|
|
Post by goldbuster1 on May 11, 2010 14:40:42 GMT
Earth is a round magnet reacting with another round magnet: Sun As the sun position in the sky varies following a 8 shape during the year as per : www.perseus.gr/Astro-Solar-Analemma.htmLets consider the following: A repulsion of a round magnet will push the repulsed magnetic pole at the point to expose the attracting pole creating an attraction, this attraction will bring back the Earth towards the Sun until the repulsing pole is exposed, pushing the repulsed magnetic pole until the attracting pole is exposed, bringing the Earth back to the Sun... So Earth is always tilting back and forth explaining Analemma. If the Sun magnetic field is getting stronger or lower it will affects the speed of pole transition of Earth. The solstices are the point were the Earth is moving back towards the Sun. Earth map was developed in the 1700 and since then we are using that as a ruler, we had to always adjust our maps since then adjusting to the Magnetic pole movements. How do you explain Analemma if the Axial tilt is permanent? A round magnet experiment should be done in free fall to validate my point. |
|
|
|
Post by throttleup on May 11, 2010 17:07:39 GMT
Have you ever considered Analemma?
No, but a lobotomy sounds pretty good about now...
|
|
|
|
Post by goldbuster1 on May 11, 2010 17:14:46 GMT
Have you ever considered Analemma? No, but a lobotomy sounds pretty good about now... Have you never played with magnets? How old are you? What are you doing here? |
|
|
|
Post by hunter on May 11, 2010 18:33:22 GMT
Have you ever considered Analemma? No, but a lobotomy sounds pretty good about now... Ignoring him is cheaper and fraught with fewer ethical dlilemmas. |
|
|
|
Post by goldbuster1 on May 11, 2010 18:44:52 GMT
Have you ever considered Analemma? No, but a lobotomy sounds pretty good about now... Ignoring him is cheaper and fraught with fewer ethical dlilemmas. Any facts to add to this post hunter, or you will use insults again to hide your ignorance or your AWG belief? Since Im here you never add any factual consistence to this forum Why are you here? Trolling and insulting? |
|
|
|
Post by hunter on May 11, 2010 18:47:18 GMT
Ignoring him is cheaper and fraught with fewer ethical dlilemmas. Any facts to add to this post hunter, or you will use insults again to hide your ignorance or your AWG belief? Since Im here you never add any factual consistence to this forum Why are you here? Trolling and insulting? goldbuster1, Do tell us more about Analemma and how it is controlled by the solar magnet. The next time you add a fact will be your first. Troll on. |
|
|
|
Post by goldbuster1 on May 12, 2010 3:10:05 GMT
This is not a post about facts but hypothesis, magnetism was embryonic when Newton came around with his Gravity laws. So exploring the effects of magnetism on rotation, gravitation and climate is long time overdue. Is the Earth ellipse around the Sun locked to the Sun equator or its following The Kozai Mechanism? www.orbitsimulator.com/gravity/articles/kozai.html Anything constructive you want to add to this Troll hunter? |
|
|
|
Post by hunter on May 12, 2010 4:33:28 GMT
goldbuster1,
What does Kozai have to do with magnetism?
Nothing.
If the Earth was in a Kozai polar orbit, we would never know it because we would be either fried or frozen.
None of it has to do with climate mechanisms that exist on Earth.
And it is obvious you just tossed the Analemma out as an idiotic gesture.
None of what you post is about facts, and your hypotheses are childish at best.
I do have one other question:
Do you practice at being a troll/jerk, or does it come naturally?
|
|
|
|
Post by goldbuster1 on May 12, 2010 4:53:15 GMT
Thats right hunter stick to CO2 bubbling out of antarctic ice core and pay your %500 hike heating bill feeling all flowery about it. 0.003% CO2 does affects climate more than the Earth magnetic field ? " Northwestern researchers took a different approach, looking at the variations in the planet's magnetic field. This is constantly fluctuating, with magnetism growing stronger or weaker in different places, and with the poles gradually shifting over time. They found that these variations correlated strongly with changes in ocean circulation. In the north Atlantic, for example, changes in the strength of currents were matched by sharp changes in magnetic fields. " www.tgdaily.com/general-sciences-features/42844-ocean-currents-may-control-earths-magnetic-fieldWhat about the Sun magnetic field of 100x more potent? does it affects earth ellipse? You cant even admit to gravity, you are a long way from magnetism |
|
|
|
Post by dogsbody on May 18, 2010 9:17:10 GMT
Thats right hunter stick to CO2 bubbling out of antarctic ice core and pay your %500 hike heating bill feeling all flowery about it. 0.003% CO2 does affects climate more than the Earth magnetic field ? " Northwestern researchers took a different approach, looking at the variations in the planet's magnetic field. This is constantly fluctuating, with magnetism growing stronger or weaker in different places, and with the poles gradually shifting over time. They found that these variations correlated strongly with changes in ocean circulation. In the north Atlantic, for example, changes in the strength of currents were matched by sharp changes in magnetic fields. " www.tgdaily.com/general-sciences-features/42844-ocean-currents-may-control-earths-magnetic-fieldWhat about the Sun magnetic field of 100x more potent? does it affects earth ellipse? You cant even admit to gravity, you are a long way from magnetism Don't worry about him Goldbuster, after all cynicism and ridicule are hardly a legitimate form of objective debate. And the hypothesis may well be worth discussing. Personally I like to investgate something before I dismiss it out of hand. |
|
|
|
Post by fischer on May 18, 2010 12:03:51 GMT
you should ask Dr. Svalgaard up on the solarcycle24 topic board. He knows quite a bit about the sun, and there is a thread to ask him such questions. He is most likely the only person here that is qualified to speak to this. I would be interested in his response. and since your question isn't technically about global warming, they may let it stand.  |
|
