|
Post by missouriboy on Nov 3, 2017 20:42:58 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Ratty on Nov 3, 2017 21:47:11 GMT
Thanks MB ..... for everything you contribute.
|
|
|
Post by blustnmtn on Nov 3, 2017 22:57:37 GMT
MAGA MoBoy!
|
|
|
Post by mondeoman on Nov 4, 2017 0:34:47 GMT
To put that into perspective, that’s 0.5c drop over some 77m km2. Equates to 64.5 BILLION Tw.
By comparison, annual global primary energy consumption is a paltry 170,000 Tw.
Now, if global temps have flatlined, as shown by satellite temp record, then that’s a cack load of energy that has left the system....
Can’t see us having to worry about rising temps any time soon.
|
|
|
Post by sigurdur on Nov 4, 2017 3:05:49 GMT
If the Arctic area is warmer than average, that heat is GONE!
|
|
|
Post by douglavers on Nov 4, 2017 5:27:19 GMT
|
|
|
Post by acidohm on Nov 4, 2017 7:22:29 GMT
Have a look at HadCRUT 4.5, shows no such thing....
|
|
|
Post by Ratty on Nov 4, 2017 7:42:07 GMT
I'm just confused .....
|
|
|
Post by nonentropic on Nov 4, 2017 8:02:37 GMT
noise, just let the moving average give it some stability.
the change of season usually give the greatest fluctuations also.
Astro may wish to update also. it would add texture and discussion.
|
|
|
Post by mondeoman on Nov 4, 2017 8:28:49 GMT
|
|
|
Post by blustnmtn on Nov 4, 2017 11:59:21 GMT
I was really surprised to see the satellite data also. I wonder if the heat sucked up by the hurricanes could have spiked the atmospheric data compared to the surface. Roy Spencer is puzzled by this too so we are in good company.
|
|
jopo
New Member
Posts: 30
|
Post by jopo on Nov 4, 2017 13:10:44 GMT
My observations have been that TLT Satellite data lags surface data when in the monthly format by about 2 months
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Nov 5, 2017 2:07:39 GMT
My observations have been that TLT Satellite data lags surface data when in the monthly format by about 2 months Any opinions as to why?
|
|
|
Post by nautonnier on Nov 5, 2017 9:08:39 GMT
My observations have been that TLT Satellite data lags surface data when in the monthly format by about 2 months Any opinions as to why? Perhaps that gives a clue to the overall conductivity of the atmosphere. Not talking about local convection but the general heating effect of a warm surface on an atmosphere that is mainly made up of non-radiative gases. I would suspect that as the heat engine gets going the delay would become less as convection increases.
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Dec 20, 2017 22:13:55 GMT
|
|