|
Post by scpg02 on Dec 7, 2014 14:51:34 GMT
Harvard Law Professor: EPA Climate Rule Is Unconstitutional12:57 PM 12/05/2014 Michael Bastasch Contributor The Environmental Protection Agency’s proposed rule to cut carbon dioxide emissions from power plants is unconstitutional because it violates the Tenth Amendment and the Fifth Amendment, according to a noted liberal Harvard law professor. “In short, coal has been a bedrock component of our economy and energy policy for decades,” writes constitutional law professor Laurence Tribe. “The [EPA's rule] demonstrates the risk of allowing an unaccountable administrative agency to ‘make’ law and attempt to impose the burden of global climate change on an unlucky and unfortunate few.” “EPA’s singling out of a mere handful of emitters and limiting (or curtailing) their property is exactly the type of overreaching the Fifth Amendment seeks to prevent,” Tribe, who is on retainer for the coal company Peabody Energy, wrote in his comments to the EPA. Tribe’s argument that the EPA rule is unconstitutional is one of the strongest charges made against the agency’s Clean Power Plan to date. ~snip~ dailycaller.com/2014/12/05/harvard-law-professor-epa-climate-rule-is-unconstitutional/
|
|
|
Post by nautonnier on Dec 7, 2014 16:14:39 GMT
And of all the amendments to the constitution the one that the progressives never try to denigrate is the 5th Amendment - as they use it continually.
|
|