|
Post by racookpe1978 on Mar 4, 2009 3:13:00 GMT
We (the readers and writers at www.freerepublic.com ) have been discussing between 4 and 8 AGW stories (extracted from the MSM) every day for the past three years. New ones keep coming: today, one about the freezing over of Lake Superior. Yes, the MSM continues to propagandize the issue - They DO continue to hide stories that disprove AGW and to hype stories that further their "religion." We can only continue to bring up each countering fact one by one.
|
|
|
Post by daffyduck on Mar 5, 2009 21:01:44 GMT
Freeper here Bulwinkle, a.k.a. Alec, a.k.a. Daffy Duck
|
|
|
Post by Maui on Mar 7, 2009 16:34:29 GMT
NASA must have some vested interest in maintaining prediction methods which are not working. Maybe it's just job security--for example, their Solar Radiation and Climate Experiment is based on the assumption that the Sun directly controls climate. Or maybe there is some national security issue, such as satellite insurance premiums covering damage from solar storms.
|
|
|
Post by daffyduck on Mar 10, 2009 19:22:37 GMT
NASA must have some vested interest in maintaining prediction methods which are not working. Maybe it's just job security--for example, their Solar Radiation and Climate Experiment is based on the assumption that the Sun directly controls climate. Or maybe there is some national security issue, such as satellite insurance premiums covering damage from solar storms. "NASA must have some vested interest in maintaining prediction methods which are not working." a. Hathaway? b. Hansen? c. All nasa employees that start with "H"?
|
|
dc51
Level 2 Rank
Posts: 97
|
Post by dc51 on Mar 10, 2009 21:03:25 GMT
I read somewhere lately, Could have been on WUWT? rare arctic birds seen much further south this year. I heard this on the radio, there was a very unusual sighting of an arctic gull on the south cost of Ireland last week.
|
|
|
Post by Ratty on Mar 11, 2009 2:35:29 GMT
|
|
|
Post by woodstove on Mar 11, 2009 19:03:19 GMT
|
|
dc51
Level 2 Rank
Posts: 97
|
Post by dc51 on Mar 11, 2009 20:48:49 GMT
|
|
|
Post by msphar on Mar 13, 2009 8:21:04 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Maui on Mar 17, 2009 16:39:11 GMT
Great thread. This is a once a 100 year event we are witnessing on the sun If I have kept the count correctly so far only two "low sun activity" news items have been found. Once every 200 years is more accurate!
|
|
|
Post by woodstove on Mar 17, 2009 20:21:37 GMT
Great thread. This is a once a 100 year event we are witnessing on the sun If I have kept the count correctly so far only two "low sun activity" news items have been found. Once every 200 years is more accurate! Three: www.thehopeforamerica.com/play.php?id=513
|
|
|
Post by twawki on Mar 23, 2009 6:27:33 GMT
|
|
|
Post by madman2001 on Mar 25, 2009 13:35:35 GMT
On their full-page Weather Page on Sunday, the Chicago Tribune had a section entitled "Global warming? Some expect global cooling".
It went on to say:
"As an alternative theory to global warming, some researchers have noted a correlation between cold periods on the Earth and periods of greatly diminished numbers of sunspots. In 1989, German author Dr. Theodor Landscheidt (1927-2004) forecast a period of minimum sunspot numbers after 1990, to be accompanied by global cooling that would peak in 2030. Plunging sunspot numbers, especially in recent months, and hard Northern Hemisphere winters in 2007-08 and 2008-09 have sparked interest in his (and similar) theories - but only time will tell."
It was accompanied by a graph showing sunspots vs global temperatures ("It's just a snapshot in time, but the past 1,100 years show some correlation between sunspot minimums and cooler global temperatures"), a graph showing the "Monthly sunspot totals since January 2000", and a color photo of the blank sun.
Craig
|
|
|
Post by kiwistonewall on Mar 26, 2009 2:47:39 GMT
Nothing, zip, zilch at sciencedaily about the absence of sunspots, not any discussion about the solar cycle at all. It appears to be a deliberately censored topic.
Weird, and very disturbing.
|
|
|
Post by savethesharks on Mar 29, 2009 2:11:16 GMT
Agreed about Science Daily. Begs the question, though: WHY would they censor such a topic? Is this just ignorance and oversight? Or is there some agenda there.
I see they have a whole pull-down on "Climate Change" yet the "Sun" is one sub-topic of of the "Space" pull-down.
Bingo.
Chris Norfolk, VA, USA
|
|