|
Post by nautonnier on Sept 10, 2019 23:49:36 GMT
Quite
The entire point of these sensors is to 'sense' the storm clouds. At the levels of the cloud tops water in the updrafts will be frozen or in the process of freezing
It still does not assist the clarification of a molecule in a water droplet that has been carried up in a 100kt updraft and is now in the process of freezing and (wave hands about) it releases latent heat of fusion. There will not be a whole lot of molecular collisions from N2 or O2 with water molecules in the middle of the droplet so presumably they cannot freeze?
|
|
|
Post by nautonnier on Sept 11, 2019 11:46:43 GMT
On a different topic.... "It does appear that the timing of the vast majority CRBG eruptions can be fairly well tied down to a 700,000 to 900,000 year period coincident with the Mid-Miocene Climatic Optimum. However, even with the prodigious volume of CO2 associated with flood basalt eruptions, it’s not enough to significantly move the “climate needle”:
A statistic: It is estimated that an erupting basalt lava flow with a volume of 2000 km3 would release approximately 7 billion tonnes of carbon (or 26 billion tonnes of CO2).
This is about the same as the amount currently released by burning of fossil fuels – each year.
Saunders & Reichow "wattsupwiththat.com/2019/09/10/the-first-day-of-the-cenozoic/
|
|
|
Post by duwayne on Sept 11, 2019 14:53:07 GMT
Quite The entire point of these sensors is to 'sense' the storm clouds. At the levels of the cloud tops water in the updrafts will be frozen or in the process of freezing It still does not assist the clarification of a molecule in a water droplet that has been carried up in a 100kt updraft and is now in the process of freezing and (wave hands about) it releases latent heat of fusion. There will not be a whole lot of molecular collisions from N2 or O2 with water molecules in the middle of the droplet so presumably they cannot freeze? I've seen videos where someone throws water into the air on a very cold day and the water freezes before it hits the ground.
|
|
|
Post by acidohm on Sept 11, 2019 15:54:02 GMT
Quite The entire point of these sensors is to 'sense' the storm clouds. At the levels of the cloud tops water in the updrafts will be frozen or in the process of freezing It still does not assist the clarification of a molecule in a water droplet that has been carried up in a 100kt updraft and is now in the process of freezing and (wave hands about) it releases latent heat of fusion. There will not be a whole lot of molecular collisions from N2 or O2 with water molecules in the middle of the droplet so presumably they cannot freeze? I've seen videos where someone throws water into the air on a very cold day and the water freezes before it hits the ground. Boiling water at that....tho it's counter intuitive as the Mpemba effect experimentally demonstrates hot water freezes faster then colder water. If the agw attribute magical effects to co2, its got nothing on water.... 2 other idiosyncrasies, frozen water is less dense then liquid, and its the only substance to be present on earth in its 3 states naturally.
|
|
|
Post by nautonnier on Sept 11, 2019 15:57:28 GMT
Quite The entire point of these sensors is to 'sense' the storm clouds. At the levels of the cloud tops water in the updrafts will be frozen or in the process of freezing It still does not assist the clarification of a molecule in a water droplet that has been carried up in a 100kt updraft and is now in the process of freezing and (wave hands about) it releases latent heat of fusion. There will not be a whole lot of molecular collisions from N2 or O2 with water molecules in the middle of the droplet so presumably they cannot freeze? I've seen videos where someone throws water into the air on a very cold day and the water freezes before it hits the ground. I wonder if anyone has done that and filmed it with an infrared camera
|
|
|
Post by Ratty on Sept 11, 2019 21:43:01 GMT
I've seen videos where someone throws water into the air on a very cold day and the water freezes before it hits the ground. I wonder if anyone has done that and filmed it with an infrared camera Stirrer.
|
|
|
Post by nautonnier on Sept 12, 2019 3:37:05 GMT
I wonder if anyone has done that and filmed it with an infrared camera Stirrer. >Innocent look< (poorly executed due lack of practice)
|
|
|
Post by nautonnier on Sept 18, 2019 11:43:23 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Ratty on Oct 13, 2019 13:08:30 GMT
HELP: I'm looking for a graph featuring CO2 (increasing ppm) and CET temperatures from 1850 or thereabouts.
It's to settle a discussion in another place. Anyone know of something like that or could manufacture one?
|
|
|
Post by nautonnier on Oct 13, 2019 16:22:27 GMT
HELP: I'm looking for a graph featuring CO2 (increasing ppm) and CET temperatures from 1850 or thereabouts. It's to settle a discussion in another place. Anyone know of something like that or could manufacture one? There are several 'massaged' diagrams too so you need to be cautious of thumbs on scales.
|
|
|
Post by Ratty on Oct 14, 2019 0:19:11 GMT
HELP: I'm looking for a graph featuring CO2 (increasing ppm) and CET temperatures from 1850 or thereabouts. It's to settle a discussion in another place. Anyone know of something like that or could manufacture one? There are several 'massaged' diagrams too so you need to be cautious of thumbs on scales. The school ma'am I'm having the discussion with reckons that a graph using the same data, but plotted from 1850, would show a distinct correlation. PS: The graph you posted is the one I used in the 'discussion'. I've since posted this to shift the goal posts and, to keep her busy, I posted a link to the Law Dome data, suggesting she could plot it ..... I'm evil, I know:
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Oct 14, 2019 0:27:33 GMT
Did you suggest eye glasses?
|
|
|
Post by nautonnier on Oct 14, 2019 10:04:07 GMT
|
|
|
Post by nautonnier on Oct 14, 2019 10:06:06 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Ratty on Oct 14, 2019 11:53:38 GMT
Did you suggest eye glasses? Nail on head, MB. She's just had cataract operations.
|
|