Agreed, in part, but no, it does not change my view on solar cycle polarity changes and barycenter crossings. I've worked with this in tandem with planetary modulations in my forecasting work and have accurately predicted climate events with this method in conjunction with my astrometeorological methods. My own work includes magnetic flux changes by the Sun along with the positions of the planets to fixed stars relative to the Earth and its climate changes.
Different people have their own 'methods,' and I have my own. Some of those who have worked on these matters in the past, like Theodore Landscheidt (the late astrometeorologist) are like those astromets of centuries past who we stand on the shoulders of as we head into the future and refine the work. I do my part as an astromet in the 21st century and my forecasting stands on its own legs from the amount of time and effort I put into the work. It is difficult and complex work and time consuming to say the least.
Anyhow, the resultant climate/weather events always confirms which forecasts are right and which are wrong.
That's how it works and I have no problem with that as Mother Nature always has the last word.
In the final analysis, one has to forecast; for that is what Science comes down at the end of it all. I've been quite preoccupied with family health matters of late so am gradually getting back to work this summer into autumn.
My own forecasting work via Astrometeorology has led to my climate event forecasts of the 2009-2010 El Nino, the 2010-2011 La Nina that followed, the Midwest Drought and the California multiyear drought. That's testable as it is Mother Nature that confirms all prior forecasts.
I also have forecast the official start of global cooling in late 2017, to last approximately 36 years. I've stated this publicly for years now.
We will see the first major La Nina, under that new climate regime of global cooling, according to my calculations, in the winter of 2021-2022. This will be preceded by an El Nino (2019-2020)
My focus is on forecasting and preparation, not merely postulating an hypothesis. That is the difference between forecaster and researcher and since many of those who stick strictly to hypothesizing must realize that in the final analysis the entire point of Science is the ability to predict. That's it.
My global cooling forecast (2017-2053) was made years ago. I continue to warn about the Sun's coming grand minimum and the particular modulation of planetary signatures close to fixed stars associated with powerful climate conditions. The peak of global cooling will arrive in the mid-2030s. When it begins in late 2017, we will see some rather abrupt weather events in various regions worldwide.
My findings on the peak of the Sun's decline and global cooling was recently confirmed by scientists at Northumbria University in England who have 'discovered' the magnetic findings on the Sun that I have used to forecast future climate changes, like my global cooling forecast.
According to their findings they say that the Sun's activity will decline by as much as 60 percent during the decade of the 2030s.
The lead researcher Valentina Zharkova, a Northumbria University mathematics professor, says this could lead to conditions that were last observed during the mini ice age that began in 1645.
Zharkova said,
"We found magnetic wave components (on the Sun) appearing in pairs, originating in two different layers in the Sun’s interior. They both have a frequency of approximately 11 years, although this frequency is slightly different, and they are offset in time.
"Over the cycle, the waves fluctuate between the northern and southern hemispheres of the Sun. Combining both waves together and comparing to real data for the current solar cycle, we found that our predictions showed an accuracy of 97%,” she added.
For more, see ->>
www.ras.org.uk/news-and-press/2680-irregular-heartbeat-of-the-sun-driven-by-double-dynamo