|
|
Post by sigurdur on Dec 28, 2009 22:33:21 GMT
Deep Climate is trying to defend the hockey stick tree ring data again. I can't believe that they just keep trying to defend junk science. Don't these guys have a clue?
|
|
|
|
Post by icefisher on Dec 28, 2009 23:58:52 GMT
They totally disregard the biased and 'corrected' proxy metrics for CO 2 on which their hypothesis is based. I remember when I got my first motorcycle and somebody told me that you will be relatively safe as long as you respect it for what it is. I guess the same thing works for being well educated and getting conned. As soon as you figure you are too smart to get conned thats when it happens.  |
|
|
|
Post by trbixler on Jan 20, 2010 15:08:26 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by stranger on Jan 20, 2010 19:54:35 GMT
Icefisher, a grifter I once knew picked the best "educated" marks. He said they paid the least attention to common knowledge and the most to a good line of patter. His specialty was selling oil leases - on Federal land.
Stranger
|
|
|
|
Post by sigurdur on Apr 17, 2010 22:11:45 GMT
MWP......again.
|
|
|
|
Post by magellan on Apr 22, 2010 16:27:44 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by sigurdur on Apr 22, 2010 19:03:17 GMT
There is not a tree growing that is a good proxy for past temperatures. When will these people finally understand that?
|
|
|
|
Post by scpg02 on Apr 22, 2010 22:38:27 GMT
There is not a tree growing that is a good proxy for past temperatures. When will these people finally understand that? Especially after the two recent studies. One showing trees can regulate their own temp and second they respond more to cosmic radiation than temp. |
|
