|
Post by nautonnier on Sept 30, 2019 14:35:05 GMT
I listened to Rudy Giuliani and Devin Nunes over the weekend and the Federlist misses a huge elephant in the room. The conversation with the Ukraine had other things in it. I think that there are multiple investigations in Ukraine (where the Podesta's worked as well as Manafort) that may prove really "embarrassing" perhaps criminally so not only to the Democrats but also to some of the 3 letter agencies (TLAs). Then surprise - the rules are changed for 'whistle blower' in the TLAs a week after the call and 2 weeks after the call a very lawyer worded hearsay 'whistle blower' report is sent to the IG for the TLAs. And of course this is just a week or so ahead of the department of justice IG report into the FBI and DOJ and the misuse of the FISA court. Methinks a flat stone has been lifted and the scuttling about under it has led to the attempt at impeachment as a smokescreen. Retiring to refit tin foil hat
|
|
|
Post by nautonnier on Sept 30, 2019 16:39:21 GMT
Sorry if this is tedious but if Trump does not survive we will be ruled by 'little Greta's
|
|
|
Post by nautonnier on Oct 1, 2019 12:04:32 GMT
I find it convenient that the Whistle-blower act was quietly changed just this last month. It used to require an individual have 1st hand knowledge, but last monthly it was quietly changed to allow 2nd and 3rd hand knowledge. Interesting. It looks like Trump getting clearance for the AG Barr investigation to talk to intelligence services in the '5I's' international intelligence sharing countries about the origin of the 'Mueller probe', has panicked the CIA who are as full of Comeys, McCabes and Strzoks as the FBI. Hence the reason the 'whistleblower' that has the democrats so excited appears to be a law firm not an individual. Here is the reason for the 'impeachment' "PRISON IS COMING: US Attorney Durham ‘Very Dialed In” on Obama FISA Court Scandal – Will Handle Prosecution of Any Criminal Action
Multiple sources familiar with US Attorney John Durham’s investigation on the origins of the Russia collusion probe say he is very dialed in. Any criminal actions uncovered in the investigation will be handled by Durham. According to DOJ sources, US Attorney John Durham is examining documents generated by an inter-agency “fusion cell” that former CIA Chief John Brennan set up in mid 2016.
Attorney General Barr appointed special prosecutor John Durham to investigate the origins of Spygate and it was recently revealed the probe is much broader than previously known.
Barr and Durham are working closely with CIA Director Gina Haspel, Director of National Intelligence, Dan Coats and FBI Director Christopher Wray on surveillance issues related to Trump’s 2016 campaign.
This suggests a broader inter-agency effort is underway which is why former CIA Director John Brennan, whose fingerprints are all over Spygate, is lashing out at Trump and Barr on Twitter and in media appearances."(My highlight) www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/06/prison-is-coming-us-attorney-durham-very-dialed-in-on-obama-fisa-court-scandal-will-handle-prosecution-of-any-criminal-action/
|
|
|
Post by nautonnier on Oct 1, 2019 13:03:34 GMT
|
|
|
Post by nautonnier on Oct 1, 2019 18:22:20 GMT
Curiouser and Curiouser .... "When Did Pelosi Knew About the Content of Trump’s Call with Ukraine’s Prez?
“He told me it was perfect, that there was nothing on the call,” Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) said on CBS News’ “60 Minutes,” referring to a conversation she had with President Trump before the Trump administration released the transcript.
“But I know what was in the call,” Pelosi continued, before quickly adding, “I mean, uh, it was in the public domain.”
Did she misspoke? Or did Pelosi just revealed an interesting detail, that she and most probably other high level democrats knew about the content of the President’s call with Ukraine’s President before last week." More at:: saraacarter.com/when-did-pelosi-knew-about-the-content-of-trumps-call-with-ukraines-prez/
|
|
|
Post by Ratty on Oct 5, 2019 13:24:55 GMT
As time goes by, I'm getting a clearer understanding of The Swamp:
|
|
|
Post by nautonnier on Oct 5, 2019 15:08:11 GMT
As time goes by, I'm getting a clearer understanding of The Swamp: When Tony Blair became prime minister one of his longer term projects was the politicization of the Civil Service. Obama was the same but took things a lot further replacing generals, three letter agency senior managers and department heads as well as the civil service. This is the Communitarianism handbook - it is being continued in both countries by a 'Common Purpose' supposed training group. The result is that there is an informal Führerprinzip everyone doing what 'the leader' wants them to do. After the election the old Führerprinzip still continues so a different leader finds he is being blocked all the time as what is being asked is not in line with Führerprinzip of the previous leader. Loyalty is to the Swamp not to the president. What is more, the RINOs are also loyal to the Swamp. In other countries this problem is solved by everyone above the level of office manager is _required_ to resign on election of a new leader. So in military terms anyone lieutenant colonel and above. The incoming administration then decides which resignations to accept. This avoids the Swamp buildup that we have seen in the US and UK. Term limits would also greatly assist; politics shouldn't be seen as a career.
|
|
|
Post by nautonnier on Oct 12, 2019 15:46:36 GMT
I have only had to break this kind of news a few times when I was in the military - it is hard.
Two minds though as that is what you joined to do with a known risk. But for those that put you at risk the responsibility is great, and unfortunately, many both civilian and military, do not rise to that responsibility.
|
|
|
Post by nautonnier on Oct 13, 2019 16:40:37 GMT
Just in case you haven't seen St Joe B in this video.....
|
|
|
Post by Ratty on Oct 14, 2019 12:49:01 GMT
Just in case you haven't seen St Joe B in this video..... Does that rate raised eyebrows and a WOW?
|
|
|
Post by nautonnier on Oct 14, 2019 17:36:45 GMT
Just in case you haven't seen St Joe B in this video..... Does that rate raised eyebrows and a WOW? Democrats, which of course include the all media, cannot see *anything* wrong in that good ol'Joe being Joe.....
|
|
|
Post by icefisher on Oct 15, 2019 4:49:49 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Ratty on Oct 15, 2019 22:37:03 GMT
Trump's 'China Muse' Has an Imaginary FriendIn that case, Navarro could well be the only economist worth listening to. Is that even a thing? Apologies to any economists on board and to any professors of clinical entrepreneurship.
|
|
|
Post by glennkoks on Oct 16, 2019 0:10:20 GMT
I think not only can Trump survive but he can flourish.
He just needs to be more Reaganish and less Childish...
While his economic policy, position on defense and trade is nearly identical. The way he speaks to public via Twitter is embarrassing. My wife a very moderate non political independent voted for him in 2016. I think she has regretted this ever since. I think much of America feels the same way.
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Oct 16, 2019 1:17:46 GMT
Trump's 'China Muse' Has an Imaginary FriendIn that case, Navarro could well be the only economist worth listening to. Is that even a thing? Apologies to any economists on board and to any professors of clinical entrepreneurship. Economists and climate scientists. They all have a plethora of imaginary friends ... clinical and otherwise.
|
|