|
Post by nautonnier on Jan 3, 2019 13:21:18 GMT
It's from a 'denier' site Naut. Disregard it. Just warning you so you have time to get snow skis and ice skates ready - oh and a new coat
|
|
|
Post by Ratty on Jan 3, 2019 13:26:02 GMT
It's from a 'denier' site Naut. Disregard it. Just warning you so you have time to get snow skis and ice skates ready - oh and a new coat It will never happen here .... I recall the last ice age and we were clear.
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Jan 3, 2019 20:49:23 GMT
A Bit of TriviaIt's year end and I'm updating my UAH satellite temperature anomaly time series. And I noticed something that had escaped me before. There is a difference in the anomaly trends for oceans and land ... for both the lower and middle troposphere. To emphasize this difference I created an anomaly between anomalies, i.e. I subtracted the global ocean anomaly from the global land anomaly. What it seems to show is that, from the mid-1990s to about 2008, satellite measured temperatures over land area grew at a faster rate than temperatures over the oceans. Since 2008, the land-ocean anomaly has been declining in both the Lower and Middle Troposphere ... but it has been declining at a faster pace in the Middle Troposphere.
|
|
|
Post by sigurdur on Jan 4, 2019 0:32:38 GMT
Yep.
|
|
|
Post by Ratty on Jan 4, 2019 1:01:37 GMT
|
|
|
Post by nautonnier on Jan 4, 2019 21:10:39 GMT
I had difficulty reading the paper due to the unnecessary ritual genuflection to climate 'science' shibboleths in the first sentence of the abstract.
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Jan 4, 2019 23:19:17 GMT
I had difficulty reading the paper due to the unnecessary ritual genuflection to climate 'science' shibboleths in the first sentence of the abstract. I suppose that that cooling was due to a lack of CO2 ... in which case, we saved the planet. A little respect please IPCC.
|
|
|
Post by Ratty on Jan 5, 2019 0:00:01 GMT
[ Snip ] I had difficulty reading the paper due to the unnecessary ritual genuflection to climate 'science' shibboleths in the first sentence of the abstract. before the onset of modern anthropogenic warming is from the global warming stock phrases subscription database. Don't let it upset you Naut.
|
|
|
Post by blustnmtn on Jan 11, 2019 14:56:03 GMT
How fast are the oceans warming? Lijing Cheng1, John Abraham2, Zeke Hausfather3, Kevin E. Trenberth4 Science 11 Jan 2019: Vol. 363, Issue 6423, pp. 128-129 DOI: 10.1126/science.aav7619 science.sciencemag.org/content/363/6423/128.summarySummary: "Climate change from human activities mainly results from the energy imbalance in Earth's climate system caused by rising concentrations of heat-trapping gases. About 93% of the energy imbalance accumulates in the ocean as increased ocean heat content (OHC). The ocean record of this imbalance is much less affected by internal variability and is thus better suited for detecting and attributing human influences (1) than more commonly used surface temperature records. Recent observation-based estimates show rapid warming of Earth's oceans over the past few decades (see the figure) (1, 2). This warming has contributed to increases in rainfall intensity, rising sea levels, the destruction of coral reefs, declining ocean oxygen levels, and declines in ice sheets; glaciers; and ice caps in the polar regions (3, 4). Recent estimates of observed warming resemble those seen in models, indicating that models reliably project changes in OHC." www.sciencemag.org/about/science-licenses-journal-article-reuseI believe there are excellent papers that refute each and every one of those CAGW standard claims. Did Al Gore co-author this articles?
|
|
|
Post by blustnmtn on Jan 14, 2019 17:32:41 GMT
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Jan 15, 2019 2:54:48 GMT
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, VOL. 28, NO. 9, PAGES 1735-1738, MAY 1, 2001 Impact of Geothermal Heating on the Global Ocean Circulation agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2000GL012182Wunsch is cited in the Curry piece as estimating geothermal as nearly 20% of heat inputs ... but I can't yet find Wunsch.
|
|
|
Post by nautonnier on Jan 15, 2019 9:49:18 GMT
From the JC post: In an article about the Cheng et al. paper at Inside Climate News, Gavin Schmidt made the following statement:
“The biggest takeaway is that these are things that we predicted as a community 30 years ago,” Schmidt said. “And as we’ve understood the system more and as our data has become more refined and our methodologies more complete, what we’re finding is that, yes, we did know what we were talking about 30 years ago, and we still know what we’re talking about now.”Confirmation bias in action - or to precis what Gavin said - yes that's what we expected from AGW which we hear repeatedly regardless of the finding. And is only to be expected if you build models to reflect your expectation that 2+2=5. As Willis has pointed out the error bars in reality are many times greater than the variance in temperature that they claim to have found. So their accuracy is very low perhaps measured in whole degrees C and so their precision in thousandths of a degree is only there to impress the gullible.
|
|
|
Post by blustnmtn on Jan 17, 2019 13:46:24 GMT
|
|
|
Post by nautonnier on Jan 17, 2019 22:20:30 GMT
Heat as shown by SST seems to have left the Pacific. In fact things are looking a little cool.
|
|
|
Post by nautonnier on Jan 23, 2019 22:08:21 GMT
From Tallblokes Talkshop and picked up by Chiefio E.M.Smith.... "And there, the discussion is about the red cycle blobs of seasonal warming, not about the overall trend. Yet when I look at it, the big feature I see is that the ocean is getting colder. The red seasonal heating is shrinking, year over year, and the deep dark blue is getting greater and colder year over year.
It is from: www.climate4you.com/images/ArgoTimeSeriesTemp59N.GIF
Where the name implies this is Argo data. I presume “59N” means from 59 degrees North."chiefio.wordpress.com/2019/01/23/what-ocean-warming/
|
|