|
|
Post by nautonnier on Jan 28, 2020 4:05:55 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by nautonnier on Jan 28, 2020 11:24:42 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by nautonnier on Feb 3, 2020 0:22:15 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by duwayne on Feb 3, 2020 15:37:33 GMT
Nautonnier, this article says "A new LED light bulb, on the other hand, uses a very small amount of electricity to cause a diode to emit a very narrow range of frequencies within the spectrum of visible light. The LED radiates only visible light — it does not radiate heat." Meanwhile, photons, whether their wavelengths are within the visible range (light) or not are small particles of energy. LEDs do radiate heat. That is only 1 of several untrue and/or misleading statements in the article which culminates in the untrue conclusion that "Greenhouse-warming theory 'just ain't so'". These untrue articles then are siezed upon by the warmists to make the broad claim that all skeptics are wrong. There are lot's of good and accurate articles and science which show why the warmists are overestimating the effects of CO2. This isn't one of them. DuWayne. Do you have some links to a few of the best of these? I'm collecting. Perhaps you posted them before and I missed them. Missouri,I just noticed this today. Curry, Spencer, Pielke Jr, Christy, Monckton and Eschenbach, are among those who regularly publish articles showing the overreach of the warmists. There are others like Lindzen who publish less often. |
|
|
|
Post by nautonnier on Feb 6, 2020 17:26:28 GMT
That's the GI from GIGO
|
|
|
|
Post by nautonnier on Feb 7, 2020 1:53:27 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by nautonnier on Feb 12, 2020 5:20:16 GMT
More from the same source...
|
|
|
|
Post by nautonnier on Feb 13, 2020 22:00:40 GMT
KR is on a mission to drag the 'denier' papers out into the light
|
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Feb 19, 2020 15:55:56 GMT
We here in Middle Earth have given up and joined the ranks of the Snowflake Fairies. Things are obviously out of control. This chart contains normalized seasonal temperature deviations (deg. C) - running, centered five-year seasonal mean minus 130-year seasonal mean divided by 130-year seasonal standard deviation. The deviants have it.   |
|
|
|
Post by duwayne on Feb 19, 2020 17:47:33 GMT
Missouri, I'm looking for a source of historical temperatures for various cities. Where did you find the data for Columbia, MO?
|
|
|
|
Post by missouriboy on Feb 19, 2020 19:03:03 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by duwayne on Feb 20, 2020 18:52:23 GMT
Thanks for the link and the offer to supply the spreadsheet. I'm going to check out the link first. |
|
|
|
Post by nautonnier on Mar 3, 2020 11:06:46 GMT
And some more - this should stir people up... it won't
|
|
|
|
Post by nautonnier on Mar 5, 2020 20:45:48 GMT
Yet more
|
|
|
|
Post by nautonnier on Mar 17, 2020 11:50:29 GMT
"Uncertainty In Natural Climate Forcing Is 870 Times Larger Than CO2 Forcing – A CO2 Signal Is Thus Not Detectable
louds regulate Earth’s climate. New studies suggest uncertainty in clouds’ surface radiative effects reach 17.4 W/m² per year (±8.7 W/m²/year). Total CO2 climate forcing is said to be just 0.02 W/m² per year. The difference in these magnitudes preclude detection of a CO2 signal in climate forcing.
According to Feldman et al. (2015), a 2 ppm increase in CO2 per year (22 ppm over the 11 years from 2000-2010) results in a surface radiative forcing influence of 0.02 W/m², or 0.2 W/m² per decade. This is said to be just “ten per cent of the trend in downwelling longwave radiation” when clouds and water vapor are considered.
In contrast, the influence of clouds in total longwave forcing is substantially larger, with radiative forcing trends reaching ±4 W/m² per decade."notrickszone.com/2020/03/16/uncertainty-in-natural-climate-forcing-is-870-times-larger-than-co2-forcing-a-co2-signal-is-thus-not-detectable/
|
|
