|
Post by missouriboy on Dec 10, 2015 5:25:21 GMT
I particularly liked the last response about Helmut the Mawson temperature taker But ,,, if there's a particularly warm spot in Hell ... I know who's going. At least that is my vote.
|
|
|
Post by sigurdur on Jan 2, 2016 18:29:31 GMT
|
|
|
Post by acidohm on Jan 2, 2016 20:45:46 GMT
I already feel an affinity for iceland....now more so!!
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Jan 2, 2016 22:07:08 GMT
And a new statistic is born! The proportion of papers found in the ISI Web of Science database that explicitly endorsed anthropogenic climate change has fallen from 75% (for the period between 1993 and 2003) as of 2004 to 45% from 2004 to 2008, while outright disagreement has risen from 0% to 6% (Oreskes, 2004; Schulte, 2008).
|
|
|
Post by sigurdur on Jan 16, 2016 2:40:48 GMT
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Jan 16, 2016 4:25:04 GMT
Setting: The Bunker. Situation: Denier infantry are closing in for the kill. The loyal zealots are falling in the streets. The occupants are desperately preparing their last defenses. Eva is screaming about a golden parachute. And Blondi is making reservations at the local dogie hospice. Director: Mel Brooks Rating: Not for the sober.
|
|
|
Post by sigurdur on Apr 7, 2016 1:11:21 GMT
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Apr 7, 2016 2:18:15 GMT
The Inquisition Returns:Are you really trying to tell me the Earth ISN'T FLAT? How dare you? %&*%*&######### The Priest has a big stake and a match waiting for YOU. And I'll be there...with the kindlin!
|
|
|
Post by sigurdur on Mar 9, 2017 3:06:48 GMT
In the dog house big time. I made the mistake of posting a paper on Skeptical Sciences facebook thing.
Of course, it was a paper that they didn't like to see, even tho it is pretty old.
The Alley paper on Greenland's ice age. Ya know, that ice that is only 110,000 years old?
Well, her Facebook thing got locked. Now.......women are funny about their hubbies messing with their facebook. So........got it unlocked, but amazing now she (I) can't post on SS facebook. The ability to comment is gone, along with the comments I had made.
They sure don't like science on that site.
|
|
|
Post by sigurdur on Jul 14, 2017 23:23:39 GMT
Climate central has a facebook page.
I keep getting blocked from posting there, as I usually post a paper I have found and shared here.
Bad case of SS syndrome.
|
|
|
Post by sigurdur on Jul 15, 2017 4:04:04 GMT
Climate central has a facebook page. I keep getting blocked from posting there, as I usually post a paper I have found and shared here. Bad case of SS syndrome. Who is this? I can't tell who this is, it's as if it was nobody I knew. Have you tried making an anonymous facebook profile? No. First they told me my name was fake. So I replied that they must be prejudiced against Icelandic names. Then they wanted a picture so I sent them my profile picture. Then they said published papers were spam Then they booted me. Removed all my posts. I think what really upset them was someone knew about the 1956 calving, and they sure don't like published papers that don't support their rhetoric
|
|
|
Post by acidohm on Jul 15, 2017 6:06:39 GMT
Climate central has a facebook page. I keep getting blocked from posting there, as I usually post a paper I have found and shared here. Bad case of SS syndrome. I find it unbelievable how nasty, unfriendly and hostile warmist sites are. Surely if their viewpoint and scientific position are that secure, no amount of 'denier' participation in their conversations would affect the message they convey. Sites like wuwt however, endless to and fro of science and discussion. You may not agree with it all but i guarantee people learn more there.
|
|
|
Post by Ratty on Jul 15, 2017 7:16:02 GMT
Climate central has a facebook page. I keep getting blocked from posting there, as I usually post a paper I have found and shared here. Bad case of SS syndrome. I find it unbelievable how nasty, unfriendly and hostile warmist sites are. Surely if their viewpoint and scientific position are that secure, no amount of 'denier' participation in their conversations would affect the message they convey. Sites like wuwt however, endless to and fro of science and discussion. You may not agree with it all but i guarantee people learn more there. Couldn't agree more. Judith Curry's site has the same style of discussion comments.
|
|
|
Post by nautonnier on Jul 15, 2017 9:01:50 GMT
I find it unbelievable how nasty, unfriendly and hostile warmist sites are. Surely if their viewpoint and scientific position are that secure, no amount of 'denier' participation in their conversations would affect the message they convey. Sites like wuwt however, endless to and fro of science and discussion. You may not agree with it all but i guarantee people learn more there. Couldn't agree more. Judith Curry's site has the same style of discussion comments. The only problem I have found at those sites is that trolls attempt to be the first posting and the entire thread gets derailed feeding the troll rather than discussing the post.
|
|
|
Post by Ratty on Jul 15, 2017 11:12:39 GMT
Couldn't agree more. Judith Curry's site has the same style of discussion comments. The only problem I have found at those sites is that trolls attempt to be the first posting and the entire thread gets derailed feeding the troll rather than discussing the post. Fair point, but the trolls are usually recognised ... doesn't stop the misdirection though on some occasions.
|
|