|
Post by curiousgeorge on Jul 1, 2009 15:39:54 GMT
|
|
|
Post by jimcripwell on Jul 3, 2009 13:14:53 GMT
May I draw your attention to an Australian document. sciencespeak.com/NoEvidence.pdfThis is the best short summary of why there is no evidence for AGW. I would be interested in comments frfom socold, steve and glc.
|
|
|
Post by socold on Jul 12, 2009 10:56:19 GMT
It is essentially a document that could be titled "no evidence for strong positive feedback in climate". It manages this though by ignoring all evidence that strong positive feedback exists.
|
|
|
Post by tobyglyn on Jul 14, 2009 7:08:53 GMT
It is essentially a document that could be titled "no evidence for strong positive feedback in climate". It manages this though by ignoring all evidence that strong positive feedback exists. Such as?
|
|
|
Post by socold on Jul 14, 2009 18:16:49 GMT
|
|
|
Post by sigurdur on Jul 15, 2009 0:25:29 GMT
The problem with this paper is that it talks about warming etc. However, warming has left and cooling has entered. I do hope the warming starts up again by 2030 as this cooling stuff sucks!
|
|
|
Post by jurinko on Jul 20, 2009 14:44:40 GMT
|
|
|
Post by magellan on Jul 23, 2009 17:36:47 GMT
scienceandpublicpolicy.org/images/stories/papers/originals/ocean_temps.pdfOCEAN TEMPERATURES: THE NEW BLUFF IN CLIMATE ALARMISM
The ocean data that the alarmists are relying on to establish their warming trends is all pre-Argo; it all comes from the old, less accurate XBTs. Now that we are measuring ocean temperatures properly, the warming trend has disappeared. Yep....
|
|
|
Post by sigurdur on Jul 27, 2009 0:38:13 GMT
|
|
|
Post by sigurdur on Jul 27, 2009 2:41:48 GMT
|
|
|
Post by jurinko on Jul 30, 2009 18:41:21 GMT
climaterealists.com/?id=3790Scientists seek to remove climate fear promoting editor and 'trade him to New York Times or Washington Post' An outpouring of skeptical scientists who are members of the American Chemical Society (ACS) are revolting against the group's editor-in-chief -- with some demanding he be removed -- after an editorial appeared claiming “the science of anthropogenic climate change is becoming increasingly well established.” ... One outraged ACS member wrote to Baum: "When all is said and done, and you and your kind are proven wrong (again), you will have moved on to be an unthinking urn for another rat pleading catastrophe. You will be removed. I promise." being chemist myself.. ;D
|
|
|
Post by poitsplace on Jul 30, 2009 23:34:31 GMT
|
|
|
Post by pacman on Aug 6, 2009 2:18:52 GMT
Hard to find a home for this one but there is a lively debate in the NZ Herald prompted by a silly comment from a minor film actress (and a Greenpeace Activist). PM John Key replies:
Castle-Hughes hits back at PM's taunt - National - NZ Herald News
|
|
|
Post by glc on Aug 29, 2009 9:59:51 GMT
|
|
van
Level 2 Rank
Posts: 59
|
Post by van on Aug 29, 2009 12:13:58 GMT
So GLC Are you now a skeptic?
|
|