|
Post by Andrew on Sept 17, 2013 19:39:36 GMT
Andrew, how about getting into a habit of writing c-big_fat_o-2 instead of c-poor_slim_zero-2? I think you said you were a chemist by trade? Or was that a freakochemist? CÖ2 C02 CO2 Strangely the characters i type do not appear the same when viewed outside of the editor. In the editor CO2 appears exactly as C zero 2 appears outside of the editor. 007 was pronounced double oh 7. Zeros in telephone numbers are often pronounced oh So i think C oh 2 and put C zero 2. The zero does not show the central dot outside the editor so it appears correct to me
|
|
|
Post by numerouno on Sept 18, 2013 3:44:06 GMT
Andrew, you better see an optician or an eye doctor.
Working in the editor, if I press the 0 key (located above the O key on my keyboard) I'll get a zero, if I press the O key with the shift key, I'll get the capital O.
|
|
|
Post by Andrew on Sept 18, 2013 4:05:57 GMT
Andrew, you better see an optician or an eye doctor. Working in the editor, if I press the 0 key (located above the O key on my keyboard) I'll get a zero, if I press the O key with the shift key, I'll get the capital O. I only see the dot inside the zero inside the editor. Inside the editor the shape of the zero is the same as the 'oh'
|
|
|
Post by numerouno on Sept 18, 2013 4:56:27 GMT
I only see the dot inside the zero inside the editor. Inside the editor the shape of the zero is the same as the 'oh'
I see no dot identifiers inside zeroes ever, and the dot inside would then have shown it's a zero even if the shape is slim? I can't even think of any standard Windows font that would have the dot inside the zero. You must have a weird browser or browser settings. In any case, if you press the o key you will get an o. Myself and I always check the actual posting.
|
|
|
Post by Andrew on Sept 18, 2013 5:49:57 GMT
I only see the dot inside the zero inside the editor. Inside the editor the shape of the zero is the same as the 'oh' I see no dot identifiers inside zeroes ever, and the dot inside would then have shown it's a zero even if the shape is slim? I can't even think of any standard Windows font that would have the dot inside the zero. You must have a weird browser or browser settings. In any case, if you press the o key you will get an o. Myself and I always check the actual posting. Instead of focusing on my incorrect freakophysics use of C02, you should be asking yourself where the latent heat of condensation goes to in your freakophysics dehumidifier, where so far you have only produced incoherent explanations, and have not shown you have clearly thought about what you are proposing.
|
|
|
Post by numerouno on Sept 18, 2013 5:59:43 GMT
Instead of focusing on my incorrect freakophysics use of C02, you should be asking yourself where the latent heat of condensation goes to in your freakophysics dehumidifier,
Andrew, it's CO2, not C02!
If you can't tolerate being corrected even on small and obvious points, why should I even try discussing anything with you? You are best left alone.
|
|
|
Post by Andrew on Sept 18, 2013 6:01:17 GMT
Instead of focusing on my incorrect freakophysics use of C02, you should be asking yourself where the latent heat of condensation goes to in your freakophysics dehumidifier,Andrew, it's CO2, not C02! If you can't tolerate being corrected even on small and obvious points, why should I even try discussing anything with you? You are best left alone. What aspect of 'my incorrect freakophysics use of C02' is beyond your ability to understand? Or do you wish to focus on my previous errors while avoiding correcting your current errors? Instead of focusing on my incorrect freakophysics use of C02, you should be asking yourself where the latent heat of condensation goes to in your freakophysics dehumidifier By the way I rather like your freakophysics descriptor. Particularly for this board which sees volumes of freakophysics drivel produced. Also with Nonentropic you chose to focus on minor habits he has, rather than deal with the substance of his posts attempting to get you to focus on your freakophysics dehumidifier drivel You also spent months arguing that icebreakers do not have to be enormously strong to withstand the huge horizontal crushing forces they experience during ramming/charging, and spent months talking drivel about baltic sea ice ridges. At no point have you ever demonstrated you can be corrected.
|
|
|
Post by numerouno on Sept 18, 2013 9:13:08 GMT
At least I can write the names of important molecules right, most of the time.
