Climate Change as a United Nations Stalking Horse?

[Pooh]

I once believed that "Anthropogenic Climate Change" (promoted by Post-Normal Science) was not a conspiracy. If the following news report and the background papers can be confirmed, I will have to rethink that conclusion.

Russell, George. “EXCLUSIVE: After a Year of Setbacks, U.N. Looks to Take Charge of World's Agenda.” Text.Article. FOXNews.com, September 8, 2010.
www.foxnews.com/world/2010/09/08/years-setbacks-looks-world-leader/

"After a year of humiliating setbacks, United Nations Secretary General Ban ki-Moon and about 60 of his top lieutenants­the top brass of the entire U.N. system ­spent their Labor Day weekend at a remote Austrian Alpine retreat, discussing ways to put their sprawling organization in charge of the world’s agenda.
"[H]ow to restore “climate change” as a top global priority after the fiasco of last year’s Copenhagen summit;
"[H]ow to continue to try to make global redistribution of wealth the real basis of that climate agenda, and widen the discussion further to encompass the idea of 'global public goods'

Background Papers: The Secretary-General's Retreat. Alpbach, Austria, September 5, 2010.
www.foxnews.com/projects/pdf/austria_retreat_papers.pdf

National sovereignty will have to go as well. That will save you the trouble of voting.

[poitsplace]

Its not a conspiracy proper...where they're actually pulling the strings, its just what their job is. They were gathered to push this agenda. Its the whole reason politicization of science is a bad idea. Any good scientist can have his position change on a dime. Show him reasonable evidence and he'll do an about face on his worldview. These politicians are simply trying to further their cause and...what the heck, there might even be a bit of personal gain in it for them and their parent organization.

THANKFULLY it appears that the bulk of humanity thinks they're wrong and most of the remainder are starting to notice that anything that suppresses the economy will be far worse than a degree or two of warming.

[socold]

"[H]ow to continue to try to make global redistribution of wealth the real basis of that climate agenda"

hmm

[poitsplace]

Its not generally stated as "redistribution of wealth" but that's exactly how it works out in the end. An imaginary "debt" for living the good life at the expense of the environment is paid to the developing nations because there's no way in hell they could ever afford the moronic "alternative" energy schemes being pushed if the developed nations can't afford it.

You know its funny. These naive neo-environmentalists are claiming we should create a system that's unique in that corruption can reach essentially 100%. Its entirely corruptable because its entirely artificial and involves payment for an imaginary debt. BUT these are generally the same people that complain about businesses sending money to the area for real-world goods like oil or diamonds...and even beefing up the local economy by establishing industry (and the required infrastructure).

[curiousgeorge]

I read the UN Position Papers. No matter how they dress it up with feel good rhetoric and references to future international agreements, it still amounts to global tyranny with the UN in charge of virtually everything of any importance.

[scpg02]

Sept 9, 2010 20:30:22 GMT curiousgeorge said:

I read the UN Position Papers. No matter how they dress it up with feel good rhetoric and references to future international agreements, it still amounts to global tyranny with the UN in charge of virtually everything of any importance.

Exactly! That's why we say it is a planned move to trigger global government. The NWO.