|
Post by nautonnier on Jun 29, 2020 11:16:44 GMT
|
|
|
Post by nautonnier on Jun 29, 2020 21:16:09 GMT
Salivation allowed
|
|
|
Post by walnut on Jun 29, 2020 21:23:11 GMT
But you know you only get several hundred rounds before measurable barrel erosion, gas pressure is very high. That's the drawback
|
|
|
Post by nautonnier on Jun 29, 2020 21:43:45 GMT
But you know you only get several hundred rounds before measurable barrel erosion, gas pressure is very high. That's the drawback I wouldn't know - the last time I shot at that distance was with a Lee Enfield .303. The idea was you started at 1000 yards fire 2 shots then ran 200 yards and fired again then ran another 200 yards and fired again and so on until you were 200 yards from the running man targets. Nice rifles.
|
|
|
Post by walnut on Jun 29, 2020 22:03:13 GMT
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Jun 29, 2020 22:27:38 GMT
Some barrels are better than others.
|
|
|
Post by nautonnier on Jun 30, 2020 0:26:07 GMT
Some barrels are better than others. Looks like it comes complete with vice too
|
|
|
Post by walnut on Jun 30, 2020 0:28:25 GMT
Lucky for us, that barrel is not eroded.
|
|
|
Post by Ratty on Jun 30, 2020 0:49:05 GMT
" Accurate to 1000 meters" but not much use in a crowd. Suggestion:
|
|
|
Post by Ratty on Jun 30, 2020 1:15:36 GMT
But you know you only get several hundred rounds before measurable barrel erosion, gas pressure is very high. That's the drawback I wouldn't know - the last time I shot at that distance was with a Lee Enfield .303. The idea was you started at 1000 yards fire 2 shots then ran 200 yards and fired again then ran another 200 yards and fired again and so on until you were 200 yards from the running man targets. Nice rifles. Ah, memories. My 200 yard running was with an SLR.
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Jun 30, 2020 1:57:08 GMT
" Accurate to 1000 meters" but not much use in a crowd. Suggestion: Roman crowd control.
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Jun 30, 2020 1:59:45 GMT
to be honest I don't think they should be sold You are right. Better a short sword. It's soo much more personal.
|
|
|
Post by nautonnier on Jun 30, 2020 10:02:32 GMT
I wouldn't know - the last time I shot at that distance was with a Lee Enfield .303. The idea was you started at 1000 yards fire 2 shots then ran 200 yards and fired again then ran another 200 yards and fired again and so on until you were 200 yards from the running man targets. Nice rifles. Ah, memories. My 200 yard running was with an SLR. I must admit I found the SLR a little of a disappointment from accurate shooting point of view it seemed not to have a straightforward recoil but felt like it was wriggling But it had a punch: if miscreant was taking cover behind a tree or a piece of street furniture then you shot them _through_ the tree/street furniture. During the last set of 'the troubles', I had a Master Pilot working with me in Scotland who actually lived in Northern Ireland. So he would leave his car parked at the ferry port in Northern Ireland and take the Port Patric ferry across to Scotland as a pedestrian pick up the car he used in Scotland and drive to Prestwick where we were working. His car (for those interested a Ford Capri 3.0L) was broken into by some miscreants (left or right footers) who then proceeded to drive through an army check point without stopping. One of the guards fired 3 rounds from his SLR into the back of the car one of which passed through the back of the car through the car, through the front bulkhead and split the engine block - effectively writing off the car. Yes the other two rounds had the appropriate effect too - no miscreants taking off running from that type of stop as car through check point equalled bomb in those troubled times. (Note for US police- only 3 shots were fired.)
|
|
|
Post by nautonnier on Jun 30, 2020 10:07:42 GMT
" Accurate to 1000 meters" but not much use in a crowd. Suggestion: Roman crowd control.
|
|
|
Post by acidohm on Jun 30, 2020 11:30:30 GMT
Ah, memories. My 200 yard running was with an SLR. I must admit I found the SLR a little of a disappointment from accurate shooting point of view it seemed not to have a straightforward recoil but felt like it was wriggling But it had a punch: if miscreant was taking cover behind a tree or a piece of street furniture then you shot them _through_ the tree/street furniture. During the last set of 'the troubles', I had a Master Pilot working with me in Scotland who actually lived in Northern Ireland. So he would leave his car parked at the ferry port in Northern Ireland and take the Port Patric ferry across to Scotland as a pedestrian pick up the car he used in Scotland and drive to Prestwick where we were working. His car (for those interested a Ford Capri 3.0L) was broken into by some miscreants (left or right footers) who then proceeded to drive through an army check point without stopping. One of the guards fired 3 rounds from his SLR into the back of the car one of which passed through the back of the car through the car, through the front bulkhead and split the engine block - effectively writing off the car. Yes the other two rounds had the appropriate effect too - no miscreants taking off running from that type of stop as car through check point equalled bomb in those troubled times. (Note for US police- only 3 shots were fired.) I fired an slr and SA80 on firing range with CCF. SA80 was piece if pss, SLR being longer and heavy was hard to aim unsupported, we use beret as shoulder pad as the recoil left you bruised.
|
|