Experiment to Uncover Secrets of 'Big Bang'

[m3jzt]

Fear Looms Over Scientist's Experiment to Uncover Secrets of 'Big Bang'
A British physicist has claimed he can explain the secrets of the Big Bang Theory, but his controversial experiment has scientists believing he could bring about the end of the world, the U.K.'s Daily Mail reported.
Evans' ambitions, however, have brought widespread concern among scientists who say the experiment could create a shower of unstable black holes inside the Earth, and subsequently bring destruction to the planet.

www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,418204,00.html

[Ole Doc Sief]

I wonder what would be the time from from generation of a shower of antimatter till destruction?

[kelken]

Though they are firing accelerators on Wednesday it will be at low intensities, they will not be able to actually engage in proton collision at energies we have done before until end of this year or next year, depending on law suits and so forth do not inhibit there time line. So first they have to reach what we have emulated before before proceeding to the high energy impacts that could be dangerous as Rossler argues.

So definitely something to follow and watch

Dr. Otto E. Rossler says a minimum of 4 years to basically "eat the planet from within".......but we would not know it unless it evaporates like Stephen Hawking's Theory of black holes.

LHC Facts-interview w/ Rossler
Large Hadron Collider Safety Facts

www.lhcfacts.org/?cat=27

2012-that onymous year again

[Ole Doc Sief]

Isn't it amazing how misdirected the news organizations are in this manner! I agree that it may never happen, but it is fun to speculate how bent out of shape everyone will get before they are even up to our current energy levels.

[kiwistonewall]

The general consensus of Scientists says its quite safe.
(* putting finishing touches to escape rocket*)

[Pooh]

What an interesting application of the "Precautionary Principle".

On the one hand, CO₂ -driven AGW and "tipping-points" demand immediate disastrous steps to avoid catastrophe.
On the other hand, let us not be concerned about becoming a black hole. Let us trust Stephen Hawking is right; they will evaporate.
As kiwistonewall observes, both decisions represent scientific consensus, so we are all-good.

According to Chuck Swindoll, even now there is a meeting going on deciding your future, and you (and I) are not invited. ;D

[kiwistonewall]

The Babel Machine? (cf the Tower of Babel)

If you recall the myth, the tower of Babel was Man's attempt to build a tower to heaven - and God stepped in and destroyed it.

The is the second time that a major failure has set things back months. (There was some other failure about a year ago when they first tried to start it up.)

Maybe God knows what will happen?

Next time is third time lucky?
;D

[tiles]

if this particle accelerator thing over in Geneva isn't working, then how come I'm waking up to a large hadron every morning?

[elien]

Cern is toast. The only thing they proved by breaking it is that they don't grok EM. It had no scientific base behind it in the first place, just the rumblings of some idiots. Higgs and whoever risks his name on something fictional is a vain fool so I think this depiction suits him nicely. Now that money dried up, don't expect anything out of it besides ridicule.



PS And it created a black hole that sucked $6Bn.