|
Post by glennkoks on Feb 27, 2013 19:37:26 GMT
Theodore, I don't doubt the influence of celestial events on our climate. Only on your ability to correctly forecast them. And it has been my experience in life that those who boast of being "professional" or a "master" of something usually are not. If you were truly a "professional" you would not need to boast.
Agriculture worldwide is a multi-billion dollar industry. Don't you think if there was the least bit of validity to you're nonsense big firms and Wall Street would be knocking down you're door and throwing money at you for the so called "forecasts" you publish? Then you could move out of you're parents basement and get an actual office to work out of.
In addition, I thought we agreed that this nasty back and forth was pointless? We both are fully aware of just what we think of one another. The only reason why I commented was my opinion was asked. I will now go back to ignoring you're nonsense and you can go back to trying to swindle the simple minded.
|
|
|
Post by AstroMet on Feb 27, 2013 20:06:56 GMT
Theodore, I don't doubt the influence of celestial events on our climate. Only on your ability to correctly forecast them. And it has been my experience in life that those who boast of being "professional" or a "master" of something usually are not. If you were truly a "professional" you would not need to boast. Agriculture worldwide is a multi-billion dollar industry. Don't you think if there was the least bit of validity to you're nonsense big firms and Wall Street would be knocking down you're door and throwing money at you for the so called "forecasts" you publish? Then you could move out of you're parents basement and get an actual office to work out of. In addition, I thought we agreed that this nasty back and forth was pointless? We both are fully aware of just what we think of one another. The only reason why I commented was my opinion was asked. I will now go back to ignoring you're nonsense and you can go back to trying to swindle the simple minded. You don't know me. I never met you and you know nothing about what you are talking about. I think the only 'simple-minded' person commenting here is you, to be frank. There are plenty of Wall Street investors and traders who consult with professional astrologers. I have many clients in diverse fields, including financial traders, investors, farmers, ranchers, AG commodities traders, etc. etc.,, whom I produce my forecast reports for. You know absolutely nothing about my business. And no, I don't live with my parents glennkoks. I am 50 years of age and have a home and an office of my own. There are plenty of people who don't hold with your negative tone, ignorance and presumption. If you want to be taken seriously, especially here, then you ought to get with becoming more knowledgeable than you actually are, or project yourself to be. In order for you to have an 'opinion,' then learn that you must first know about that on which you speak. Just because anyone asks you for your opinion glennkoks is not an invitation for you to give it if you are ignorant on that which you presume to speak. Simply pass up the opportunity to open your big mouth until you actually know what it is you are talking about. No one is boasting either. What your problem is that you want to boast about something you cannot do yourself. That is what a child does. Just how old are you Glenn? There are professionals on the pro board and I am one of them. If you want to understand how climate/weather works, then you are best to read much more than you opine. For how you comment has no other value other than for you to insult, be rude, sound stupid and play childish games with other members and guests who have to scroll past your posts. If you want to go back to playing with your X-Box then please play your games there. We are serious people and adults here on this board. Lastly, glennkoks, once again, it is 'your,' not you're in the ways you write in your posts. See another example above in your most recent comments. When are you going to learn to use proper grammar?
|
|
|
Post by glennkoks on Feb 27, 2013 20:58:58 GMT
Theodore, Good luck with your thriving business. I guess P.T. Barnum was correct when he said: "There is a sucker born every minute".
Im going back to ignoring your nonsense.
|
|
|
Post by AstroMet on Feb 27, 2013 21:38:16 GMT
Theodore, Good luck with your thriving business. I guess P.T. Barnum was correct when he said: "There is a sucker born every minute". Im going back to ignoring your nonsense. Luck is not a factor. Nor is your ignorance. And this isn't a circus, so neither is 'P.T. Barnum' (whatever that means.) My advice for you is to grow up, listen, learn and get smart. You're going to need those qualities to proceed as an adult in life. Start with improving your grammar Glenn. It is a sign of having some intelligence and common sense when communicating with others.
