|
Post by glennkoks on Dec 4, 2012 2:03:47 GMT
astromet,
I have little faith in your forecasts and I personally think you are a quack. But I have been wrong before and have an open mind. So I will wait until 2017-2018 before issuing a public apology on these boards if you are correct.
|
|
|
Post by AstroMet on Dec 4, 2012 3:23:13 GMT
astromet, I have little faith in your forecasts and I personally think you are a quack. But I have been wrong before and have an open mind. So I will wait until 2017-2018 before issuing a public apology on these boards if you are correct. Anyone can be 'wrong' Glenn and I certainly have been before as I am human, but I am also professional forecaster so you have no right at all to call me (or anyone else for that matter) a 'quack,' since you have not shown the slightest knowledge of astronomic forecasting to be in any position to say such a thing. For one, 'quacks' do not forecast the climate and weather accurately. And two, examples of accurate long-range climate forecasts - such as my dry winter and extreme drought 2012 forecast on this very thread that you've commented on should be proof positive enough that you don't have to "wait until 2017-2018" to see my proficientcy as a forecaster. That is if you even bothered to read what I forecasted. So don't call me a 'quack' again if you want me to respect any of your further comments. I work very hard and publish my public long-range forecasts for free to help others and 'quacking' has nothing to do with my climate/weather forecasting thank you very much Glenn buddy boy. If you don't like what I forecast then simply don't read them and that solves your 'faith' and 'personal' problems right there and then now, doesn't it? You are not knowledgeable. The last time we encountered you Glenn you were still pushing around the fallacy of 'man-made global warming,' which proves that you do not have both oars in the water. There is no such thing as 'man-made global warming' as it violates the laws of physics that govern your own planet's climate. Only a 'quack' (as you use the term) would believe in 'man-made global warming.' You also do not forecast and obviously are clueless about long-range forecasting to even offer any informed opinion to the contrary. How can you be 'wrong' when all you offer are opinion? That dog doesn't hunt. This is forecasting science Glenn, not high school hijinks based on your personal sensibilities and opinions. Also, what you just wrote is not a sign of having an 'open mind' in the least, as I did not ask for your 'personal' thoughts anyway and will remind you that your personal thoughts, your 'faith' or your opinions have absolutely no bearing on the world's climate (either present or future) whatsoever. That's zero, meaning zilch and Nada. Nor do I require what you call your 'faith' to continue my forecasting. I forecast using applied variable mathematics. There is no 'quacking' involved. You ought to try it sometime rather than spewing out immature comments on a professional weather board. No one asked you for your opinion, or for your 'faith,' so for you to proffer it in such an manner as you just have is proof positive that you're simply acting out as a Neanderthal without a clue as to that on which you opine. Moreover, you don't have to wait until 2017-2018 to see if I am right about the official start of global cooling; as I have forecasted numerous climate & weather events (long in advance) that have happened and have been proven correct many times over. The only person who needs to 'issue a public apology' is you. 'Quack' on that and while you're at it, get real. Let's try sounding much more intelligent your next time round Glenn, shall we?
|
|
|
Post by AstroMet on Dec 4, 2012 3:44:07 GMT
Theo, New to this site and spent a lot of time reading your postings and predictions. Your percentage of accuracy is very impressive. Definitely interested in subscribing to your new service. Until that is available I want to say thanks for your effort in making your information public. We farm in the upper midwest (SE MN) and we were very fortunate to catch some timely rains that most of the corn belt missed. At this time do you have any thoughts as to South America's ability to raise a trend line yield? It sounds like the areas that were too wet are now drying out and the areas that were too dry are getting some much needed moisture to start their season. Maybe you already have this posted on another site? Mark I've been working on this Mark. From the looks of my calculations for 2013, South America's climate is in play. What is interesting also is that the yields were high enough for the U.S. to purchase corn from South America in light of the severe drought I forecasted to take place this year. The drought really has harmed the Corn Belt bringing about very tight supplies along with the higher prices. For instance, Smithfield Inc., the world's largest pork producer, announced last summer that they were going to import corn from Brazil. This showed how the drought I forecasted for 2012 raised costs for U.S. feed grain. It spread through the livestock and meat industry. I figure more producers have also bought Brazilian corn. Analysts said that it is unusual for U.S. livestock producers to import supplies from South America, though it could be cheaper to buy and ship corn from there to the eastern U.S. than to get it by rail from the Midwest, in light of the high domestic corn prices. The U.S. is by far the world's biggest producer and exporter of corn but nations like Japan reportedly continues to buy cheaper corn from South America and the Ukraine, so this has put another dent in U.S. market share. The extreme drought I forecasted for 2012 will continue into 201, according to my long-range calculations. It's going to be a tough go of it for another growing season I'm afraid. See -> www.reuters.com/article/2012/10/24/usa-corn-exports-idAFL1E8LOFLS20121024
|
|
|
Post by glennkoks on Dec 5, 2012 1:54:17 GMT
astromet,
It's not that I don't like your forecasts. I am indifferent. They just are not accurate enough to merit second thought. Vague generalizations that from what I have read are no better than chance.