If you want to expant on your dehumidifier story, I advise your produce some practical published info on their alleged use as practical heating devices. I'm pretty much tired of your stream of consciousness. I understand you have not the best of mental healths, but I'm not a practicing or paid health professional either.
|
|
|
Post by Andrew on Sept 18, 2013 9:31:13 GMT
At least I can write the names of important molecules right, most of the time. If you want to expant on your dehumidifier story, I advise your produce some practical published info on their alleged use as practical heating devices. I'm pretty much tired of your stream of consciousness. I understand you have not the best of mental healths, but I'm not a practicing or paid health professional either. By the end of my first reply to you, I had already agreed admitted conceded accepted that i was not realising i was typing CO2 incorrectly After further harassment from you, I have already said it was incorrect and freakophysical to type C02 After even more harassment from you i have already taken the trouble to emphasise my use of an 'incorrect freakophysical' term - just in case you were unable to realise or read what i had said. By the end of that even a half wit should have been able to realise I now realised I had been typing CO2 incorrectly. And yet still you keep up the harrassment. What actually is your medical problem?? Adopting your usual abusive manner to protect your earlier delusions about freakophysical dehumidifiers where plainly you are now agreeing that they can produce more heat than the devices use in electricity is describing you. Please, if you are able to, stop being so infantile.
|
|
|
Post by numerouno on Sept 18, 2013 12:35:12 GMT
Andrew, perhaps try conctacting the dehumidifier manufacturers and tell them they can use the "get your free heating source" point in their sales literature and promotion. I know you have the talent in contacting people. You could even earn some money on the side.
You know I'm a half-wit already, so you are free to skip me.
|
|
|
Post by Andrew on Sept 18, 2013 12:41:02 GMT
Andrew, perhaps try conctacting the dehumidifier manufacturers and tell them they can use the "get your free heating source" point in their sales literature and promotion. I know you have the talent in contacting people. You could even earn some money on the side. You know I'm a half-wit already, so you are free to skip me. There is no free or magic heating source. Water has to be heated to be evaporated. For example from boiling your vegetables or having a hot bath. Then there is the almighty power of the Sun talk of free energy is infantile.
|
|
|
Post by numerouno on Sept 18, 2013 13:52:44 GMT
OK, you cuts a hole in the wall, and let's see the air flow. At least you would then be needing all that free energy, a win-win! Although you have started a thread called "Dehumidifiers warm a humid room more than power used".( solarcycle24com.proboards.com/thread/2142/dehumidifiers-warm-humid-room-power ) there should be a silent understanding that the "more" is strictly speaking not free. Some restrictions do apply.
|
|
|
Post by Andrew on Sept 18, 2013 15:07:16 GMT
OK, you cuts a hole in the wall, and let's see the air flow. At least you would then be needing all that free energy, a win-win! Although you have started a thread called "Dehumidifiers warm a humid room more than power used".( solarcycle24com.proboards.com/thread/2142/dehumidifiers-warm-humid-room-power ) there should be a silent understanding that the "more" is strictly speaking not free. Some restrictions do apply. What are you talking about now? As far as I know nobody other than you has been talking about free energy on this forum using dehumidifiers. If you plug in a dehumidifier consuming 200W of electricity and it extracts one gramme of water per minute then there will be additional sensible heat in the room, over the 200W supplied by the power consumed by the dehumidifier, to balance the removal of the latent heat. Either you believe in the laws of physics or you believe in freakophysics
|
|
|
Post by flearider on Sept 19, 2013 10:38:47 GMT
|
|
|
Post by trbixler on Sept 19, 2013 12:47:44 GMT
Something with the sun? Well not to worry as AGW will save us from the sun. The power of CO2 and taxes. "Solar activity drops to 100-year low, puzzling scientists" "LONDON: Predictions that 2013 would see an upsurge in solar activity and geomagnetic storms disrupting power grids and communications systems have proved to be a false alarm. Instead, the current peak in the solar cycle is the weakest for a century." "So if a new Maunder Minimum is on the way, which the forecasters insist it is not, it is likely to catch us by surprise. Given how little is known variations in solar activity, it would be foolish to rely on a Maunder Minimum to offset the rise in global temperatures due to greenhouse emissions." link
|
|