AMARGOSA VALLEY, Calif. — April Sall gazed out at the Mojave Desert flashing past the car window and unreeled a story of frustration and backroom dealings.
Her small California group, the Wildlands Conservancy, wanted to preserve 600,000 acres of the Mojave. The group raised $45 million, bought the land and deeded it to the federal government.
The conservancy intended that the land be protected forever. Instead, 12 years after accepting the largest land gift in American history, the federal government is on the verge of opening 50,000 acres of that bequest to solar development.
Even worse, in Sall's view, the nation's largest environmental organizations are scarcely voicing opposition. Their silence leaves the conservancy and a smattering of other small environmental organizations nearly alone in opposing energy development across 33,000 square miles of desert land.
"We got dragged into this because the big groups were standing on the sidelines and we were watching this big conservation legacy practically go under a bulldozer," said Sall, the organization's conservation director. "We said, 'We can't be silent anymore.' "
Similar stories can be heard across the desert Southwest. Small environmental groups are fighting utility-scale solar projects without the support of what they refer to as "Gang Green," the nation's big environmental players.
Local activists accuse the Sierra Club, the Natural Resources Defense Council, Defenders of Wildlife, the Wilderness Society and other venerable environmental groups of acquiescing to the industrialization of the desert because they believe large-scale solar power is essential to slowing climate change.
Janine Blaeloch, director of the Western Lands Project, a small public lands watchdog group, said Gang Green's members are compliant in order to make themselves more inviting to major foundations. In recent years, grants for projects focusing on climate change and energy have become the two top-funded issues in environmental philanthropy. Foundations have awarded tens of millions of dollars in grants to environmental groups that make renewable energy a top priority.
"It's not that they solely and directly make decisions based on funding, but they keep their eyes open to what foundations want," Blaeloch said.
As a result, "you've got enviros exactly where industry wanted them to be," she said.
Big environmental organizations say they have agonized over how to approach the issue. They acknowledge that development can have irreversible effects on ecosystems. But they are reluctant to stand in the way of renewable energy projects they regard as a vital response to climate change, which they consider the nation's most serious environmental challenge.
The Sierra Club, NRDC and Defenders of Wildlife filed suit last week to stop the troubled Calico solar project northeast of Los Angeles. But for the most part the big players have embraced solar development.
Instead of following the old adversarial formula of saying no to everything, they have adopted an approach they call, "Getting to yes."
'Green halo' effect
Grass-roots groups say that strategy has failed to protect the desert. What's worse, they say, is that the imprimatur of such groups as the Sierra Club has provided a '"green halo" to energy companies and the government — making it easy for them to ignore local environmental concerns.
Two major projects underway in the Mojave illustrate the divide between local and national groups.
Desert activists vigorously oppose the BrightSource Energy project in the east Mojave's Ivanpah Valley and NextEra's Genesis solar plant 20 miles west of Blythe. National groups have not mounted a strong challenge to either project.
When BrightSource was planning the Ivanpah installation, the big environmental players urged the firm to move the bulk of the project closer to Interstate 5 to avoid prime habitat for the desert tortoise, a protected species. The company responded by reducing its total footprint by 12%, which didn't solve the problem.
After construction began, large numbers of desert tortoises were discovered. According to federal biologists, BrightSource is now responsible for relocating and caring for 95% of all the tortoises expected to be found on all solar project sites in the Mojave.
Copyright © 2012, Los Angeles Times
1 2 3 next | single page
Comments 58Share490
MORE FROM THE TIMES
You might like:
Sheriff's captain took inmate on golf outing, deputy says | Los Angeles Times -- Local
So-called knock-knock burglars targeting affluent neighborhoods | Los Angeles Times -- Local
For the record | Los Angeles Times -- News
Future NASA mission to sun is 'a life's dream' for some | Los Angeles Times -- Science News
Drug lords targeted by Fast and Furious were FBI informants | Los Angeles Times -- National News
FROM AROUND THE WEB
Selected for you by our sponsor:
10 White Singers We Once Thought Were Black | MadameNoire
Warning! 7 Lies All Women Tell Men | MadeMan
Inside Islam: What a Billion Muslims Really Think | SnagFilms
Kissing Angelina Jolie Was 'Awkward, Sweaty, And Not Very Nice' | StyleBistro
6 legendary musicians who filed for bankruptcy | Bankrate.com
[what's this]
MORE FROM THE TIMES
1940 census records are a smash online hit
Mega Millions mystery widens as Maryland 'winner' comes forward
Cooking hard-boiled eggs, the right way
Keith Olbermann 'arrogant,' 'immature,' Current court filing says
Whitney Houston scalded by hot bathtub water, coroner finds
Ads by Google
Masters in SustainabilityNEC Online Master's Degree Program in Sustainable Development Studies MastersinSustainability.NEC.EduLower Your Energy BillSave 20% on your heat/AC bill The world’s 1st Learning Thermostat
www.nest.comComments (58)Add / View comments | Discussion FAQ
Orawczyk at 2:28 PM April 06, 2012
Distributed renewable energy in the form of rooftop photovoltaic (PV) panels and small scale backyard wind turbines is the better answer for a multitude of reasons, but the energy industry sees this as a threat to their profit monopoly and market share. So our politicians do their bidding and we get stuck with the bill, otherwise our politicians would subsidize and underwrite low interest government loans to real property owners to install distributed PV rather than to K-Road’s remote project proposal.
Orawczyk at 2:26 PM April 06, 2012
It is the mission of the Bureau of Land Management to sustain the health, diversity, and productivity of the public lands for the use and enjoyment of present and future generations. Yet it is a mistake to assume the BLM will “conserve” pristine lands purchased and subsequently donated to the U.S. Government under the care of the BLM by conservation groups because the BLM answers to politicians who do the bidding of their financial supporters, often over what is in the best interest of the public. The energy industry hires attorneys to draft public policy and then hires lobbyists to submit the drafts to our politicians who then introduce the draft into the legislative process, arguably in relation the financial support the politicians receive from the special interests behind the lobbyists and authors of the proposed public policy. Thus our system of governance is corrupted by the whims of avarice.
Sacrificing pristine public lands for the short term jobs and financial benefit of foreign investors while the taxpayer suffers the capital risk by underwriting these projects, which if successful will increase the consumers electric bill exponentially, serves the interest of the energy industry over that of the consumer, the taxpayer, and the public, to say nothing of the affected rare plants and endangered species
hueychief at 2:24 PM April 06, 2012
NatureLover2012 at 1:21 PM April 6, 2012
In order to save a decent future for our children, (not to mention wildlife in the deserts and mountains), we need to stop burning fossil fuels globally ASAP and replace them with renewable energy
You are wrong,there is NOTHING to replace fossil fuels for a long time.Oil can be and is safe.GREEN is the new RED!
Comments are filtered for language and registration is required. The Times makes no guarantee of comments' factual accuracy. Readers may report inappropriate comments by clicking the Report Abuse link next to a comment. Here are the full legal terms you agree to by using this comment form.
www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-solar-green-20120406,0,6552376.story