Good luck with your endeavors. And we will see if you're forecast of global cooling starting in 2017 is correct.
|
|
|
Post by glennkoks on Dec 5, 2012 4:43:49 GMT
I am assuming that this is your website? globalastrologyblog.blogspot.com/2012/10/the-cardinal-crisis-jobs-global-economy.htmlYou seem to be a jack of all trades. GLOBAL ASTROLOGY * MUNDANE ASTROLOGER THEODORE WHITE FORECASTS ON WORLD EVENTS* 21ST CENTURY ASTROLOGY * FORECASTS ON WEATHER THAT'S OUTER & INNER PLANE... NEWS * ASTROPHYSICAL * GEOPHYSICAL * TRANSITS * CURRENT EVENTS * SIGNS * THE FUTURE * MUNDANE FORECASTS * ASTRONOMY * ASTROJOURNALISM * ECONOMICS * MYSTERIES * PROPHECY * NATAL ASTROLOGY * ASTROTHEOLOGY * GNOSIS * SCIENCE * WISDOM * AND PRACTICAL COMMONSENSE AS GLOBAL EVENTS APPLY TO THE WHOLE AND NOT SIMPLY TO THE SUM OF ITS OWN PARTS.
|
|
|
Post by glennkoks on Dec 5, 2012 4:46:23 GMT
Signs? The future? Mysteries?
And you have the nerve to claim I don't have both oars in the water?
|
|
|
Post by nonentropic on Dec 5, 2012 4:59:39 GMT
I agree Glennkoks.
|
|
|
Post by AstroMet on Dec 5, 2012 7:42:36 GMT
I am assuming that this is your website? globalastrologyblog.blogspot.com/2012/10/the-cardinal-crisis-jobs-global-economy.htmlYou seem to be a jack of all trades. GLOBAL ASTROLOGY * MUNDANE ASTROLOGER THEODORE WHITE FORECASTS ON WORLD EVENTS* 21ST CENTURY ASTROLOGY * FORECASTS ON WEATHER THAT'S OUTER & INNER PLANE... NEWS * ASTROPHYSICAL * GEOPHYSICAL * TRANSITS * CURRENT EVENTS * SIGNS * THE FUTURE * MUNDANE FORECASTS * ASTRONOMY * ASTROJOURNALISM * ECONOMICS * MYSTERIES * PROPHECY * NATAL ASTROLOGY * ASTROTHEOLOGY * GNOSIS * SCIENCE * WISDOM * AND PRACTICAL COMMONSENSE AS GLOBAL EVENTS APPLY TO THE WHOLE AND NOT SIMPLY TO THE SUM OF ITS OWN PARTS. Yes, my forecasting site has been up and running for years. I am a polymath (not a 'jack of all trades') for your information. Learn the difference. I also do not subscribe to your 'man-made global warming' pseudo-science junk Glenn, which you've consistently pushed on this board without so much as any proof whatsoever or a clue as to the realities of the law of physics that govern our world and that I apply to forecast in the real world.
|
|
|
Post by AstroMet on Dec 5, 2012 7:49:53 GMT
Signs? The future? Mysteries? And you have the nerve to claim I don't have both oars in the water? Yes, I will say it again to you Glenn - that you do not have both oars in the water. That doesn't take any 'nerve' to say to you, but thank you anyway. I am actually doing you a favor since you're the one that says that you've been wrong before; but you seem to not have learned your lessons Horatio. Let's try to be a big boy here Glenn, you know, a grown-up and not a narcissistic child who thinks he has learned all that there is in the world because by the very content of your own comments you have proven that you surely have not and you have MUCH to learn. Signs do exist in our world as do mysteries Glenn. Moreover, if you also claim that the 'future' does not exist, then you have proven my point that you just don't have all 52 cards in your deck and certainly not both oars in the water, yes I do have the 'nerve' to say that and just did - three times now - to you. I mean it too. Since you don't have any other argument except your silly attempts to mock, act out immaturely and to this point not showing any intelligence on that which you choose to speak, the next question is: why do you even presume to care? Yeah, it's all fluff and 'quackery' Glenn. There's nothing to see here in your 'personal' opinion ... 'signs' and 'mysteries' and the 'future'... those things just don't exist on Earth, at least not in Glenn's 'man-made global warming fantasy world.' Is that right? If anyone is a 'quack' it is you, not knowing that it is simply impossible for a perpetual machine (which we haven't seen to date) that must pump immensely huge amounts of heat into the Earth's upper atmosphere (which is cold by the way) using incredible amounts of power to be able to force and then trap heat causing a 'man-made greenhouse' which the laws of atmospheric physics and the Second Law of Thermodynamics says is impossible (meaning it cannot happen on Earth - ever.) You believe in 'man-made global warming yet you have the nerve to call me a 'quack?' So, yeah Glenn, in my assessment no, you do not have both your oars in the water. You're also commenting on my forecast thread (this particular one) where, if you noticed, I forecasted a extreme drought for 2012 before it happened. I walk my talk pal. What about you? I mean, aw shucks Glenn, you know, with you spouting on about your 'personal feelings' (who cares?) and you not having faith in my climate forecasts (who asked that from you to begin with?) and your uninformed opinions all aside: Where's the beef pal? But we all heard you loud and clear Glenn. It's all just nothing - at least you have an 'open mind - according to you, that is. Okay. You spoke your two cents (for whatever that's worth : Does the world have to stop turning for you, or can we go back to work forecasting in the real world now? I love it when some people who have troubles holding onto their own weak rhetoric decide to play out their internal struggles by projecting out, onto others, throwing their spaghetti logic at the wall; while they themselves silently question their own views. What has happened is that you got a late start Glenn and need to catch up. That's what this is about so please don't insult my intelligence thank you very much. And, the best way to learn, is to speak less, listen to learn more as you observe the world and universe around you. Why don't you read and learn from those who have mastered their crafts and ask good questions (with the open mind you say that you have) rather than to mock that which you obviously are ignorant of? I mean, I know it is far easier to be ignorant and take pot shots at matters where you are not versed; but it takes a man to admit that he has much more to learn in the world; so that perhaps one day, he too may be able to see clearly into the 'future' by means of hard work in the field of variable mathematics. (That means walking your talk in street credo Glenn.) In the wise words of Yoda - "You must unlearn what you have learned Glenn," and "Do, or do not - there is no try." May the Force Be With You.
