|
|
Post by curiousgeorge on Aug 2, 2010 17:11:03 GMT
I wish I knew what goes on in Lisa "Dusty" Jackson's head when they come up with this kind of idiocy. Not much, I think. They plan to now reduce the allowable dust in the atmosphere by half. Specifically by putting a halt to farming apparently, because there is no way you can farm without making dust. www.news9.com/Global/story.asp?S=12899662 . Be sure to read the letter a number of Senators sent her. |
|
|
|
Post by Pooh on Aug 3, 2010 5:56:58 GMT
I wish I knew what goes on in Lisa "Dusty" Jackson's head ....They plan to now reduce the allowable dust in the atmosphere by half. You do know: Control (over food supply). The power to allocate to rent-seekers and favored groups. The solution is straightforward: put the EPA on a strict diet (of funds), say 50%. ;D |
|
|
|
Post by scpg02 on Aug 3, 2010 7:46:11 GMT
I wish I knew what goes on in Lisa "Dusty" Jackson's head ....They plan to now reduce the allowable dust in the atmosphere by half. You do know: Control (over food supply). The power to allocate to rent-seekers and favored groups. The solution is straightforward: put the EPA on a strict diet (of funds), say 50%. ;D How about we just do away with the EPA altogether? |
|
|
|
Post by boxman on Aug 4, 2010 2:33:16 GMT
Crazy..
I also thought dust was a good thing in these "global warming" days??
|
|
|
|
Post by Pooh on Aug 4, 2010 4:02:31 GMT
How about we just do away with the EPA altogether? The problem is that the original Clean Air Act actually did some good. The 1948 Donora, Pa smog killed people. The current problem comes from broadly-written Congressional legalese that can be contorted by the power-hungry to cover everything from "Frisbees to flatulence" (SCOTUS). For the EPA, I would propose a very short leash attached to a choke collar. |
|
|
|
Post by Pooh on Aug 4, 2010 4:18:16 GMT
Crazy.. I also thought dust was a good thing in these "global warming" days?? So is SO 2, according to the IPCC. Climate models do not agree on how sensitive the climate is to increases in CO2 and manage to replicate twentieth century temperature trends only by inferring (though parametrization) whatever aerosol cooling effect is necessary to “explain” observed temperatures. Johnston, Jason Scott, and Robert G. Fuller, Jr. Global Warming Advocacy Science: a Cross Examination. Research Paper. University Of Pennsylvania: University Of Pennsylvania Law School, May 2010. www.probeinternational.org/UPennCross.pdfHowever: EPA. “SO 2 Reductions and Allowance Trading under the Acid Rain Program.” Governmental. Clean Air Markets, April 14, 2009. www.epa.gov/airmarkets/progsregs/arp/s02.htmlPerhaps the EPS figures that (once natural cooling takes hold), they can reduce SO 2 enough to keep the warming going on.  |
|
|
|
Post by scpg02 on Aug 4, 2010 5:26:00 GMT
How about we just do away with the EPA altogether? The problem is that the original Clean Air Act actually did some good. I think there are other ways of dealing with these kinds of problems. It is always the law of unintended consequences that is the problem. |
|
|
|
Post by curiousgeorge on Aug 4, 2010 11:27:36 GMT
The problem is that the original Clean Air Act actually did some good. I think there are other ways of dealing with these kinds of problems. It is always the law of unintended consequences that is the problem. A suspicious person might be inclined to think that the consequences of actions like these are indeed what is really intended. |
|
|
|
Post by scpg02 on Aug 4, 2010 14:55:23 GMT
I think there are other ways of dealing with these kinds of problems. It is always the law of unintended consequences that is the problem. A suspicious person might be inclined to think that the consequences of actions like these are indeed what is really intended. Oh I have no doubt it was all part of the plan but people here think I'm enough of a conspiracy nut without adding fuel to the fire. ;D |
|
|
|
Post by curiousgeorge on Aug 5, 2010 15:38:47 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by scpg02 on Aug 5, 2010 16:13:44 GMT
Welcome to California! They have already banned lead in condor areas and have legislation moving through to ban it everywhere. They weren't successful banning guns so they are going after the ammo. BTW, they also have legislation moving through that you can only buy 50 rounds a month and you can't buy out of state or over the internet. |
|
|
|
Post by Pooh on Aug 6, 2010 3:13:47 GMT
No one wants to be one of those "conspiracy theorists", I'm sure. Still, I wonder what all these goings-on might look like if it really was a conspiracy.  |
|
|
|
Post by scpg02 on Aug 6, 2010 4:05:20 GMT
No one wants to be one of those "conspiracy theorists", I'm sure. Still, I wonder what all these goings-on might look like if it really was a conspiracy. Once you take the red pill there is no going back to the matrix. I can show you the door but you have to walk through it. |
|
|
|
Post by curiousgeorge on Aug 6, 2010 11:05:52 GMT
No one wants to be one of those "conspiracy theorists", I'm sure. Still, I wonder what all these goings-on might look like if it really was a conspiracy. A conspiracy requires a plan. For example; SMEAC . Situation, Mission, Execution, Administration and logistics, Command and signals. If there is a conspiracy it is a very poorly thought out one. |
|
|
|
Post by Pooh on Aug 6, 2010 15:38:46 GMT
I wonder what all these goings-on might look like if it really was a conspiracy. A conspiracy requires a plan. For example; SMEAC . Situation, Mission, Execution, Administration and logistics, Command and signals. If there is a conspiracy it is a very poorly thought out one. Gotcha covered there: IPCC AR4 SPM, Kyoto Agreement, RulesOfTheGame.pdf (ClimateGate files), Post-Normal Science, EPA vs. Massachusetts, etc., etc., etc. ;D |
|