|
|
|
Post by AstroMet on Feb 27, 2013 22:10:03 GMT
Dear Astromet: Thanks for taking the time to reply. I will keep my questions brief and I hope polite. I have no desire to cause ill feelings. I am not a forecaster and the extent of my forecasting abilities are close to what is posted at the concierge desk at the Harrison Hot Spring Resort in BC. A small sign at the desk reads Today's Weather? Look Outside...with an arrow asking you to avert your gaze towards the window.... I believe natural events such as volcanic eruptions have had an effect on earths climate in the past and will again in the future. Should Yellowstone ever erupt the event would have global repercussions. Perhaps saying they have had an effect on the climate is incorrect, perhaps it should be said they have had an effect on the weather? I don't know. I do know the eruption of Krakatoa caused a period of global cooling as a layer of sulfur dioxide spewed into the atmosphere from the eruption reflected the suns' heat back into space. Do I believe humans are capable of changing the earth's climate by altering the atmosphere? Yes, from what I have read I believe we can alter the atmosphere and by reason the climate. Glennkoks: I'm interested to hear your thoughts. Please be polite to me, to Astro, to other readers even anonymous readers of the blog. But please share your thoughts. Codewhacker, Astrometeorology takes mind of seismic activity and volcanic eruptions and the effects on world climate. This particularly adds to cooling of the Earth, a new climate regime I've forecasted to begin in this decade. We are entering another healthy period of volcanic activity. For instance, in Peru, the 20,000-foot (6,000-meter) volcano, called Sabancaya, has recorded about 536 earthquakes of various magnitudes, that's about 20 an hour between February 22-23. The volcano is about 62 miles away from the city of Arequipa with a population of 1.2 million people. Some locals have started to leave because of the unusual seismic activity that has destroyed their homes. About 80 homes were reported damaged by one temblor on February 22. I've been monitoring the seismic activity and since mid-January the volcano has been releasing huge smoke trails. This current seismic activity is similar to that which of an eruption back in 1986.
|
|
|
Post by AstroMet on Feb 28, 2013 0:56:01 GMT
Codewhacker: I have read that the Yellowstone Caldera erupting would be like 1,000 Krakatoa eruptions. It would most likely cause what is called a climate shift. And it will not be pretty unless you like snow and ice. It might also cause a change in Length of Day (LOD) and if powerful enough could alter the Earth's orbit.... so yes people would notice. Well, despite the worst case scenarios, what has been long apparent throughout world history is that many of the empire changes came about not because of invasions, but rather because of natural climate change - and that climate change was global cooling. Global warming is always good for the earth and for populations. Anyone who claims otherwise does not have both oars in the water. However, global cooling has ended previous civilizations mainly because populations were not prepared for the cooler climate, which affects all aspects of daily life - and for decades. The combinations of drought, cooler temperatures and/or wetter and colder climes has always spelled disaster for agriculture. Without proper advance forecasts and preparation, it will happen again and it will not be a pretty sight. History has proven time and again that the idiots in society who claim otherwise - when the opposite is true - always scream the loudest just before climate disasters forecasted in advance arrive on time.
|
|
|
Post by sigurdur on Feb 28, 2013 1:39:49 GMT
Theodore: I am 100% in agreement with you concerning cold.
I have lost very little crop in my life because of warmth.
I have lost a LOT of crop because of cold.
|
|
|
Post by AstroMet on Feb 28, 2013 2:52:12 GMT
Theodore: I am 100% in agreement with you concerning cold. I have lost very little crop in my life because of warmth. I have lost a LOT of crop because of cold. The cold is the worst. For this year, the multi-year drought I've forecasted will continue into 2013. Going into 2013, even look at events at Yellowstone National Park which could experience wildfires this year. This drought has the capacity to be catastrophic for a host of reason in that it crosses the Corn Belt - the Upper Midwest States and North Plains States with suffering farmers and their crops and ranchers and their livestock. Drought conditions will spread along with heatwaves in 2013 and half of 2014 as normal precipitation will come back for some regions of North America. Dry conditions, according to my calculations will continue to seriously affect Iowa, SW Minnesota, Missouri, eastern Nebraska, Kansas and certain portions of Colorado. Further north of the American Plains, even Canadian farmland is affected like last year. One particular reason other than the over-tilling and corn-on-corn planting that makes things worse for soil conditions in a drought, I have warned farmers to avoid farming on land that's only marginally arable. Another problem is pumping groundwater near depletion marks. We are going to see another year of drought and heat waves so it is not over yet. It would be wise of farmers to prepare their operations well going into the 2013 growing season.
|
|
|
Post by sigurdur on Mar 1, 2013 1:57:19 GMT
Thanks Theodore.