|
|
|
Post by glennkoks on Dec 5, 2012 12:12:41 GMT
astromet,
unless you can use you're astrolabe, crystal ball or whatever other "scientific" methods you use to predict the future value of a stock or get somewhat more detailed in you're forecasts they are of no real use to the rest of us that live in the real world.
In the mean time you can go back to channeling Nostradamus or trying to change lead into gold or whatever else you do in you're spare time. I have wasted far too much of my time already on reading you're nonsense.
|
|
|
Post by AstroMet on Dec 5, 2012 20:08:52 GMT
astromet, unless you can use you're astrolabe, crystal ball or whatever other "scientific" methods you use to predict the future value of a stock or get somewhat more detailed in you're forecasts they are of no real use to the rest of us that live in the real world. In the mean time you can go back to channeling Nostradamus or trying to change lead into gold or whatever else you do in you're spare time. I have wasted far too much of my time already on reading you're nonsense. Yes, it appears you have 'wasted far too much' of your 'time' reading my 'nonsense' (by the way Glenn, the correct usage is "your," not the "you're" that you've used several times in your writing.) So 'channel' that. And you don't speak for the 'rest of us,' as there are plenty of people whom I help who use my forecasts in the real world. There's nothing 'vague' about anything. I say what I mean and mean what I say. It is a priori-based science that you obviously know very little about according to the content of your own comments. As for my tools, well, I've used an Astrolabe for many years kiddo, it's part of astronomic forecasting based on mathematical positions of the celestial bodies, including the one you supposedly reside on. I've never had or needed your so-called 'crystal ball,' as you say or 'channeled Nostradamus' or none of the other pop culture new age crap you foolishly believe. You're way off base there pal. Think variable mathematics next time and you'll get a lot closer to the truth of how I am able to forecast accurately in the real world. That's the problem with people like you. It's far easier to not think and work hard, however Glenn, facts do not cease to exist because you choose to ignore them. Always remember that. And, while you are at it - get yourself off the new agey AGW man-made global warming alarmist yada yada kool-aid you've been gulping down Glenn. It has seriously poisoned your mind. Get both oars in the water about the truth of the Earth's climate. Here's a tip for you: keenly observe Mother Nature, that's what I call the laws of physics. Lastly, I never asked you to read any 'nonsense' of mine in the first place. So you can go back to sleep now. That's your choice. No one can 'think' for you Glenn. In the final analysis, it's your mind kiddo and you know - a mind is a terrible thing to waste.
|
|
|
Post by glennkoks on Dec 6, 2012 0:25:19 GMT
astromet,
Go back to milking old ladies from their Social Security or whatever else you do for a living as a purveyor of mysteries and prophecies. Your so called "forecasts" just don't hold up.
|
|
|
Post by AstroMet on Dec 6, 2012 0:46:40 GMT
astromet, Go back to milking old ladies from their Social Security or whatever else you do for a living as a purveyor of mysteries and prophecies. Your so called "forecasts" just don't hold up. Grow up Glenn and quit drinking the kool-aid, that's your problem kiddo. Get a life troll. Jeez.
|
|
|
Post by glennkoks on Dec 6, 2012 1:05:16 GMT
I don't drink mysticism which is what you are pushing not science.
|
|
|
Post by sigurdur on Dec 6, 2012 1:06:47 GMT
Theodore: Can you define ENSO. From my knowledge, the Pacific is always in a state of ENSO.
There are roughly three states of ENSO: 1. La Nina 2. El Nino 3. La Nada.
When you post about an ENSO event, what are you referring to?
|
|