|
|
Post by sentient on Dec 10, 2009 2:18:42 GMT
I can't find it this evening, but last night I broke a brainwind and added an "e" to:
algorithm
and got:
algoreithm
So now I am looking at having a bit of fun defining this new multidiscipline bit of mathematical subterfuge and am looking for volunteers to share in the profits when we patent this new miracle of political science.
I am thinking we need to code up this finely tuned algoreithm to incorporate the unknown but nevertheless eminently quantifiable political math (infinitely complex simultaneous quadratic equations), with "fudge factors" and "synthetics" (we may need to figure out how to hide those....)
So, first, we need a wonderfully complex, editable (something perhaps the Word equation thingy can understand) mathematical expression as a starting point, so that political, scientologic, aspirational, fraudulent and "smelly" data can easily accommodate.
Anybody have something like that stashed away? In the new mathemannics it probably doesn't matter what purpose it once had. We will simply hide any declines.
Just think, wouldn't it be nice to create it this week and float it around the web during Carbonhaven?
Who knows, if we do a slick enough job, maybe we could patent it and go after some of those trillions being bandied about with patent infringement suits! "They used our algoreithm and all we ask is a license and fair royalties....." Cap and trade baby!
So help me out here guys, might as well have some fun.
|
|
|
|
Post by sigurdur on Dec 10, 2009 2:27:05 GMT
I been cold all day, I been tired all evening. I am too tired to algoreithm. I am sure my comment would be riddled.....wtih errors...math equatins that are plausible albiet deniable.
And.....how would I haid the fact that my tin cup is out as my lectric bill is too high.
|
|
|
|
Post by sigurdur on Dec 10, 2009 2:29:20 GMT
As Al would say:
"I will just threw anather lawg on tat faire. Another tree ring fo heat"
|
|
|
|
Post by sentient on Dec 10, 2009 2:32:34 GMT
Come on sigurder, get with the "program" man!
|
|
|
|
Post by sentient on Dec 10, 2009 3:11:14 GMT
Working on the frontispiece for the patent application, I offer the following definition of ALGOREITHMS:
The ALGOREITHM
The ALGOREITHM represents a revolutionary leap forward in the calculus of polemics. Prior to the invention of the ALGOREITHM, subterfuge and skullduggery were often found to be fraudulent and socially unnaceptable as a result (we cite recent rulings in SEC vs. Madoff, US DOL vs. Enron etc.). By application of an entirely new branch of mathematics, for which a separate patent application has been filed, the simultaneous invention of MATHEMANNICS, afforded a unique and previously unknown means of quantitatively integrating indeterminate quantities, ambiguous social constants, tunneling low energy IQ neurons, lost data and single variable processing with the constants of misprision and fraud that when mathemannicly factored results in a complete and natural replacement for rational thought.
The ALGOREITHM.
|
|
|
|
Post by magellan on Dec 10, 2009 3:35:53 GMT
Working on the frontispiece for the patent application, I offer the following definition of ALGOREITHMS: The ALGOREITHM The ALGOREITHM represents a revolutionary leap forward in the calculus of polemics. Prior to the invention of the ALGOREITHM, subterfuge and skullduggery were often found to be fraudulent and socially unnaceptable as a result (we cite recent rulings in SEC vs. Madoff, US DOL vs. Enron etc.). By application of an entirely new branch of mathematics, for which a separate patent application has been filed, the simultaneous invention of MATHEMANNICS, afforded a unique and previously unknown means of quantitatively integrating indeterminate quantities, ambiguous social constants, tunneling low energy IQ neurons, lost data and single variable processing with the constants of misprision and fraud that when mathemannicly factored results in a complete and natural replacement for rational thought. The ALGOREITHM. #1 rule: When telling a lie, repeat it often. |
|
|
|
Post by nautonnier on Dec 10, 2009 3:49:24 GMT
I would think that the Algoreithm would take desired output as one of its inputs and would then apply 'correction adjustments' to whatever data is input to achieve the desired output. It would then delete all input data and only save the 'corrected and adjusted' data.
Ideally it should be written in something like crunched C++ with PL1, common LISP and FORTRAN G extensions. It should have overloaded variables, multiple structures and procedures that may or may not be called, random commenting out of lines of code with no documentation, or version control but a few misleading inline comments.
Does that sound right?
|
|
|
|
Post by sentient on Dec 10, 2009 4:29:36 GMT
I think you're on to something here. But don't tell Steve and Socold, they can be loose canyons, but nevertheless could prove useful as error handling rootines.
But we lack a robust, synthetic equation to manipulate.
Anybody have something, anything?
|
|
|
|
Post by sentient on Dec 10, 2009 4:35:02 GMT
P.S. Be sure to advise [redacted text], [redacted text] and [redacted text] to delete all messages that might be subject to greedom of information facts.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ratty on Dec 10, 2009 4:50:59 GMT
I think you're on to something here. But don't tell Steve and Socold, they can be loose canyons, but nevertheless could prove useful as error handling rootines. But we lack a robust, synthetic equation to manipulate. Anybody have something, anything? Loose canyons? A typo or on purpose? |
|
|
|
Post by spaceman on Dec 10, 2009 5:00:50 GMT
It will have to be tied to making money at someone else's expense. Rule #2: See rule 1.
The co2 algoreithm will be hard to beat.
|
|
|
|
Post by sentient on Dec 10, 2009 5:27:39 GMT
ratty: it was on porpoise
spaceman: better buy in now! Using the nautonnier pretzel forcing loop, the answer will always be going up!
|
|
|
|
Post by Ratty on Dec 10, 2009 9:35:30 GMT
ratty: it was on porpoise [Snip] Sounds fishy to me! |
|
|
|
Post by sigurdur on Dec 10, 2009 13:02:27 GMT
ratty: it was on porpoise [Snip] Sounds fishy to me! On a scale of 1 to 10....the algorithem must be finely layered. Flawless in movement in h20. When breaking surface, it must be able to withstand the barb of criticism and always tow the line. |
|
|
|
Post by Belushi TD on Dec 10, 2009 20:37:21 GMT
Here's a robust equation.... Mind you, since the Algoreithm has already been applied, it might be a bit difficult for the layman to understand...
1 + 1 = 3
However, I'm not going to publish my Algoreithm, nor my mathamanntics. Its MY intellectual property, dammit, and I'm not letting any of you warmers try to make money off my work!
Belushi TD
|
|