|
|
|
Post by karlox on Mar 1, 2013 10:25:03 GMT
(It´s so catastrophic looking and expectations are being placed so low that any little improvement on this would be joiful: something to be thankful for) ;D
|
|
|
Post by AstroMet on Mar 1, 2013 19:27:55 GMT
Thanks Theodore: Thanks for the reply. Full disclosure: Our family has a farm and it is affected by weather. Question for you. You mention the drought this year will have ill consequences, and if greenhouse gases do exist, (do we both agree they do or they don't) and if they do encapsulate solar energy radiated from the sun (the affect) would this not cause a greenhouse effect and increase planetary temperatures? Hi Codewhacker, Well, this drought I forecasted is a multi-year drought, and in my Astromet calculations it will last to about 2015 in the last regions to be affected, but will subside midway through 2014. However, my general forecast for 2013's overall climate for the northern hemisphere is for record hot temperatures in June, July and August, as well as into early September in North America (like last year when I forecasted it) and the extension of the drought in the Plains, Midwest and parts of the deep South. It is all astronomically-forced. The positions of the Sun, Moon and planets regulate our climate. That's the way it has always been since the origin of our solar system and our Earth. These are the laws of solar, lunar and planetary motion. The laws of physics. Nothing has changed. As for greenhouse gases - Water Vapor constitutes the great majority of what are called 'greenhouse gases' in our atmosphere. Water vapor is the most powerful greenhouse gas. According to climate scientist Dr. Tim Ball, "Water vapor is the most important greenhouse gas. This is part of the difficulty with the public and the media in understanding that 95% of greenhouse gases are water vapor. The public understand it, in that if you get a fall evening or spring evening and the sky is clear the heat will escape and the temperature will drop and you get frost. If there is a cloud cover, the heat is trapped by water vapor as a greenhouse gas and the temperature stays quite warm. If you go to In Salah in southern Algeria, they recorded at one point a daytime or noon high of 52 degrees Celsius – by midnight that night it was -3.6 degree Celsius. That was caused because there is no, or very little, water vapor in the atmosphere and it is a demonstration of water vapor as the most important greenhouse gas.” And, according to the laws of physics, the Earth can never become a greenhouse since most of the radiation we receive from the Sun is emitted back into the cold of outer space. Our planet only takes in what it needs from the Sun to sustain life. There is no 'lid' over the Earth and never will be. That's how the laws of thermodynamics operate. Anyone who believes that the Earth can become a 'greenhouse' because of humanity, with C02 said to trap in heat with a glass lid over the entire skies of the planet Earth are in serious need of mental health therapy and then being schooled in the proper knowledge of how things work in the real world. That's my view. It is well known by those who can actually forecast that the Earth has never been, nor never shall become a 'greenhouse' - for that is impossible according to the laws of physics. Now, there are many people out there who have taken on wild nutty ideas, claiming pink elephants can fly and all that, but their incredible misconceptions and outrageous tales on the Earth's climate system is also proved by the fact that they cannot forecast the climate and weather. For if what they say is the truth, then they should easily be able to forecast seasonal weather - that's three months in advance. But they cannot and that speaks volumes as to the fear-mongering on the outright lie of 'man-made global warming' and all the lies, ideology and greed behind all of it. My advice is to not listen to a word of the 'man-made global warming' junk; for it is all BS. That dog simply does not hunt and that's a fact. For if they were right about 'man-made global warming,' - which is an impossibility on our planet - then of course they would then be able to forecast monthly, seasonal and yearly climate conditions and weather. But again - they cannot. That's proof positive that they do not know what governs Earth's climate and its resultant weather.
|
|
|
Post by sigurdur on Mar 1, 2013 20:13:40 GMT
"Now, there are many people out there who have taken on wild nutty ideas, claiming pink elephants can fly and all that"
Theodore:
Please be respectful in your analysis.
"An example is President Obama out there who have taken on wild nutty ideas, claiming pink elephants can fly and all that"
I corrected it for you.
|
|
|
Post by AstroMet on Mar 1, 2013 20:57:38 GMT
"Now, there are many people out there who have taken on wild nutty ideas, claiming pink elephants can fly and all that" Theodore: Please be respectful in your analysis. "An example is President Obama out there who have taken on wild nutty ideas, claiming pink elephants can fly and all that" I corrected it for you. Well, it really doesn't matter. People have politized something that is impossible for the Earth to become - and that's a greenhouse. Meanwhile, as that has been going on - with all the careerism, lies, waste, ideology and contention - what is coming is something far worse than warming - and that is global cooling. So, I don't go for anyone speaking on climate matters who haven't got all 52 cards in their deck on this one. Climate changes to global cooling is serious business - so all the huckstering aside, it really isn't very funny at all. Those who speak on the climate should at least know what it is that they are talking about, or should simply stay silent until they do know. The two-decade long so-called 'debate' and 'wars' on 'man-made global warming' hasn't raised anyone's IQ or knowledge of the true climate realities. And facts do not cease to exist because one chooses to ignore them.
|
|
|
Post by AstroMet on Mar 5, 2013 3:36:13 GMT
(It´s so catastrophic looking and expectations are being placed so low that any little improvement on this would be joiful: something to be thankful for) ;D We can hope for more in this new astrological year coming up on March 20th. Theodore White, Astrometeorologist.Sci
|
|
|
Post by AstroMet on Mar 5, 2013 23:19:49 GMT
|
|