Do you trash the Environment

[sentient]

Some of us not only do not trash the environment, but practice at the leading edge of cleaning up some of the more toxic cocktails industry develops the recipes for. If you want to see my two most recent design/build/operate systems in 3-dimensional video, send me a PM with an e-mail address and I will mail you back the link. Its the only way to download them I know of from my Cox digital vault sharing site. The three videos are about 320 megabytes, so you will need a fast connection and a fair dollop of time.

I will also send along some explanatory text for these are fairly exotic systems.

[cnlmustard]

AJ1983 seems to have touched on my "collective issues theory" I posted a while back. When you see that AGW is REALLY just a political issue it becomes apparent that it trends along with other certain opinions.

Slightly modifying his statement to describe myself, a skeptic:
I also don't believe in ozone reduction caused by man, in the destruction of rainforests beyond what is being replanted, in the extinction of worthwhile species or that man has an overall negative influence on the environment.

I distrust government (including leaders), liberals, junk science, violent muslims and precisely everything that is proven (not just believed) to be hamful.

Because HE has pigeonholed me so well, is he now considered prejudiced? Oh My!

[icefisher]

Nov 25, 2009 13:49:14 GMT aj1983 said:

(together with the commonly found ammo and shooting holes)

LOL! Nature looks a lot neater with billboards without bullet holes!

Thats a good one!

[byz]

I never trash the environment.

I recycle everything I can, I've used low energy light bulbs for over 18 years.

I got my house thermally insulated as soon as I moved in, plus I walk or use public transport whenever I can rather than drive my car (it's only done 22,000 miles in 9 years most of those done in the first 3 years).

Also I buy the highest rated energy saving devices (even if they cost more), plus I allow trees to grow in my small garden and coppice them for their wood periodically to use as fuel (I even make paper and cardboard into logs to burn).

I have been using food waste as compost for years and have been growing my own food for years.

As a family we hand down clothes and I will repair what I can, finally recycling when worn out!

I have done this for years because I don't waste and I don't want to poison what I live in.

For a brief period I was taken in by CO2, but realised it didn't stand up when you looked at the physics (to many assumptions - just a hypothesis).

However I am still very green in my life style and my family are some of the greenest people I know (except for my support for nuclear power due to the lies pushed by the green lobby).

So I do not believe in AGW as pushed by the media (obviously humans cause some warming just by using energy).

I think that AGW will be a disaster for the "Green" movement when it is discredited and I wish the fanatics would just go away (but that will never happen).

[itsthesunstupid]

Dec 3, 2009 7:31:38 GMT byz said:

I never trash the environment.

I recycle everything I can, I've used low energy light bulbs for over 18 years.

I got my house thermally insulated as soon as I moved in, plus I walk or use public transport whenever I can rather than drive my car (it's only done 22,000 miles in 9 years most of those done in the first 3 years).

Also I buy the highest rated energy saving devices (even if they cost more), plus I allow trees to grow in my small garden and coppice them for their wood periodically to use as fuel (I even make paper and cardboard into logs to burn).

I have been using food waste as compost for years and have been growing my own food for years.

As a family we hand down clothes and I will repair what I can, finally recycling when worn out!

I have done this for years because I don't waste and I don't want to poison what I live in.

For a brief period I was taken in by CO2, but realised it didn't stand up when you looked at the physics (to many assumptions - just a hypothesis).

However I am still very green in my life style and my family are some of the greenest people I know (except for my support for nuclear power due to the lies pushed by the green lobby).

So I do not believe in AGW as pushed by the media (obviously humans cause some warming just by using energy).

I think that AGW will be a disaster for the "Green" movement when it is discredited and I wish the fanatics would just go away (but that will never happen).

I am concerned that there could be a green backlash when AGW is thoroughly exposed. Now, it would be great if we could avoid the DDT or Alar-like scams, but there are many credible things we should all be doing to protect the environment. Hopefully, we can redirect resources to recycling, cleaning toxins from the air and water, better waste managment, etc.

[hairball]

THIEVING GREENS: Study shows Green-product enthusiasts more likely to cheat and steal

"participants were again assigned to shop in either a green or conventional store. Then they performed a computer task that involved earning small sums of cash. The setup offered the opportunity to cheat and steal with impunity. The eco-shoppers were more likely to do both.

The Stanford professor pondering the study opined:

Why might this happen? According to [Benoit Monin, a professor at Stanford], there are two theories. One is that when we’ve established our rectitude, we interpret ensuing behavior in a different light: I just proved I’m a good person, so what I’m doing now must be okay …"

There's an AGW (Antisocial, Grubby Warmists) theory I can believe in.

[sigurdur]

Dec 9, 2009 20:53:16 GMT hairball said:

THIEVING GREENS: Study shows Green-product enthusiasts more likely to cheat and steal

"participants were again assigned to shop in either a green or conventional store. Then they performed a computer task that involved earning small sums of cash. The setup offered the opportunity to cheat and steal with impunity. The eco-shoppers were more likely to do both.

The Stanford professor pondering the study opined:

Why might this happen? According to [Benoit Monin, a professor at Stanford], there are two theories. One is that when we’ve established our rectitude, we interpret ensuing behavior in a different light: I just proved I’m a good person, so what I’m doing now must be okay …"

There's an AGW (Antisocial, Grubby Warmists) theory I can believe in.

Now if that study doesn't fit Mr. Gore's lifestyle to a "T", I don't know what would.