|
Post by nautonnier on Mar 29, 2020 16:34:03 GMT
|
|
|
Post by sigurdur on Mar 29, 2020 18:48:36 GMT
That should have been Dr. Mickey Mouse
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Mar 29, 2020 20:08:37 GMT
The few psychologists in the list might be most appropriate to what they are trying to accomplish. Psychologist definition is - a person who specializes in the study of mind and behavior or in the treatment of mental, emotional, and behavioral disorders : a specialist in psychology. Nephrologists might also be appropriate given CO2's piss poor relationship to climate.
|
|
|
Post by nautonnier on Jun 27, 2020 10:52:48 GMT
"Davos: the birthplace of a New World Government? But who are the parents?
In June 2019 the WEF signed an exclusive partnership agreement with the United Nations to accelerate the implementation of the UN’s 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development which has been adopted by all 193 UN member countries.
This strategic partnership caused great consternation in many quarters. The Transnational Institute (TNI), a think-tank with its roots in the anti-Vietnam movement, denounced it for “formalising the corporate capture of the UN and moving towards an increasingly privatised and less democratic global governance.” 400 organisations subsequently signed a letter calling for the termination of the UN/WEF’s agreement.
Far from being inhibited from continuing to develop policy – or using its influence and the resources of its powerful, global corporate membership to persuade or compel national Governments to adopt it’s ideals – the WEF states “now is the time to press the reset button on capitalism”. In essence it is calling for the dismantling of the entire global economic system in order that it can be re-cast to a design complying with its own agenda."tallbloke.wordpress.com/2020/06/27/davos-the-birthplace-of-a-new-world-government-but-who-are-the-parents/One would almost think it was planned as COP21 didn't work.
|
|
|
Post by gridley on Jun 27, 2020 16:08:04 GMT
"Davos: the birthplace of a New World Government? But who are the parents?
In June 2019 the WEF signed an exclusive partnership agreement with the United Nations to accelerate the implementation of the UN’s 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development which has been adopted by all 193 UN member countries.
This strategic partnership caused great consternation in many quarters. The Transnational Institute (TNI), a think-tank with its roots in the anti-Vietnam movement, denounced it for “formalising the corporate capture of the UN and moving towards an increasingly privatised and less democratic global governance.” 400 organisations subsequently signed a letter calling for the termination of the UN/WEF’s agreement.
Far from being inhibited from continuing to develop policy – or using its influence and the resources of its powerful, global corporate membership to persuade or compel national Governments to adopt it’s ideals – the WEF states “now is the time to press the reset button on capitalism”. In essence it is calling for the dismantling of the entire global economic system in order that it can be re-cast to a design complying with its own agenda."tallbloke.wordpress.com/2020/06/27/davos-the-birthplace-of-a-new-world-government-but-who-are-the-parents/One would almost think it was planned as COP21 didn't work. Kinda rich complaining about a "less democratic global governance" when talking about the UN supposedly getting weaker. How many kleptocrats and dictators have votes in that body? For that matter, how were the permanent members of the security council picked?
|
|
|
Post by Ratty on Jun 28, 2020 4:47:23 GMT
[ Snip ] Kinda rich complaining about a "less democratic global governance" when talking about the UN supposedly getting weaker. How many kleptocrats and dictators have votes in that body? For that matter, how were the permanent members of the security council picked? A former national Greens leader, Bob Brown, was an advocate for world government, "one person, one vote" ... Should we all move to India or ... China?
|
|
|
Post by nautonnier on Jun 28, 2020 9:23:09 GMT
"Davos: the birthplace of a New World Government? But who are the parents?
In June 2019 the WEF signed an exclusive partnership agreement with the United Nations to accelerate the implementation of the UN’s 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development which has been adopted by all 193 UN member countries.
This strategic partnership caused great consternation in many quarters. The Transnational Institute (TNI), a think-tank with its roots in the anti-Vietnam movement, denounced it for “formalising the corporate capture of the UN and moving towards an increasingly privatised and less democratic global governance.” 400 organisations subsequently signed a letter calling for the termination of the UN/WEF’s agreement.
Far from being inhibited from continuing to develop policy – or using its influence and the resources of its powerful, global corporate membership to persuade or compel national Governments to adopt it’s ideals – the WEF states “now is the time to press the reset button on capitalism”. In essence it is calling for the dismantling of the entire global economic system in order that it can be re-cast to a design complying with its own agenda."tallbloke.wordpress.com/2020/06/27/davos-the-birthplace-of-a-new-world-government-but-who-are-the-parents/One would almost think it was planned as COP21 didn't work. Interesting that BLM also wants to end capitalism one would almost think they are on the same 'side' as the billionaire globalists.
|
|
|
Post by nautonnier on Jun 28, 2020 9:25:58 GMT
[ Snip ] Kinda rich complaining about a "less democratic global governance" when talking about the UN supposedly getting weaker. How many kleptocrats and dictators have votes in that body? For that matter, how were the permanent members of the security council picked? A former national Greens leader, Bob Brown, was an advocate for world government, "one person, one vote" ... Should we all move to India or ... China? Maurice Strong moved to China However, China is an economics basket case at the moment as it has managed as the 'workshop of the world' to annoy all its customers who were largely paying in food and fuel.
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Jun 28, 2020 17:09:03 GMT
[ Snip ] Kinda rich complaining about a "less democratic global governance" when talking about the UN supposedly getting weaker. How many kleptocrats and dictators have votes in that body? For that matter, how were the permanent members of the security council picked? A former national Greens leader, Bob Brown, was an advocate for world government, "one person, one vote" ... Should we all move to India or ... China? That is the World equivalent of allowing California and New York to decide an American Presidential election.
|
|
|
Post by nautonnier on Nov 2, 2020 15:55:22 GMT
Now if that was also the day Trump was re-elected and put the kibosh on the Great Reset - that would be interesting
|
|
|
Post by nautonnier on Nov 24, 2020 18:49:51 GMT
|
|
|
Post by nautonnier on Dec 22, 2020 19:12:25 GMT
"Under Article II, Section 2 of the Constitution, the president “shall have power, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, to make treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur ...” The idea of allowing unaccountable U.N. bureaucrats to gain control over U.S. energy policy is not exactly a great idea, which helps to explain why Obama decided to bypass the Senate and join the U.N. climate treaty by way of an executive agreement. How did this happen, and what exactly went down while Biden was serving as vice president?
Government Accountability and Oversight, the public interest law firm that filed the FOIA suit on behalf of Energy Policy Advocates, has available on its website an 18-page document its client obtained detailing how Team Obama bypassed the constitutional process.
At issue is what’s known as a Circular 175 memo, which refers to the legal procedure that administrations follow when entering into treaties and other international agreements. If the document in question is the Circular 175 memo, then “it represents a major political and legal scandal with significant implications for U.S. participation in Paris, and the effort to bind the U.S. without following the Constitution,” Chris Horner, an attorney with GAO, says in a press release. The key arguments the Obama administration used to avoid activating the Senate’s “advice and consent” role amount to an insistence that the Paris Agreement was akin to other precedent executive agreements."More here: www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/foia-lawsuit-seeks-to-highlight-just-how-little-advice-and-consent-went-into-the-paris-agreement
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Jan 9, 2021 21:57:17 GMT
|
|
|
Post by sigurdur on Jan 9, 2021 22:52:47 GMT
|
|
|
Post by nautonnier on Jan 10, 2021 11:20:13 GMT
Only to be expected. But now there is a 'government' that thinks that they can spend their way out of it
|
|