|
Post by fredzl4dh on Jun 27, 2015 10:18:10 GMT
Interesting paper: www.whyitsnotco2.com/Planetary_Core_and_Surface_Temperatures.pdfAbstract: When Maxwell and Boltzmann dismissed Loschmidt's postulate of a gravity gradient they did the world a great disservice, and they contributed to a belief in a non-existent warming by an imaginary radiative greenhouse effect. The subsequent “calls to authority” should be a lesson for all in the scientific world, for this has resulted in an absolute travesty of physics. The greenhouse conjecture will inevitably take its brief place in history as the biggest and most costly mistake ever in the field of human scientific endeavour. Hopefully that will be soon. Scientists, be they climatologists, physicists or whatever, need to step outside the square and to adopt a paradigm shift based on, and supported by 21 st century science. Dr Hans Jelbring and Roderich Graeff have each made significant contributions which must now be heeded before the mistake is perpetuated by those who now have personal vested interests in maintaining the status quo. Climate has in fact been following natural cycles [28] as shown in the Appendix to the author's paper on Radiated Energy [1] and the world can expect a period of about 500 years of cooling to start within 50 to 200 years from now
|
|
|
Post by nautonnier on Jun 27, 2015 16:50:45 GMT
I would have thought that the application of Avogadro's Hypothesis, Charles' Law and the Kinetic Theory of gasses would be all you need to show why there is a adiabatic lapse rate in atmospheric temperature. There is no need for a 'green house effect'.
|
|
|
Post by Andrew on Jun 28, 2015 6:09:08 GMT
I would have thought that the application of Avogadro's Hypothesis, Charles' Law and the Kinetic Theory of gasses would be all you need to show why there is a adiabatic lapse rate in atmospheric temperature. There is no need for a 'green house effect'. English please. Do you agree or not with the paper? I got involved with the Australian Doug Cotton on Tallblokes. Tallbloke allowed Cotton to present a paper there in 2012 on the basis he had some misgivings about the paper but 'we are all learning about radiation'. tallbloke.wordpress.com/2012/03/13/doug-cotton-radiated-energy-and-the-second-law-of-thermodynamics/Cotton 'invents' facts and refuses to correct them once the fairly obvious errors are pointed out to him. Really hard to believe he has a degree in physics - I found it impossible to get him to engage with the points that were put to him so that his thinking was modified by the information shown to him.
|
|