesterday, my browser did not display the comment with the letter. But the original article said How can you think that you single link, that claims that Christy is linked to a lobbyist organisation, backs up the specific accusation in the article that there is a widely held opinion that Christy's research is oil-funded? You said a cursory internet search would prove your point. So that is what I did. I searched on two variations of "Christy oil funded". The first time I did it the first link that seemed to qualify turned out to be the Greenpeace site, the second time I did it I came up with the desmo site. Sounds like a cursory internet search to me . . . .and clearly demonstrates you were talking through your hat.
|
|
|
Post by steve on May 22, 2009 15:55:03 GMT
Curious. Yesterday, my browser did not display the comment with the letter. But the original article said How can you think that you single link, that claims that Christy is linked to a lobbyist organisation, backs up the specific accusation in the article that there is a widely held opinion that Christy's research is oil-funded? You said a cursory internet search would prove your point. So that is what I did. I searched on two variations of "Christy oil funded". The first time I did it the first link that seemed to qualify turned out to be the Greenpeace site, the second time I did it I came up with the desmo site. Sounds like a cursory internet search to me . . . .and clearly demonstrates you were talking through your hat. So no incorrect claims in the blogosphere that John Christy's research is funded by oil, or that he has received oil funding. Glad that's settled.
|
|
|
Post by icefisher on May 22, 2009 23:16:33 GMT
So no incorrect claims in the blogosphere that John Christy's research is funded by oil, or that he has received oil funding. Glad that's settled. Certainly would not want to put any cracks in your Al Gore Sycophancy Commode.
|
|
|
Post by steve on May 23, 2009 10:33:48 GMT
So no incorrect claims in the blogosphere that John Christy's research is funded by oil, or that he has received oil funding. Glad that's settled. Certainly would not want to put any cracks in your Al Gore Sycophancy Commode. I claim a Go[re]dwin's Law win.
|
|
|
Post by icefisher on May 23, 2009 14:33:14 GMT
Certainly would not want to put any cracks in your Al Gore Sycophancy Commode. I claim a Go[re]dwin's Law win. Whatever it takes to not derail your future working your way to wintering in Los Angeles and a the-world-is-doomed soapbox in Pershing Square.
|
|